Blast of Global Warming in Early April
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
This is why you keep failing Grade 3.
Yes, we used 1995 as the starting point for calculating the IPCC's prediction.
But the bet was made in 2015! We already knew what the reported temperature anomalies were for the years from 1995 to 2014, and that the temperature had increased by 0.25ºC over that time period.
The question was whether it would increase by at least a further 0.15ºC in 2015 in order for you to win the bet.
It didn't. You lost.
You are contradicting yourself again, typical Dunning-Kruger effect thinking.
This is what you said the bet was based on before you started losing.
We did not bet on the difference between 2014-2015, that is an out and out lie.
Just like you continue to lie about the Fyfe paper.
canada-man, your argument has a major flaw. Can I summarize it? Your argument: "There is no climate change because it's cold where I am. Right now."
So glad I'm not living in Northern Ontario anymore. But I wonder how long this cold blast will last? It's like our seasons have been shifting to different months over the last 4 years. Gradually worse every year.
I don't know where the "indisputably" part comes from.
In the 21st century, the predictions about how man-made emissions would affect the Earth's temperature have been continuously and spectacularly wrong. That sure makes the "anthropogenic" part of the hypothesis disputable, if you ask me.
Yes, the planet has experienced some warming over the past 350 years. But the observed data don't confirm the hypothesis that man-made emissions have been the dominant cause of warming since 1950.
Again, the bet you lost showed that the IPCC projections are accurate and your claims nonsense.
This claim that the climate changes we've experienced recently has been covered repeatedly. Including the fact that 15 of the 16 warmest years recorded in human history have happened since 2000, the odds that the changes in the climate are natural have been calculated to be 0.01%. Its a total Dunning-Kruger statement to declare that you think these changes are natural given the record heat, a statement based on your ignorance and over confidence that your personal feelings are more correct then the findings of science.
http://www.theguardian.com/environm...possible-without-manmade-climate-change-study
And once again, you claim its not man made yet can't back this up with evidence, a theory that isn't comical, or a legit paper. When shown, repeatedly, the bloomberg page that shows the possible forcings that could influence the climate all you do is ignore it and keep on with your ignorant statements.
http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-world/
You lied about the Fyfe paper, lied about the bet and continue to make ignorant statements.
