Lawrence Martin (Globe) - Is Joe Biden doomed already after just one year?

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ unbelievable, bravo ..."Harris is very smart" ? - did you listen for ANY of her interviews ? / "very capable" ? - yeah, starting from her first assignment to fix the border ..๐Ÿคฃ She wasn't even selected by her own party, she had the worst ratings and had to drop out of the race. Her approval rating in her own state was 7% ....who are you kidding, dude...read something at least before posting nonsense
LOL. I have listened to her carefully and a lot. You obvsioly only listen to the critiques on Fox or OAN and not to her.
 

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
LOL. I have listened to her carefully and a lot. You obvsioly only listen to the critiques on Fox or OAN and not to her.
She's getting sh$t from her own party and state media for being absolutely incapable and incompetent...the latest most
pathetic interview was on MSNBC where the host was really sweet to her and yet all dems were in shock. The only thing
she's good at is that constant non-stop giggling...that's it
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
She's getting sh$t from her own party and state media for being absolutely incapable and incompetent...the latest most
pathetic interview was on MSNBC where the host was really sweet to her and yet all dems were in shock. The only thing
she's good at is that constant non-stop giggling...that's it
Only in the right wing echo chamber.
 
Last edited:

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
Only in the right wind echo chamber.
right wing chamber as below :



 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
right wing chamber as below :



I agree that here electoral prospects would be poor. That is entirely different then her intellect etc. Anyone who questions her intellect is obviously not listening to her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
I agree that here electoral prospects would be poor. That is entirely different then her intellect etc. Anyone who questions her intellect is obviously not listening to her.
indeed, do you want to go sentence by sentence on the nonsense she's spewing. In democrat party there is no need in intellect, just promise everyone free stuff, open border,
equality, diversity and inclusion and you are king of kings ...and even with these requirements she had to drop out of the race...
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
indeed, do you want to go sentence by sentence on the nonsense she's spewing. In democrat party there is no need in intellect, just promise everyone free stuff, open border,
equality, diversity and inclusion and you are king of kings ...and even with these requirements she had to drop out of the race...
Sure why don't you quote some of the nonsense she is speaking and while you are at it try and find one politician form any party in any country who has not made a gaffe. Your fearless leader said more idiotic things in 4 years than she will say in her lifetime. The problem is that he could say that 2=2=5 and you would believe it and defend it to the death.
 

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
Sure why don't you quote some of the nonsense she is speaking and while you are at it try and find one politician form any party in any country who has not made a gaffe. Your fearless leader said more idiotic things in 4 years than she will say in her lifetime. The problem is that he could say that 2=2=5 and you would believe it and defend it to the death.
I don't have a leader, dude. But comparing levels of incompetence I can clearly see current administration is a disaster:
South border pretty much open - 2mil illegal crossings (the ones that are detected), she was assigned on that task and failed
miserably - didn't even visited the border for months, and when she did it wasn't even the border. When asked about why she wouldn't
visit - " I wasn't also in Paris" ..or her press briefing in south america visit ....how she's trying to figure out the "root causes"
There is too much to mentioned...you are obviously blind
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,987
23,584
113
indeed, do you want to go sentence by sentence on the nonsense she's spewing. In democrat party there is no need in intellect, just promise everyone free stuff, open border,
equality, diversity and inclusion and you are king of kings ...and even with these requirements she had to drop out of the race...
Are you offended by her working towards equality, diversity and inclusion?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,080
5,199
113
I agree that here electoral prospects would be poor. That is entirely different then her intellect etc. Anyone who questions her intellect is obviously not listening to her.
Then I guess the MSM news isn't either. Because we are seeing regular articles now in various publications about her inability to communicate policy. And just as important her communication team is leaving because she is not taking briefings and then blaming them.

Sound familiar?

She sounds great when she has a script. That's her legal training in arguments. But she is ill prepared to take questions in interviews. She also was wooped in the debates. There is a Peter Principle at play here and I think it hit at Attorney General. Everything since she is a shit show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitehill_21

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,890
7,864
113
Well in the latest Opinion Polls, Harris seems to match Biden in the approval ratings. Obviously, she has taken a lot of stick for being the first female and woman of colour VP.
But give her time as there is the bias towards such people of colour, that will always take it's toll due to constant online abuses and stick especially from issues like immigration.
No doubt that over time she will be groomed to be the President once the inflation and this Pandemic are under control:



 

whitehill_21

Active member
May 23, 2007
515
108
43
Are you offended by her working towards equality, diversity and inclusion?
DIE is a Marxist myth that I had a "pleasure" to live through in former USSR where it was enforced
from above but in reality meant oppression. Equality meant equality of outcome, so everyone was
equally poor, diversity/inclusion meant we sort of all brothers but some brothers better than others,
so in universities, colleges and work places was a quota for specific ethnicities.....so seeing it all
here in North America is like a dejavu all over again
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
DIE is a Marxist myth that I had a "pleasure" to live through in former USSR where it was enforced
from above but in reality meant oppression. Equality meant equality of outcome, so everyone was
equally poor, diversity/inclusion meant we sort of all brothers but some brothers better than others,
so in universities, colleges and work places was a quota for specific ethnicities.....so seeing it all
here in North America is like a dejavu all over again
Equality of outcome became the equality of misery. Of course those who were in charge of implementing the "equality " were also exempt from it... and defending their privilege became the reason for their existence.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,987
23,584
113
Equality of outcome became the equality of misery. Of course those who were in charge of implementing the "equality " were also exempt from it... and defending their privilege became the reason for their existence.
Its equality of opportunities, not outcomes.
Wrong debate.

DIE is a Marxist myth that I had a "pleasure" to live through in former USSR
That has nothing to do with this debate.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
Now you're trying to backtrack and say that you now agree that the planet is warming, though you've argued that the numbers reported are wrong, the science is wrong, the scientists are wrong and everyone who agrees with them over you are also wrong.
Putting aside the repeated inaccuracies, it's noteworthy that Frankfooter thinks any warming that occurs must have been caused by human activity. Frankfooter must believe the Industrial Revolution occurred about 4.5 billion years ago. ๐Ÿ˜ฒ

Franky's posts often remind me of something Charles C.W. Cooke once wrote in National Review. That people who couldn't tell you the correct temperature for boiling water will suddenly claim to be authorities on science when it comes to man-made global warming.
 
Last edited:

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
Now you're trying to backtrack and say that you now agree that the planet is warming,
Nov. 15, 2015:
The Met Office numbers on your graph confirm what I said yesterday -- a temperature increase of about 1ยบC over 135 years.
April 2016:
Yes, the planet has experienced some warming over the past 350 years. But the observed data don't confirm the hypothesis that man-made emissions have been the dominant cause of warming since 1950.
Does Frankfooter know what year this is?? ๐Ÿค”
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,987
23,584
113
Putting aside the repeated inaccuracies, it's noteworthy that Frankfooter thinks any warming that occurs must have been caused by human activity. Frankfooter must believe the Industrial Revolution occurred about 4.5 billion years ago. ๐Ÿ˜ฒ
See, that's just the kind of logic failures one would expect from a science denier.
The moviefan logic must go something like this:
a) science says that humans are changing the climate
b) the climate has been around for billions of years
And when a science denier puts those two statements together its a + b = c) therefore science says humans caused all climate change forever

Its really amazing how your mind works.
No wonder you were so proud when you figured out how much more 5 was than 1.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Franky is a master at one thing- derailing threads. Here goes another one.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts