I, for one, rather judge a country on its Public broadcasting than on its military.
BREAKING: CBC producer quits, slams woke broadcaster for failing to cover issues important to Canadians
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
Yeah OK, lets have Rosemary Barton protect our sovereign in the artic
She can do a two hour special where she scolds the Russians, Danes, Americans and British for their claims/ designs on our sovereign
She can sue them in Canadian court when they tell her to piss off
She has no qualms about suing a political leader and then pretending she is objective
Our military is a joke because it it has been under financed, however when called upon the soldiers have historically punched above their weight and they helped a lot of people
Our Public Broadcaster on the other hand has become a bought and paid for propaganda mill for the liberal party and they have abandoned any notion of journalistic integrity
Judge away
In that specific case: Yes, he was. As did other like-minded climate researchers.
Denmark and Canada are both members of Nato, so I trust
the crisis will be handled without war.
Last edited:
In addition to his bullshit elsewhere, Mann's falsely claimed that he was a "recipient" and "co-recipient" of the Nobel Prize in a legal filing in Mann's court case with conservative pundit Mark Steyn and others. Mann had to subsequently withdraw the application and resubmit it with the false statements removed after the Nobel committee confirmed it was total bullshit.
From the Nobel committee: "No, no. He has never won the Nobel prize."
"The organization won it. It’s not a personal prize to people belonging to an organization."
Michael Mann’s False Nobel Claim | National Review
This morning, I called the Nobel Committee in Norway and asked whether Michael Mann had won a Nobel Peace Prize. The answer was a pretty emphatic “No.” Here is the call (apologies for poor quality …
www.nationalreview.com
Mann claimed on Facebook there was "some confusion" about whether he could say he was a "co-recipient" of a Nobel Prize.
Think about it. Have you ever heard of a serious scientist who experiences "confusion" about whether or not he has been awarded a Nobel Prize?
Wouldn't you think a so-called leading expert on the future of the planet would know whether or not he has ever received a Nobel Prize?
Show us a link that he was!! Then why shortly after that he gave a lecture that was totally inline with what Mann's Research indicated?
No a vast number of Climate Researchers fully agree with Mann!!
Once again He was part of the Research team that was awarded the Nobel Prize. Period!! Do You think without him and the rest of those who contributed to it, the Nobel Prize would have been awarded?In addition to his bullshit elsewhere, Mann's falsely claimed that he was a "recipient" and "co-recipient" of the Nobel Prize in a legal filing in Mann's court case with conservative pundit Mark Steyn and others. Mann had to subsequently withdraw the application and resubmit it with the false statements removed after the Nobel committee confirmed it was total bullshit.
From the Nobel committee: "No, no. He has never won the Nobel prize."
"The organization won it. It’s not a personal prize to people belonging to an organization."
Michael Mann’s False Nobel Claim | National Review
This morning, I called the Nobel Committee in Norway and asked whether Michael Mann had won a Nobel Peace Prize. The answer was a pretty emphatic “No.” Here is the call (apologies for poor quality …
Mann claimed on Facebook there was "some confusion" about whether he could say he was a "co-recipient" of a Nobel Prize.
Think about it. Have you ever heard of a serious scientist who experiences "confusion" about whether or not he has been awarded a Nobel Prize?
Wouldn't you think a so-called leading expert on the future of the planet would know whether or not he has ever received a Nobel Prize?
If a player is part of a winning team that is awarded the Olympic Gold Medal for say Soccer, are You ever going to deny the fact that he won a Gold medal at the Olympic Games?
Are You going to dispute it and tell him that the team won and he did not win it? Seriously? Why should this be such an issue with a bunch of Climate Change deniers?
But The most esteemed award for Environmental Science was awarded to this individual:
Last edited:
Looks like the unvarnished truth has become increasingly harder for you to accept...
I already did. However, here's a link to an article from the Guardian. It doesn't specifically mention Mann but it once again has Trenberth questioning the statements that were being made about the cold weather in the northeast.
Extreme winter weather becoming more common as Arctic warms, study finds
Scientists found a strong link between high temperatures near the pole and unusually heavy snowfall and frigid weather farther south.
www.theguardian.com
The official response to the first question from the Nobel committee:
"No, no. He has never won the Nobel prize."
"The organization won it. It’s not a personal prize to people belonging to an organization."
Michael Mann’s False Nobel Claim | National Review
This morning, I called the Nobel Committee in Norway and asked whether Michael Mann had won a Nobel Peace Prize. The answer was a pretty emphatic “No.” Here is the call (apologies for poor quality …
www.nationalreview.com
The "dispute" came from the Nobel committee, which categorically rejected Mann's claims in a legal filing that he was a "recipient" or "co-recipient" of a Nobel prize. Furthermore, Mann was forced to refile his application after the court learned of the false statements.
Why is it an issue?
It speaks to credibility. It is extremely difficult to believe that Mann doesn't know what the word "recipient" means. A so-called leading scientist who fabricates things that can be easily checked has no serious credibility.
Perhaps that explains Mann's influence on today's politicians. After more than 20 years of Mann's predictions of apocalyptic doom, not a single major country anywhere on this planet is following his recommendations.
In fact, the International Energy Agency has estimated that coal production hit an all-time high in 2021.
The World Generated More Power From Coal in 2021 Than Ever Before
The all-time high means that the world's climate targets may be getting further out of reach
As well, International Banker says the demand for coal "soared" in the E.U. in 2021.
