LOL....no bias on their site: https://www.cjpme.org/pwned
:bathbaby:
But I'm not surprised you have them bookmarked
LOL....no bias on their site: https://www.cjpme.org/pwned
:bathbaby:
I'm not surprised that you think any site with the word 'justice' and/or 'peace' must be biased.
So go ahead and do so because Hamas continues to do so. Oh that's right, you will never.Were Hamas proposing ethnic cleansing still, I'd be criticizing them as well....
Your fucking retarded wannabe boycott will go as far as your impeachment of Trump, or your ICC investigation into Israel, or your general election in 2020.I'm not surprised that you think any site with the word 'justice' and/or 'peace' must be biased.
After all, you support apartheid, don't you?
I'm sure you'll also support this finding from their poll.
You upset, sweetie?Your fucking retarded wannabe boycott will go as far as your impeachment of Trump, or your ICC investigation into Israel, or your general election in 2020.
In other words, you will lose IN ALL THREE!!!!
You got that????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
:wave:
You're the one who should be upset. Your side is getting your collective asses handed to you politically :nod:You upset, sweetie?
:bounce:
How so?You're the one who should be upset. Your side is getting your collective asses handed to you politically :nod:
Yet here you are demonizing Palestinians by making every post about Hamas and therefore all Palestinians, a blatant double standard.So franky on this is just like pronaddict on climate, unable to actually defend his viewpoint so he just starts spamming.
How do you think Canada views Hamas or how we view the 53% of Palestinians who support attacks on Israeli civilians inside Israel?
Of course criticisim of Israel isn't anti-semitic. Criticism of Israel existing, demonization of everything Israel does, and a blatant double standard of criticizing Israel while making excuses for Hamas is clearly anti-semitic.
https://electronicintifada.net/content/time-reality-check/26631Here is the problem for Israel: The more settlers it has, the more land it keeps. The more land it keeps, the more Palestinians it has to deal with.
With more than 620,000 settlers now in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, creating a viable, contiguous state for Palestinians has simply become physically impossible.
That leaves three options: Move Israeli civilians from occupied territory (and implement international law), force Palestinians out of the West Bank, including Jerusalem (and engage in another massive round of ethnic cleansing), or treat the two as inextricably conjoined.
Israel has had 25 years to prove that it is willing to abide by international law, end its civilian settlement project in, and relinquish control over, occupied territory, while allowing refugees their right to return. It has not seized the opportunity.
In that time, it is not only the number of settlements and settlers that have grown. There are now nearly as many, if not as many or more, Palestinians in the area of historic Palestine, from river to sea, as there are Israelis.
There has long been a debate about two states or one state that has morphed into one about three states or no states. But the reality is this: There is only one state on the ground. It has disputed borders and contains two peoples that largely adhere to three religions.
Israel has made it impossible for the two to physically separate. There is no suggestion from anyone – in Israel or elsewhere – how to change that. There is only wishful thinking and intransigence.
What is therefore left is to decide how this one state functions.
Smell the coffee
So far, this one state functions like an apartheid state. Palestinians live under a separate legal system to Israelis, and the latter are in uncontested and complete overall control.
There are nuances and variations within this picture: Palestinians with Israeli citizenship, Palestinians with Jerusalem IDs, Palestinians in Gaza or in Hebron, all of whom live in slightly different circumstances. Yet even if some of them enjoy greater freedoms than others, they are alike in that all enjoy fewer rights than the Jews who live around them.
Apartheid states can’t continue forever. Benny Morris – a historian who helped lay bare Israel’s guilt in creating the Palestinian refugee problem only to complain that that first round of ethnic cleansing in 1948 did not go far enough – understands that the idea of two states for two peoples has been buried with Israeli settlements.
This is the outcome he foresees.
“The occupation regime will continue to function. The Arabs will suffer and the Jews will also suffer (although a bit less),” Morris wrote recently. “At the end of the process, the one state will take shape.”
Staunch Israel supporters understand this. “How long can you live with the status quo?” asked Daniel Kurtzer, a former US ambassador to Israel. “We’re going to wake up one day and it’s going to be effectively one state.”
The only tweak is they – along with think tanks like the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies – see this as developing “at the end of the process,” or ”one day.” The INSS cautions against the “slide into the one-state scenario.”
In fact it is already one state. A badly run one, yes; one in which only one set of people have full rights, yes. But one state in the classical sense of control over borders and territory and the assertion of a monopoly on the legitimate use of force.
This is the case, whatever mirage Hamas and the PA think they are fighting over, whatever alternative reality Kurtzer thinks he is living in, whatever “process” Morris is seeing, or whatever “challenge” the think tankers have identified.
It is a reality Palestinians, first and foremost, need to confront now. They can start by not squabbling among themselves over a fantasy.
I love how you try and flip reality. Sorry but criticizing Hamas is not demonization, nor is pointing out that Palestinian polling has 53% of respondents supporting "attacks on Israeli civilians inside Israel" (their wording, not mine). You clearly have a different standard for Palestinians and Israeli Jews. The only thing worth questioning is whether you ignore bad acts from Palestinians and Arab sources because you think they're beneath criticism or if you hate the Jewish state so much you're happy to overlook Palestinian crimes.Yet here you are demonizing Palestinians by making every post about Hamas and therefore all Palestinians, a blatant double standard....
I comment that you switch every post to Hamas but it only took you 12 words to revert to proving me correct.I love how you try and flip reality. Sorry but criticizing Hamas
The way you try to make every thread about the middle east into an excuse to go after Israel? But WTF are you talking about? You post specifically about Hamas and then complain that I mention Hamas in my response?I comment that you switch every post to Hamas ...
Yes it is.I love how you try and flip reality. Sorry but criticizing Hamas is not demonization,
Holy fuck your arguments are pathetic. I guess you consider Canada, the EU, the US, and the Western world to be racist then because they all consider Hamas to be a terrorist entity.Yes it is.....
Shall we go back and check how many times you mention Hamas in replies on these threads?Holy fuck your arguments are pathetic. I guess you consider Canada, the EU, the US, and the Western world to be racist then because they all consider Hamas to be a terrorist entity.
And yes, YOUR criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic because you demonize the county's very existence and criticize them while excusing every nasty action by their enemies. I criticize Israel's politics where merited. You criticize Israel existing while constantly making excuses for Hamas, the PA, Iran, and anyone else who shares your hatred.
Other than because Hamas is a terrorist entity that chooses to launch war crime rockets, guns down random civilians at bus stops, and is absolutely opposed to any permanent peace that involves Jews being in the region?Shall we go back and check how many times you mention Hamas in replies on these threads?....
Netanyahu is aligned with a terrorist group and has chosen to launch way more rockets at Gaza, as well as shooting civilian protesters, children and women by snipers hiding behind a wall.Other than because Hamas is a terrorist entity that chooses to launch war crime rockets, guns down random civilians at bus stops, and is absolutely opposed to any permanent peace that involves Jews being in the region?.
You keep making things up. Netanyahu encouraged two other groups to merge. Even though the group in question are openly racist, I haven't seen any evidence of their being engaged in terrorism.Netanyahu is aligned with a terrorist group
The Kahanists are linked to the JDL, who were the largest terrorist group in the US in the 70's and 80's.You keep making things up. Netanyahu encouraged two other groups to merge. Even though the group in question are openly racist, I haven't seen any evidence of their being engaged in terrorism.
.