DIAGNOSIS HATE: Cleveland doc vowed to give Jews 'wrong meds'

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
I guess this is as close as you come to admitting Hamas are terrorists.

Hamas recently attacked three bus stops full of civilians but of course you want to ignore that.
Ignore?

No, it just gets drowned out by the weekly gunning down of women and children by Israeli snipers.
Every Friday, just a sport now.

I guess you just choose to ignore gunning down people you don't think fully human or deserving of full human rights.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Ignore?....
Yes, you have completely ignored it. Not once have you condemned Hamas for sending their fighters to gun down random civilians at bus stops simply because Hamas think Jews have no right to be in the region. You main comment was to hint it was the victims fault because they were Jews in the West Bank. Sadly you and Hamas seem to have a lot in common.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Yes, you have completely ignored it. Not once have you condemned Hamas for sending their fighters to gun down random civilians at bus stops simply because Hamas think Jews have no right to be in the region. You main comment was to hint it was the victims fault because they were Jews in the West Bank. Sadly you and Hamas seem to have a lot in common.
Bullshit, I condemned it months ago.

Contrast that with you, who refuses to condemn Israel gunning down women and children on a weekly basis.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/02/1033742

You are the terrorist sympathizer here.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Bullshit, I condemned it months ago.....
Show me the post where you condemned Hamas for gunning down random civilians simply because they were Jews. You spend a lot of time claiming you criticized Hamas but no time actually doing so.

Do you agree with Hamas that Jewish civilians in the West Bank are valid targets?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Show me the post where you condemned Hamas for gunning down random civilians simply because they were Jews. You spend a lot of time claiming you criticized Hamas but no time actually doing so.

Do you agree with Hamas that Jewish civilians in the West Bank are valid targets?
Civilians are not valid targets.

Do you agree with Israel that civilian protesters in Gaza are valid targets for snipers?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Civilians are not valid targets....?
So where do you criticize Hamas targeting them, bragging about it, and celebrating their deaths?

But you also sidestepped the question; do you think Jewish civilians in the West Bank are valid targets?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
So where do you criticize Hamas targeting them, bragging about it, and celebrating their deaths?

But you also sidestepped the question; do you think Jewish civilians in the West Bank are valid targets?
You are sidestepping the issue.
Why do you think Palestinian civilians are a legitimate target in Gaza for snipers, every fucking week for a year?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
You are sidestepping the issue....
Why won't you share your opinion on the status of Jewish civilians in the West Bank? (Actually, on several occasions you have shared your opinion repeatedly; you like Hamas think Jews deserve to be targeted if they are in what Palestinians consider to be their land)

Why won't you criticize Hamas for targeting random Jews at bus stops?


Israel is fully within their rights to shoot violent people who are attacking Israeli troops or trying to infiltrate the border. It would be better if Israel was able to enter Gaza to arrest them (but you would then complain about Israel entering Gaza and daring to arrest Palestinians). It would even be better if Hamas as the de-facto government stepped in to stop violence but they are heavily involved in the violence and their fighters make up a significant number of the dead. Non-violent protesters is a different story (there are accusations from groups with a heavy bias against Israel but none of them have even interviewed Israeli troops or commanders involved so there is no evidence).


p.s. Two rockets from Gaza were launched at Tel Aviv today. Any comment?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Israel is fully within their rights to shoot violent people who are attacking Israeli troops or trying to infiltrate the border.
“There can be no justification for killing and injuring journalists, medics, and persons who pose no imminent threat of death or serious injury to those around them. Particularly alarming is the targeting of children and persons with disabilities,” said Sara Hossain. “Many young persons’ lives have been altered forever. 122 people have had a limb amputated since 30 March last year. Twenty of these amputees are children.”
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=24226&LangID=E

Sorry, dude, but shooting children, women, disabled, medics and journalists is never justified.
Nor is shooting protesters you disagree with even if you label them as 'violen't when your snipers are behind a giant, prison wall and totally not in danger.

Your support of the weekly shooting of children is disgusting.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Why won't you share your opinion on the status of Jewish civilians in the West Bank? (Actually, on several occasions you have shared your opinion repeatedly; you like Hamas think Jews deserve to be targeted if they are in what Palestinians consider to be their land)

Why won't you criticize Hamas for targeting random Jews at bus stops?...
Still waiting. I answered your question. I know you are upset I won't support the agenda of Hamas but that's no reason to avoid simple courtesy and answer mine.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Still waiting. I answered your question. I know you are upset I won't support the agenda of Hamas but that's no reason to avoid simple courtesy and answer mine.
You are supporting an agenda that is presently worse than Hamas.


“There can be no justification for killing and injuring journalists, medics, and persons who pose no imminent threat of death or serious injury to those around them. Particularly alarming is the targeting of children and persons with disabilities,” said Sara Hossain. “Many young persons’ lives have been altered forever. 122 people have had a limb amputated since 30 March last year. Twenty of these amputees are children.”
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=24226&LangID=E

Sorry, dude, but shooting children, women, disabled, medics and journalists is never justified.
Nor is shooting protesters you disagree with even if you label them as 'violen't when your snipers are behind a giant, prison wall and totally not in danger.