Why Prices of EU Carbon Permits Are at Record Highs
The impact of rising natural-gas prices in Europe is reaching beyond households as power-generation demand for coal surges, causing a scramble for carbon permits, with their prices breaking records. Beset by government action and supply shortages, EU Allowances will likely continue to be hot...
internationalbanker.com
You can blather on about "deniers" all you want. The reality is Mann only preaches to the devout faithful and has had no significant influence on energy production on this planet.
Russia is not a member of NATO
Do you trust them to take a good scolding from Rosemary Barton and then back off?
Michael Mann is fraud, an embarrassment for science and a nasty piece of workThink about it. Have you ever heard of a serious scientist who experiences "confusion" about whether or not he has been awarded a Nobel Prize?
Wouldn't you think a so-called leading expert on the future of the planet would know whether or not he has ever received a Nobel Prize?
That link you posted was in total contradiction of what Trenberth lectured in New Zealand and I posted an actual link of it. Have you reviewed it? If not, then You should scrutinize it, as I posted exactly what the topic subject was about, and that was fully in line with Mann's Research. Hence that original link of yours bore no substance at all.I already did. However, here's a link to an article from the Guardian. It doesn't specifically mention Mann but it once again has Trenberth questioning the statements that were being made about the cold weather in the northeast.
Extreme winter weather becoming more common as Arctic warms, study finds
Scientists found a strong link between high temperatures near the pole and unusually heavy snowfall and frigid weather farther south.
Now in this Guardian article, all he is doing is stating that the Arctic Glacier melting etc., does play a role but is the unlikely to be the cause. In other words it is nothing to do with Climate Change / Greenhouse Gases and the impact on Storms or Hurricanes that he does believe in. After all this was the subject of his presentation in New Zealand!!
The first link I posted had Trenberth explicitly challenging what Mann was saying -- and you know it.
The previously mentioned Roger Pielke had a tremendous line years ago. I think it was when the controversy about the fake "Nobel Prize" blew up.
I'm paraphrasing but the essence of it was: If Michael Mann didn't exist, climate skeptics would have to invent him.
The first link called "Tallbloke Walkout". Bahahahahaha!! That is more like a wishy washy blog for the Climate Change Deniers!! Post another link where he disputes it. I know You cannot as that link was fake.
Also, You have not explained why Trenberth did a presentation after that so called "specified time" claiming that Climate Change was caused by Human Activities, Carbon Dioxide and Greenhouse Gases in the atmosphere, resulting in more severe weather!!
Okay all I can say in layman's terms is the following. Using that logic that the individual who did all the Research resulting in Al Gore and IPCC receiving the Nobel Prize, means that no Canadian Ice Hockey players to be more specific, have won a Gold medal for Ice Hockey. Only Canada did win it.The official response to the first question from the Nobel committee:
"No, no. He has never won the Nobel prize."
"The organization won it. It’s not a personal prize to people belonging to an organization."
Michael Mann’s False Nobel Claim | National Review
This morning, I called the Nobel Committee in Norway and asked whether Michael Mann had won a Nobel Peace Prize. The answer was a pretty emphatic “No.” Here is the call (apologies for poor quality …
The "dispute" came from the Nobel committee, which categorically rejected Mann's claims in a legal filing that he was a "recipient" or "co-recipient" of a Nobel prize. Furthermore, Mann was forced to refile his application after the court learned of the false statements.
Why is it an issue?
It speaks to credibility. It is extremely difficult to believe that Mann doesn't know what the word "recipient" means. A so-called leading scientist who fabricates things that can be easily checked has no serious credibility.
Perhaps that explains Mann's influence on today's politicians. After more than 20 years of Mann's predictions of apocalyptic doom, not a single major country anywhere on this planet is following his recommendations.
In fact, the International Energy Agency has estimated that coal production hit an all-time high in 2021.
The World Generated More Power From Coal in 2021 Than Ever Before
The all-time high means that the world's climate targets may be getting further out of reachtime.com
As well, International Banker says the demand for coal "soared" in the E.U. in 2021.
Why Prices of EU Carbon Permits Are at Record Highs
The impact of rising natural-gas prices in Europe is reaching beyond households as power-generation demand for coal surges, causing a scramble for carbon permits, with their prices breaking records. Beset by government action and supply shortages, EU Allowances will likely continue to be hot...
You can blather on about "deniers" all you want. The reality is Mann only preaches to the devout faithful and has had no significant influence on energy production on this planet.
So Al Gore did a remarkable job, and we have to give him 50% of the credit and 50% goes to the IPCC. We should commend both of them for a remarkable job. Agreed?
Again he was awarded the Tyler Prize Laureate for the Environmental Science in 2019. If he was was so "bad" at his Research why was he awarded such a highly esteemed award for Environmental Science. Tell us which Climate Denial Scientist that You respect was also awarded that prize? We know that the hypocritical Fuel fossil companies were always out to get him in anyway, yet they are the ones that have tried to hide the studies that corroborate that evidence of fossil fuels and it's damage to the environment. They have no credibility or leg to stand on!!
We can continue to increase the coal usage but what we are seeing in Climate disasters around the Globe is unprecedented in the scale at which it is affecting numerous countries including the USA and Canada. No one can deny that fact!!
Same with sports teams, they should never be allowed to say they are champions or won everything.
Right?
Same idea.
The amount of incredibly basic logic fails you post on this board is outstanding.
But what's even more fun is that you will never admit its faulty logic, bad math or just plain wrong.
So tell us why you think Fred Van Vleet should stop claiming he won the NBA championship like Mann should stop saying he won the Nobel.
