BREAKING: CBC producer quits, slams woke broadcaster for failing to cover issues important to Canadians

[poker]

You are like talking to a brick wall. I explained to you how you should read "questioning" and why. I guess it was lost on you.

And why in Gods name do you feel the need to explain anything to me? I can read the rule myself. It’s fairly basic actually. If a Mod has a problem with me, they will let me know.

Besides, I don’t really take advice from people I don’t respect.

What you did, was change the definition to fit your agenda.

 

[bver_hunter]

Wrong again! You're still struggling to understand the meaning of the word "incorrect."

In fact, Mann is NOT a "Nobel winner."

By the way, Franky, the word "syntax" refers to how words are placed in phrases and sentences. The word you were looking for in your erroneous sentences in posts 151 and 156 was "semantics."

So once again using Moviefan's logic....... No Canadian Ice Hockey Players won a Gold Medal at the Olympics. Only Canada won, as they are the official winners of that trophy. We all now get moivefan's logic!!

 

[bver_hunter]

Now Tara Henley goes to Fox News of all News Broadcasts, yes to air her grievances. So this is what she says:

Producer exits Canada’s public broadcaster over ‘radical political agenda,’ says CBC abandoned integrity
Tara Henley torches CBC for pretending 'woke' worldview is universal

A veteran producer has resigned from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, claiming in a scathing column that the network abandoned journalistic integrity to embrace a "woke" worldview and "a radical political agenda that originated on Ivy League campuses in the United States."

Tara Henley, a now-former TV and radio producer, penned an entry on Substack on why she left the CBC, detailing a newsroom stifled by far-left ideology that limits critical thinking and obsesses over race.

"For months now, I’ve been getting complaints about the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation," she wrote. "People want to know why, for example, non-binary Filipinos concerned about a lack of LGBT terms in Tagalog is an editorial priority for the CBC, when local issues of broad concern go unreported. Or why our pop culture radio show’s coverage of the Dave Chappelle Netflix special failed to include any of the legions of fans, or comics, that did not find it offensive. Or why, exactly, taxpayers should be funding articles that scold Canadians for using words such as ‘brainstorm’ and ‘lame.’"

Producer exits Canada’s public broadcaster over ‘radical political agenda,’ says CBC abandoned integrity

Tara Henley, a now-former TV and radio producer for the CBC, claims the network abandoned journalistic integrity to embrace a "woke" worldview and "a radical political agenda that originated on Ivy League campuses in the United States."

www.foxnews.com

Now we all know where her political ideologies lie especially as:

2 Fox News commentators resign over Tucker Carlson series on the Jan. 6 siege

Two longtime conservative Fox News commentators have resigned in protest of what they call a pattern of incendiary and fabricated claims by the network's opinion hosts in support of former President Donald Trump.

In separate interviews with NPR, Stephen Hayes and Jonah Goldberg pointed to a breaking point this month: network star Tucker Carlson's three-part series on the Jan. 6 siege of the U.S. Capitol, which relied on fabrications and conspiracy theories to exonerate the Trump supporters who participated in the attack.

"It's basically saying that the Biden regime is coming after half the country and this is the War on Terror 2.0," Goldberg tells NPR. "It traffics in all manner of innuendo and conspiracy theories that I think legitimately could lead to violence. That for me, and for Steve, was the last straw."

They were obviously disgusted by Tucker Carlson's Fake Documentary called Patriot Purge that accused the Government with going to a war against the "Patriotic" Ones that caused the January 6th insurrection:

On the Friday before the release of Patriot Purge, Baier aired a segment on the investigation of the insurrection by veteran national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin. Featured interviews dismissed claims of a "false-flag attack" — that is, violent left-wing activists such as antifa pretending to be Trump fans as they attacked the Capitol.

Wallace broadcast an interview on Fox News Sunday with Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, one of the chief Republican critics of Trump who's similarly rejecting those false claims. She is one of just two GOP members of the House committee investigating the insurrection at the Capitol.

