Sorry, but I can't stop laughing. If you tell me that you are sensitive and find them hurtful I will stop.
I'm assuming that the judges and state legislators do understand the issues and affidavits and they keep bitch-slapping him. Hahahaha.
BTW, why are you ignoring the final decisions? Maybe they are not for your consumption?
I'll humour you a little.
1. Please type Hahahaha as often as you like. It doesn't bother me, and I'd hate to undermine whatever satisfaction it might give you.
2(a). You'd always be wrong to assume anything of any importance. A number of judges have dismissed motions for emergency relief. There are many cases, and I haven't reviewed them all in detail, but I didn't notice any decisions which dismissed the underlying action. If there have been, those suits must have been about very minor issues raised by other parties (not the Trump campaign). Different information was attached to each motion, depending upon the issues raised (some were pure legal arguments, some rely on facts, some allege fraud, some do not), the parties bringing the motion, and state of investigation into the underlying facts at that particular date. There are a few decisions which are explicitly critical of the factual support offered for the specific remedies that were requested. They all have to be evaluated on an individual basis, and should not be confused with any determination of the final merits of the suits filed, or as closing the door to putting more evidence before the court (as long as that evidence could not have been available at the time of the initial motion ruling) in a fresh motion.
2(b) State legislators are just beginning the process of hearing the arguments of the campaign in favour of de-certification, and I have yet to see the issue be resolved in any of the applicable state legislatures. It doesn't have to be dealt with until the date that the states have to appoint their electors. Arizona is just hearing the arguments from the Trump team today. If you watched any of these hearings, you would have seen that the Repulican legislators from the relevant states seemed to find the Trump team's arguments to be quite persuasive (that certainly appeared to be the case in Pennsylvania, and appears to be heading that way in Arizona. I believe Michigan is later this week). That could matter in states where the GOP have legislative control.
3. Not only are the decisions you are prone to reference not "final decisions" (because they are rulings on motions for emergency relief, not on the actions themselves), they are subject to appeal (and a number have been appealed), and some may be appealed as far as SCOTUS. I'm not hiding that the courts are making rulings as we go. In fact, my first post in the thread provided you with a link where you can follow along and read decisions as they are released.
