More likely the other way around...common sense evades you
More likely the other way around...common sense evades you
Hey there silly goose. You produced an article about a river unearthing graves in 1996 - graves that were known to exist. That had nothing whatever to do with whether any graves had been unearthed in connection with the recent claims of unmarked graves which have caused all the controversy. You were asked to produce proof. It was obvious that you furiously googled for a few minutes, and came up with nothing. Game. Set. Match.So where is your proof that this is a hoax? I showed you proof of bodies being unearthed. Your arguments hold water like a sieve. All you have to say is liberal government hoax and you people believe anything. Have you ever heard of the scientific method? Thats what I base facts on, not some fake journalist like this idiot, Tucker or Hannity, or worse even yet a complete nutjob like Marge or a pedophile like Matt. So you honesty believe that these scientists were lying and your proof of that is some Austrailian loudmouth idiot babbling on with nonsense? If he said that your grandfather born you out his asshole would you believe that too? You dont rememeber being born so it must be true and nobody has talked about it so there must be a coverup!
What about you wait for all the investigations that are taking place in the many locations of Indian schools, instead of jumping on some Australian bandwagon.Hey there silly goose. You produced an article about a river unearthing graves in 1996 - graves that were known to exist. That had nothing whatever to do with whether any graves had been unearthed in connection with the recent claims of unmarked graves which have caused all the controversy. You were asked to produce proof. It was obvious that you furiously googled for a few minutes, and came up with nothing. Game. Set. Match.
If you're capable of learning from mistakes, the mistakes you are making include: a) thinking a fact can be positively established relying on the identity of someone with an opinion, when that opinion could easily be indisputably confirmed or dismissed by direct investigation, b) thinking that it matters who presents logical points, rather than whether those points are logical, c) not understanding the difference between an incorrect scientific opinion and a lie, and d) not understanding the difference between what a scientist actually says and what some non-scientist says who is interpreting their work.
I think you're right on both counts, but have directed your advice to the wrong poster.What about you wait for all the investigations that are taking place in the many locations of Indian schools, instead of jumping on some Australian bandwagon.
I have a suspicion that not much digging is taking place in Manitoba at this time of year.
The Liberals set a record for the lowest vote share of a party that would go on to form government, winning 32.6% of the popular vote, while losing the popular vote to the Conservatives as they did in 2019.[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Canadian_federal_election
I have many friends in USA, and they were unanimous in being jealous of Canada having Trudeau during the Trump years.This is true and I feel ashamed of myself that I ever supported this hypocrite back in 2016 because I was excited about marijuana legislation and though he actually cared about equality, people’s choice and will actually support this such as making this hobby legal and let consenting adults do what they want.
All this guy cares about is spinning his drivel and recontextualizing reality to support his ideology, control over people and telling them what to do and think that is far from reality and what is actually happening.
He is the laughing stock of the world. Just talk to people that live outside of Canada and they see our PM as a joke that has sold out his country and his morals.
This is just a long post of bullshit right-wing crap. First, did Trudeau "flee" or was he quarantined? Some dumb GOP official from Texas actually believed Trudeau fled to the US....I mean, come on. He did test positive for the 'rona. This would be like me saying Harper hid in a closet during the Parliament Hill shooting (well, he did, but that's only because the RCMP security team man handled him in there, and it wasn't like he was cowering).This is true and I feel ashamed of myself that I ever supported this hypocrite back in 2016 because I was excited about marijuana legislation and though he actually cared about equality, people’s choice and will actually support this such as making this hobby legal and let consenting adults do what they want.
All this guy cares about is spinning his drivel and recontextualizing reality to support his ideology, control over people and telling them what to do and think that is far from reality and what is actually happening.
He is the laughing stock of the world. Just talk to people that live outside of Canada and they see our PM as a joke that has sold out his country and his morals.
What a hypocrite...
View attachment 120259
View attachment 120260
View attachment 120261
...and to add insult to injury he thinks the he Canadian people are stupid and that he can tell them what to believe, think, and feel.
View attachment 120262
View attachment 120267
View attachment 120268
If he had the election today he lose in a heart beat and his pathetic record setting minority government that he believes represent the majority of Canadians and gives him the supreme power to tel Canadians what to think and feel. What a shame. I am so ashamed of myself for ever supporting this racist and divisive fck. We as Canadians deserve better.