Patriot Purge relied on known peddlers of unfounded conspiracy theories, people who sought out the company of white supremacists who would not be cited as credible sources by Fox's reporting teams.

Goldberg said he and Hayes could no longer tolerate the wild claims beamed, broadcast and streamed on Fox News.

2 Fox News commentators resign over Tucker Carlson series on the Jan. 6 siege

Stephen Hayes and Jonah Goldberg have resigned after the Fox News star hosted a series that relied on fabrications and conspiracy theories about the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

www.npr.org

Not so long ago when these two Fox Personnel that had some integrity to resign over the most FAKE Documentary from Carlson, were scathingly attacked by the same ones defending Tara Henley's decision and Point of View. Yet they cannot come up with any logical explanation as to how "Far Left" the CBC is, when we now know that The Fox News Network is by a mile more Extremist a news network than the CBC!!

 

[Frankfooter]

In fact, Mann is NOT a "Nobel winner."

Yup, you're still trying to slam the IPCC, Gore and Mann for winning the Nobel.
That's all you've got left now, isn't it?

The award went to the IPCC and Al Gore.

Since you can't argue the facts of climate change.
The past 7 years have been the hottest on record "by a clear margin," scientists say

 

[Moviefan-2]

So once again using Moviefan's logic.......

Wow! You genuinely believe the Nobel Institute is run by me?

In case you didn't see it, here is the quiz I posted for you earlier today. I still consider it to be an easy quiz that shouldn't take long.

Here are two opposing responses to Mann's legal document that said Mann and his fellow researchers "were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize."

Tell us which position you think is correct.

Position 1 - Mann's statement was "incorrect."

Supported by:
- An official with the Nobel committee
- Geir Lundestad, the Nobel Institute's director at that time
- National Review magazine
- The IPCC
- Michael Mann

Position 2 - Mann's statement was correct.

Supported by:
- Frankfooter

Good luck. We look forward to seeing your answer.

 

[Frankfooter]

Tell us which position you think is correct.

Science denier script item #4
denigrates real experts

Which is why you will keep trying to avoid answering to why the planet is warming when you claimed it wouldn't.
The past 7 years have been the hottest on record "by a clear margin," scientists say

 

[bver_hunter]

Wow! You genuinely believe the Nobel Institute is run by me?

In case you didn't see it, here is the quiz I posted for you earlier today. I still consider it to be an easy quiz that shouldn't take long.

Here are two opposing responses to Mann's legal document that said Mann and his fellow researchers "were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize."

Tell us which position you think is correct.

Position 1 - Mann's statement was "incorrect."

Supported by:
- An official with the Nobel committee
- Geir Lundestad, the Nobel Institute's director at that time
- National Review magazine
- The IPCC
- Michael Mann

Position 2 - Mann's statement was correct.

Supported by:
- Frankfooter

Good luck. We look forward to seeing your answer.

Again, Mann was instrumental in the IPCC winning the Noble Prize as even the link that You posted stated that he was the "LEAD AUTHOR" of Chapter 2.
So it was the IPCC that jointly won the award with Al Gore, who followed the guidelines of Mann in his quest for a Global Greener Energy. This is what Frankfooter was stating.

The IPCC acknowledged that his work, along with that of the many other lead authors and review editors, contributed to the award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize, which was won jointly by the IPCC and Al Gore.

.

Michael E. Mann - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In other words, he CONTRIBUTED to the Nobel Peace Prize. All he originally claimed was that he "SHARED", the Peace Prize with the other authors. This was not strictly true as the IPCC shared it with Al Gore. But do You think that it is false to claim that he "Contributed" to the Peace prize?

So You think that Al gore should get 50% of the credit for the work? Again you will not respond to this question!!

