Did any of the video evidence show him confronting anyone with malintent? Nope. Every video instance showed him being pursued or threatened with violence. In particular we see him being chased and knocked down by one guy. Then another guy comes and hits him with a skateboard. Another stomps on him. And then a guy confronts him with a loaded gun. What the fuck is the kid supposed to do here? Its shoot or be killed.
Kyle Rittenhouse trial
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
- Status
I said I would probably shoot to save my sorry ass. However as far as malintent, the testimony was that people started getting pissed at him and his cohort. They were yelling at him and his other armed companion to quit pointing their lasers at them. The prosecution indicated that they were referring to the laser sights on their weapons. That was where things started to go sour.
He is not authorized to STAND UP. It is not his job. It is none of his business. He is not authorized to take charge. That's why civilians shouldn't try to be cops, when cops are on duty. Things can go wrong. People can get killed.
Because the police never kill anyone…..
it’s none of your business what he or anyone else does he had as much right as anyone else to be there carrying anything he felt like that the state allows.
Yet you just said...
Canada's laws make a hell of a lot more sense. Anyone who wants a firearm must have a background check and a safety course.
That was explicitly designed and optimized to kill or injure things.
BTW. In the robotic era, guns can be automated. Doe sthe US have laws against that?
Might it have something to do with mandatory safety courses, universal background checks, and it being illegal to carry guns in most public environments?
But thanks for making my argument for me.
Are you saying that one secure facility is less safe than every individual having to arrange their own storage? Only reason to justify a handgun being stored at home would be self defence which is not a legal reason to own a gun here.
So he wasn't doing anything illegal except the things he was doing illegally? Could it be that the other curfew breakers aren't on trial because they didn't kill anyone?
He wasn’t charged with breaking curfew nor was anyone else
Ranges are in the middle of absolute nowhere storage in the middle of nowhere would be a very easy target and nothing is secure. they are more secure in individuals homes where no one knows where they are and they’re not a threat in individuals homes nor have they ever been in Canada
It is humorous how you guys fixate on antifa as being responsible for anything you don't like. Do you think it makes you look more stable than people freaking out about communists?
Wrong again it’s designed to propel a projectile
as far as robotic guns no law that I am aware of but then I’m not a lawyer
And the lunacy continues. Seuss wasn't cancelled. The people with the publishing rights chose to no longer publish a couple books that few people had even heard of. But I guess all your complaining about Marxists includes bitching that a company made their own decision.
As has been said endlessly, KR didn't have any property there and no one asked him to defend their property.
but ill use your line about guns
except they were designed for military purposes which was to blow troops up
Last edited:
Like break curfew and carry an gun illegally?
And sorry but those other people had just as much right to be there.
exactly I'm not the one arguing he should not have been there. gun charges were dismissed guy with pistol who attacked kyle was carrying with an expired permit
- Status