He think he represents Canadians and thinks they are so stupid they will believe his propaganda...
OK so point a : what investigation did the Australian do to confirm that these scientific findings are false ?Hey there silly goose. You produced an article about a river unearthing graves in 1996 - graves that were known to exist. That had nothing whatever to do with whether any graves had been unearthed in connection with the recent claims of unmarked graves which have caused all the controversy. You were asked to produce proof. It was obvious that you furiously googled for a few minutes, and came up with nothing. Game. Set. Match.
If you're capable of learning from mistakes, the mistakes you are making include: a) thinking a fact can be positively established relying on the identity of someone with an opinion, when that opinion could easily be indisputably confirmed or dismissed by direct investigation, b) thinking that it matters who presents logical points, rather than whether those points are logical, c) not understanding the difference between an incorrect scientific opinion and a lie, and d) not understanding the difference between what a scientist actually says and what some non-scientist says who is interpreting their work.
I mean...compared to Trump, Trudeau is amazing. He's smart, articulate, thoughtful, not thin-skinned....I have many friends in USA, and they were unanimous in being jealous of Canada having Trudeau during the Trump years.
Anti-science lol…leave the rhetoric for politicians.I find you anti scientists to be a riot. Because some British idiot says they were tree roots you hop on board. Are you sure it wasnt fake Chinese ballots ?
Illogical is a word you should stop using in your posts. I don't think you know what it means.You trumpers are more illogical
Why, because they aren't as angry as you?Objective journalism has been all but dead in Canada for at least the past 6 years when Trudeau assumed office.
Unmarked graves that were known to exist by the native community but ignored by the church and government.Hey there silly goose. You produced an article about a river unearthing graves in 1996 - graves that were known to exist. That had nothing whatever to do with whether any graves had been unearthed in connection with the recent claims of unmarked graves which have caused all the controversy. You were asked to produce proof. It was obvious that you furiously googled for a few minutes, and came up with nothing. Game. Set. Match.
If you're capable of learning from mistakes, the mistakes you are making include: a) thinking a fact can be positively established relying on the identity of someone with an opinion, when that opinion could easily be indisputably confirmed or dismissed by direct investigation, b) thinking that it matters who presents logical points, rather than whether those points are logical, c) not understanding the difference between an incorrect scientific opinion and a lie, and d) not understanding the difference between what a scientist actually says and what some non-scientist says who is interpreting their work.
because journalism doesn’t pay anymore. The day journalism died was when Christiane Amanpour made the trump Holocaust comparison and spit on all the victims graves. I looked up to her so much and she inspired hope in victims of war and suffering.Why, because they aren't as angry as you?
You have rhe reasoning skills of a 10 year old lol I have a degree in philosophy which also included formal.logic but I guess you know better lolIllogical is a word you should stop using in your posts. I don't think you know what it means.
Is it too late to ask for a refund of your tuition? Surely your formal training covered Venn diagram based logical analysis, and the perils of negative inferences? Or the fallacy of "appeals to authority"? Or "projection"? If not, I'd say you were cheated! Or maybe you were properly instructed, but have forgotten everything you ever learned?You have rhe reasoning skills of a 10 year old lol I have a degree in philosophy which also included formal.logic but I guess you know better lol
LOL. First, from the start, journalism has always ben about disseminating messages from the powerful. They could be tools for one side of an argument, or the other. However, in our modern, mainstream media, that is not really the case, no matter how much you want to believe it. The only propaganda outlet are those that sway to far to the left or right. Fox News -- That is a propaganda station. It abdicated any semblance of balance coverage years ago to kiss Trump's ass. Even before that it wasn't exactly know for playing it straight. Say what you will about the other news orgs, CNN, NYT WaPo, ABC/NBC/CBS, but they do try to play it straight. They are not perfect, but are far superior to Fox.because journalism doesn’t pay anymore. The day journalism died was when Christiane Amanpour made the trump Holocaust comparison and spit on all the victims graves. I looked up to her so much and she inspired hope in victims of war and suffering.
Now all journalist are is propaganda tools and only disseminate the message that protects the interests of their biggest and most loyal investors
Israel Wants CNN's Christiane Amanpour to Apologize for Trump-Holocaust Comparison
Diaspora Affairs Minister Omer Yankelevitch says the anchor used "the memory of the Holocaust for cheap headlines or a political agenda"www.thewrap.com