The IPCC categorically stated that Mann was the Lead Author of that Chapter 2, that was instrumental in winning the Nobel Prize, and hence the IPCC won it. This is no different from the Captain of Canada's Ice Hockey team leading the Canadian Team to the Gold medal at the Olympic Games.

So just answer a very simple question as it is a direct comparison for both the types of awards:

When the Canadian Ice Hockey players are instrumental in Canada being awarded The Gold Medal at the Olympic Games, then is it true or false for them to claim that they were the "Gold Medal Winners" at the Games? Simple question and cannot wait to hear Your response as you keep posing questions the whole time but not responding to any of mine!!

By the way Mann's Court case against Steyn is still outstanding so he has not lost any Court case as yet:

Judge Scales Back Climate Scientist's Case Against Bloggers - Inside Climate News

A Washington, D.C. judge has ruled that the conservative think tank the Competitive Enterprise Institute cannot be held responsible for an outside blogger’s 2012 online attack on a prominent climate scientist. At the same time, the judge decided that a jury should decide whether the blogger...

insideclimatenews.org

 

[Frankfooter]

Again, Mann was instrumental in the IPCC winning the Noble Prize as even the link that You posted stated that he was the "LEAD AUTHOR" of Chapter 2.
So it was the IPCC that jointly won the award with Al Gore, who followed the guidelines of Mann in his quest for a Global Greener Energy. This is what Frankfooter was stating.

.

Michael E. Mann - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In other words, he CONTRIBUTED to the Nobel Peace Prize. All he originally claimed was that he "SHARED", the Peace Prize with the other authors. This was not strictly true as the IPCC shared it with Al Gore. But do You think that it is false to claim that he "Contributed" to the Peace prize?

So You think that Al gore should get 50% of the credit for the work? Again you will not respond to this question!!

The IPCC categorically stated that Mann was the Lead Author of that Chapter 2, that was instrumental in winning the Nobel Prize, and hence the IPCC won it. This is no different from the Captain of Canada's Ice Hockey team leading the Canadian Team to the Gold medal at the Olympic Games.

So just answer a very simple question as it is a direct comparison for both the types of awards:

When the Canadian Ice Hockey players are instrumental in Canada being awarded The Gold Medal at the Olympic Games, then is it true or false for them to claim that they were the "Gold Medal Winners" at the Games? Simple question and cannot wait to hear Your response as you keep posing questions the whole time but not responding to any of mine!!

By the way Mann's Court case against Steyn is still outstanding so he has not lost any Court case as yet:

Judge Scales Back Climate Scientist's Case Against Bloggers - Inside Climate News

A Washington, D.C. judge has ruled that the conservative think tank the Competitive Enterprise Institute cannot be held responsible for an outside blogger’s 2012 online attack on a prominent climate scientist. At the same time, the judge decided that a jury should decide whether the blogger...

insideclimatenews.org

Moviefan is trolling, trying to 'denigrate an expert' to keep the conversation away from the evidence.

 

[Leimonis]

AndrewX just got called out as Cantaro by the Mods. I would not be trusting his nonesense

I will be missing their posts about voter fraud

 

[JohnLarue]

Except I did not question the Mod. I pointed out to members something that happened.

Clearly, you do not understand what “Questioning” means. Here, I will give an example…

Are you, DutchOven, and JohnLarue the same person using 2 handles?

You see, that is me questioning someone, or their decision.

No that is an accusation that I and DutchOven are misrepresenting ourselves

Do not do that

 

[Leimonis]

Given that people who insist they "follow the science" are supposed to believe in evidence-based conclusions, here is a test for bver_hunter.

Here are two opposing responses to Mann's legal document that said Mann and his fellow researchers "were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize."

This is a simple multiple-choice test. Tell us which position you think is correct.

Position 1 - Mann's statement was "incorrect."

Supported by:
- An official with the Nobel committee
- Geir Lundestad, the Nobel Institute's director at that time
- National Review magazine
- The IPCC
- Michael Mann

Position 2 - Mann's statement was correct.

Supported by:
- Frankfooter

I would like to believe this is a pretty easy test.

Good luck. We look forward to seeing your answer.

Way to argue irrelevant point lol

 

[Frankfooter]

Way to argue irrelevant point lol

its all part of the science denier script. Its the same for anti vaxxers, flat earthers and other science deniers.

Every science denier cherry picks data, believes in conspiracy theories, engages in illogical reasoning, relies on fake experts and denigrates real experts, and here's my favourite: that science has to be perfect in order to be credible.

johnlarue follows the same script, but he sticks to 2, 3, 4 and 5 on that list. He'll slam the IPCC then cherry pick quotes from a political scientist like Rielke Jr then copy and paste illogical thinking and claims about CO2 and IR radiation.

Moviefan prefers 3,4 and 5. He doesn't get as far as actual reasoning and doesn't voice conspiracy theories.

Meanwhile both won't or can't answer to points like the last 7 years were the 7 warmest years humans have ever recorded or that the last time CO2 was this high the oceans were 90 feet higher.
We are so F*cked unless we act Now: The 7 Hottest Years on Record were the last 7 Years

 

[Moviefan-2]

In other words, he CONTRIBUTED to the Nobel Peace Prize. All he originally claimed was that he "SHARED", the Peace Prize with the other authors. This was not strictly true as the IPCC shared it with Al Gore.

This is hilarious. The guy who insists we should listen to the experts continues to ignore the official decisions, constantly wanting to pivot to my opinion.

To begin with, Mann didn't merely claim he "contributed" to the report. In his legal filing, he said he was "awarded" the Nobel Prize.

Quote from point 2 in the introduction: "As a result of this research, Dr. Mann and his colleagues were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize."

https://legaltimes.typepad.com/files/michael-mann-complaint.pdf

The Nobel Institute responded to this and the IPCC issued a subsequent statement confirming the Nobel Institute's decision. The Nobel Institute said it was "incorrect" to say that any contributor to the report was a Nobel Prize winner.

Michael Mann’s False Nobel Claim | National Review

This morning, I called the Nobel Committee in Norway and asked whether Michael Mann had won a Nobel Peace Prize. The answer was a pretty emphatic “No.” Here is the call (apologies for poor quality …

www.nationalreview.com

The IPCC also said it was "incorrect": "The prize was awarded to the IPCC as an organization, and not to any individual associated with the IPCC. Thus it is incorrect to refer to any IPCC official, or scientist who worked on IPCC reports, as a Nobel laureate or Nobel Prize winner."

The IPCC weighs in on the Mann Nobel dilemma, and throws him under the bus

This statement was issued today from the IPCC, which appears to be inspired by the recent claims of Dr. Michael Mann in the lawsuit against NRO that we discussed here and here. The colored bold tex…

wattsupwiththat.com

But do You think that it is false to claim that he "Contributed" to the Peace prize?

The Nobel Institute says it is false.

The IPCC also says it is false.

"The prize was awarded to the IPCC as an organization, and not to any individual associated with the IPCC."

I support the decisions from the Nobel Institute and the IPCC that what Mann said was false.

Are you saying the Nobel Institute and the IPCC were wrong?

Please clarify.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Way to argue irrelevant point lol

Blame bver_hunter and Frankfooter. It was bver_hunter who raised the issue of the fake Nobel Laureate's credibility and Frankfooter who insisted on seeing all of the quotes and supporting links.

The only reason this continues to get dragged out is because the two self-declared believers in the science refuse to concede they were completely wrong.

Of course, Franky's still trying to figure out the meaning of the word, "syntax."

 

[Frankfooter]

Blame bver_hunter and Frankfooter. It was bver_hunter who raised the issue of the fake Nobel Laureate's credibility and Frankfooter who insisted on seeing all of the quotes and supporting links.

The only reason this continues to get dragged out is because the two self-declared believers in the science refuse to concede they were completely wrong.

