36 European countries did better than Sweden and that proves that masks don't work?
That's a logically questionable statement. Moreover there was no one insulted & named.
Unattainable dream, but maybe mommy will suspend his internet privileges so we won't have to listen for awhile...
I think that it's a reasonable question. It's not a trick. Just wondering what would convince him.
Here's a "trick" question: there are two ways a virus enters the human body. You got the respiratory system covered(with the cheap, untested covering); what's the other one? Something one should consider on a packed TTC vehicle, but the "scientists" in Ontario are not even mentioning nor the packed city transit, btw.
Here's a trick answer. Seeing as Phil keeps refuting any info which shows that masks make a difference, I'd like for him to tell us what data would convince him that masks are efficacious.
So, you don't know. As for the masks everyone is sporting. They're mostly of a psychological value as they're not capable of stopping the spread of virus because, simply, they were never designed for it. The size of the virus ensures that it passes right through them. It's nice that people wear them, it puts everything in the right perspective and helps with ths social distancing, but putting your faith in them is a fool's errand.
But you are cherry-picking US numbers. Look at France, Italy, Spain for example, they have had mandatory mask laws since the summer and their number have shot up since then.
Calling someone a troll or nut job is an insult and adds nothing to the debate.
Well for one the 2nd wave we're having right now in Ontario would have to be a lot smaller than what we're having right now (see my graph above).
You didnt answer jcpro's question.
Thankfully that didn't happen, as is evident to those who can read certain remarks with intelligent comprehension.
Evidently my comment above - in particular the part re intelligent comprehension - does not apply to you in this particular case.
I wonder how many people have been infected through their eyes who wouldn't have been infected anyway through their mouth or nose.
So now you're denying you referred to me as "a troll, person with sick agenda, or conspiracy nut job"??
Is my post not clear enough for you:
So if the results in one province were, say, 50% less, and the results everywhere else in the world were the same you would be a mask proponent? Spain, Belgium etc. would be irrelevant to you? I highly doubt that that would be the case. You would still be debating.
I'm saying the Ontario 2nd wave wouldnt be anywhere near as big as it is right now if masks made such a huge difference.
Perfectly clear insults? Where? Who did i insult? You? No one? Prove it. All i see from you is hot air & no evidence. Do you know what a false accuser is? Does that describe you in this present exchange?