Your support of the weekly shooting of children is disgusting.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
You are supporting an agenda that is presently worse than Hamas.....
I know you think Israel existing and Jews having rights to be evil but the Western world doesn't. In fact they see Hamas as evil and a terrorist entity.

Why won't you share your opinion on the whether Jewish civilians in the West Bank are valid targets and why won't you condemn Hamas for gunning them down?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
I know you think Israel existing and Jews having rights to be evil but the Western world doesn't.
WTF?

Why do you think Jews have 'a right to be evil'?

Both sides need to be held to the law.
Give both sides basic human rights and treat both sides the same before the law.

Nobody has a 'right to be evil'.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
That's what I think every time you promote Israel as evil yet make excuses for terrorist groups.

p.s. Hamas doesn't want equal rights with Jews and Palestinians overwhelmingly reject the idea but you never even hint at condemnation for them.



p.s. Way to twist words. You think it evil that Jews have rights in the region. It is the only reason you could continually be supporting the racist agenda of Hamas while continually attacking Israel.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
p.s. Hamas doesn't want equal rights with Jews and Palestinians overwhelmingly reject the idea but you never even hint at condemnation for them.
Netanyahu just stated this:
“We will rule over all the territory west of the Jordan, we will be everywhere,” Netanyahu said. “We won’t uproot even one person. No one will be uprooted.”

The Israeli premier made the comments Monday in a closed-door meeting of Likud legislators at a Jerusalem heritage centre named after Menachem Begin, the first Likud leader to rule the country.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/...rael-will-keep-all-land-between-river-and-sea

When he's talking about 'not even one person', do you think he's including Palestinians or is he acknowledging that he doesn't even count them as people?
That is just as bad as what you complain about Hamas, yet you never would suggest its the same problem, would you?

Your complaints are based entirely on race.

Just treat both sides equally.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
p.s. Way to twist words. You think it evil that Jews have rights in the region.
Yes, you are twisting words.
I have never stated that, instead argued only that all people living in Israel should have equal rights.
Its only you that argues that only Jewish people deserve basic human rights.
I argue for equality.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,090
2,633
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Netanyahu just stated this:

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/...rael-will-keep-all-land-between-river-and-sea

When he's talking about 'not even one person', do you think he's including Palestinians or is he acknowledging that he doesn't even count them as people?
That is just as bad as what you complain about Hamas, yet you never would suggest its the same problem, would you?

Your complaints are based entirely on race.

Just treat both sides equally.


Middle East Eye (MEE) is a London-based online news outlet covering events in the Middle East. According to its official website, MEE is an "independently funded online news organization that was founded in April 2014". It aims to be the primary portal of Middle East news, and describes its target audience as "all those communities of readers living in and around the region that care deeply for its fate".[1]

MEE is suspected of pro-Muslim Brotherhood bias by a number of governments, observers and scholars. Saudi Arabia and a number of its allies demanded that Qatar shut down MEE, which they consider to be a Qatari-funded and aligned outlet.

another one of frankfooter's source. a muslim brotherhood biased website.

frankfooter you are predictable. rockefeller funded sources, a site set up by a convicted terrorist who had travel restrictions imposed on him, another site the attack people due to thier jewishness, another one that is linked to hamas and the muslim brothood and now a nother site that is accused of supporting the muslim brotherhood etc


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Eye

Criticism and controversy
Links to Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood and Qatar
According to the Michael Rubin, a scholar part of the American Enterprise Institute, MEE and its chief editor David Hearst were noted to have exclusive access to Hamas news content in their articles.[4][5][6] David Hearst was also noted by Rubin to have penned editorials praising and defending the Muslims brotherhood.[4][7][8] According to Rubin, The Middle East Eye website was registered by Adlin Adnan, an official of Interpal, which is a United Kingdom-based charity designated by the US Treasury Department as a financial supporter of Hamas.[4]

According to the Hudson Institute, MEE and Middle East Monitor were launched by Muslim Brotherhood affiliates as an alternative to the Qatari based Al Jazeera to provide western readers the Muslim Brotherhood point of view.[9]

Saudi Arabia accuses MEE of being a news outlet funded by Qatar (both directly and indirectly).[10] The Emirati newspaper The National, claimed Middle East Eye coverage to have an anti-Emirati bias and noted several members employed by MEE to be originally part of Al Jazeera.[11][12] The National also accused MEE of being associated with multiple members of the Muslim Brotherhood.[11]

On 22 June 2017, during the 2017–18 Qatar diplomatic crisis, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, and Bahrain, as part of a list of 13 demands, demanded that Qatar close Middle East Eye, which they saw as sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood and a Qatari-funded and aligned outlet. Middle East Eye denied it has ever received Qatari funds.[13][14]
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,090
2,633
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Shout out to the United Arab Emirates for showing the world the middle east eye is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. and the U.A.E does not have diplomatic relations with Israel


https://www.thenational.ae/uae/new-london-connection-to-islamists-1.648408

A senior executive with Qatar’s TV network Al Jazeera was closely involved with setting up the London news website Middle East Eye, some of whose staff have links to organisations sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.

A senior executive with Qatar’s TV network Al Jazeera was closely involved with setting up the London news website Middle East Eye, some of whose staff have links to organisations sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Jonathan Powell, an Al Jazeera employee since 2009, spent several months in the UK working on Middle East Eye, which promised “independently produced news, analysis and opinion” at its launch in April. MEE claims to have “no political master, movement or country”.

David Hearst, editor of Middle East Eye and a former foreign correspondent for The Guardian, last week refused to give details about the site’s funding, saying only that his backers were “individual private donors” who were “interested in democracy in the Middle East”.

He also refused to provide any information about the nationalities of those behind Middle East Eye but confirmed he was headhunted for the post of editor.

The questions were put to him as part of an investigation by The National that revealed connections between the Muslim Brotherhood and media coverage in the UK critical of the UAE.

Mr Powell is understood to have spent up to six months in London between September last year and February 13 as a launch consultant for Middle East Eye.

The news organisation was created as a company in early December last year, registered to an address in North London.

Its website was registered by Adlin Adnan, a Middle East Eye employee, to a different address in Central London at the end of that month.

Mr Powell has since returned to Doha, assigned to special projects for Al Jazeera’s chairman’s office.

The chairman of Al Jazeera is Hamad bin Thamer Al Thani, a cousin of the previous emir of Qatar, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani.

Mr Powell also registered separate websites for themiddleeasteye.com and themiddleeasteye.net in January this year. Both were registered to a Doha address but are not active.

Al Jazeera did not respond to several requests for comment about the extent of its involvement in Middle East Eye.

The Qatari broadcaster’s connection to Middle East Eye also includes Jamal Bassasso, a former director of planning and human resources at Al Jazeera.

Mr Bassasso, a Palestinian born in Kuwait and now living in London, is sole director of MEE Ltd, the company that owns Middle East Eye.

He is also a former director for Samalink TV in Lebanon, the registered agent for the website of the Hamas-controlled Al Quds TV.

Mr Hearst has denied that Mr Bassasso is the real owner of Middle East Eye, describing him only as “a colleague and the head of human resources and the legal director”.

Mr Bassasso had also worked for a Dubai property company with Anas Mekdad, another Palestinian with connections to Al Islah, the UAE wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, several of whose members are serving prison sentences for trying to overthrow the Government.

Now living in the UK, Mr Mekdad is the founder of the Islamist web forum AlMakeem Network, which has praised Hamas suicide bombers, and continues to use his Twitter stream in support of convicted UAE members of Al Islah.

Mr Bassasso has also contributed to AlMakeem Network.

A day after the publication of The National’s investigation, Mr Hearst posted an interview from the offices of Middle East Eye on YouTube, repeating that the company was not linked to any government or movement. Saying his staff came from varied backgrounds and that “some are activists”, he added: “The moment they come through this door they become journalists.”

The company employs about 20 full-time staff in its London offices and has a network of freelancers.

Mr Hearst said it was created with “start-up money” but that “the business plan was to become a provider of news”.

Among those employed by Middle East Eye is Rori Donaghy, former director of the Emirates Centre For Human Rights, based in London, which has attacked the UAE’s human rights record on the BBC and other leading news organisations.

It also offered to pay demonstrators to protest outside the UAE Embassy in London. The ECHR was set up with the assistance of Anas Altikriti, the founder of the Cordoba Foundation.

Cordoba this month placed an advertisement in a London newspaper claiming that the UAE was trying to pressure the UK government into banning Muslim Brotherhood activities there.

Mr Altikriti employed Mr Donaghy as the director of ECHR. After his departure to Middle East Eye, he was replaced by Mr Mekdad of the AlMakeem Network. Last week the website for ECHR was taken down, apparently by Mr Donaghy.

* After the publication of this story, Al Jazeera contacted The National with the following statements:

Jonathan Powell said: “I left Al Jazeera last year to pursue a new opportunity but later returned after being offered a new role. I have a lot of experience in launching media organisations and was brought on as a consultant by Middle East Eye. This was entirely separate to my work with Al Jazeera.”

An Al Jazeera spokesperson said: “Al Jazeera has no relationship with the Middle East Eye.”
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,835
113
Yes, you are twisting words....
Do you even read what you post or are you simply trying to imitate a bot? And your continual lies are even more pathetic than Trump. I take it as a compliment though since you make up accusations mostly when you have had your arguments completely wrecked and you are exposed as a pile of racist hatred. You just argued in another thread that instead of criticizing Hamas for using terror weapons they should be given better weapons so your views are pretty clear.

If you wanted equality you would have a word or two of condemnation for Hamas because they outright reject the idea as do an overwhelming majority of Palestinians.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,846
22,908
113
Middle East Eye (MEE) is a London-based online news outlet covering events in the Middle East.
Are you claiming that the quote from Netanyahu is false?
If you have evidence the quote is false, bring it.
Otherwise your 'attacking the messenger' is just that, more crud from dodgy sources you use, like RT.

Prove the quote is false or admit that your attack is itself the bullshit here.
 
Toronto Escorts