Of course, Franky's still trying to figure out the meaning of the word, "syntax."

The only reason this is ongoing is because you are following the science denier script and denigrating experts because you can't debate the science of the evidence.
Every science denier cherry picks data, believes in conspiracy theories, engages in illogical reasoning, relies on fake experts and denigrates real experts, and here's my favourite: that science has to be perfect in order to be credible.

Remember when you said the planet wouldn't warm past 0.83ºC?
That's why you refuse to discuss the climate, all you can do is resort to picayune attacks on experts.

The past 7 years have been the hottest on record "by a clear margin," scientists say

 

[Moviefan-2]

The only reason this is ongoing is because you are following the science denier script and denigrating experts...

This appears to be another problem with "syntax."

In fact, it was bver_hunter who started the debate about Mann's credibility. And you were the one who insisted on seeing the quotes and the sources.

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/breaking-cbc-producer-quits-slams-woke-broadcaster-for-failing-to-cover-issues-important-to-canadians.769640/page-8#post-7347072

The Nobel Institute and the IPCC both said Mann's statements that he was "awarded" the Nobel Prize were false.

Yes or no: Do you accept the decisions from the Nobel Institute and the IPCC that Mann's statements were false?

Yes or no.

 

[Frankfooter]

Yes or no: Do you accept the Nobel Institute and the IPCC's decisions and that you were wrong.

Yes or no, are you a science denier who has stated on this board that no scientific evidence can sway you from your views?
Yes or no, are you denigrating experts because you can't answer to the evidence and the science?
Yes or no, is the planet warming up more than you stated it would?
Yes or no, would you ever admit you are wrong?

 

[poker]

its all part of the science denier script. Its the same for anti vaxxers, flat earthers and other science deniers.

Every science denier cherry picks data, believes in conspiracy theories, engages in illogical reasoning, relies on fake experts and denigrates real experts, and here's my favourite: that science has to be perfect in order to be credible.

johnlarue follows the same script, but he sticks to 2, 3, 4 and 5 on that list. He'll slam the IPCC then cherry pick quotes from a political scientist like Rielke Jr then copy and paste illogical thinking and claims about CO2 and IR radiation.

Moviefan prefers 3,4 and 5. He doesn't get as far as actual reasoning and doesn't voice conspiracy theories.

Meanwhile both won't or can't answer to points like the last 7 years were the 7 warmest years humans have ever recorded or that the last time CO2 was this high the oceans were 90 feet higher.
We are so F*cked unless we act Now: The 7 Hottest Years on Record were the last 7 Years

Wait a minute. Are you suggesting when Larue posts about “satellite data” and “atmospheric temperatures”….(and not surface temp)… That is a tactic??? But if we don’t pay attention atmosphere temp, how will we fight forest fires in the atmosphere? Or atmospheric glacier melt?

 

[Moviefan-2]

Yes or no, would you ever admit you are wrong?

I'm not the one who said it was "pure bullshit" and demanded to see quotes and proof.

This claim sounds like pure bullshit.
Post a link and a direct quote from the Nobels, please.

The quotes and links to the original sources were provided, at great length.

Yes or no: Do you accept the decisions from the Nobel Institute and the IPCC that Mann's statements were false?

Yes or no.

 

[y2kmark]

That link you posted was in total contradiction of what Trenberth lectured in New Zealand and I posted an actual link of it. Have you reviewed it? If not, then You should scrutinize it, as I posted exactly what the topic subject was about, and that was fully in line with Mann's Research. Hence that original link of yours bore no substance at all.

Now in this Guardian article, all he is doing is stating that the Arctic Glacier melting etc., does play a role but is the unlikely to be the cause. In other words it is nothing to do with Climate Change / Greenhouse Gases and the impact on Storms or Hurricanes that he does believe in. After all this was the subject of his presentation in New Zealand!!

So melting glaciers don't themselves contribute to global warming, just to rising sea levels. How comforting...