Wait a second?A large number of children are shot by parents every year in USA, when they try to sneak into the house after the curfew time.
Aren't responsible gun owners trained to calmly and rationally assess a situation like that?
Wait a second?A large number of children are shot by parents every year in USA, when they try to sneak into the house after the curfew time.
Your scenario is unlikely because by the time once I've drawn my weapon, I would point it at the intruder and tell him to get out or I'll shoot.Please play out the scenario for us.
Something like this?...
*smash*
<Nasty wakes up, turns over in bed, reaches to gun safe, unlocks with fingerprint scan, locked and loaded... armed in less than 5 seconds>
*Mission Impossible music as Nasty stealthily walks upstairs from his basement bedroom*
*Nasty gets eyes on menacing intruder in hallway*
Nasty: "Whoa there illegal intruder. I have you in my sights you dastardly individual. Speak now... Do you intend on stealing my TV and car keys, or is your nefarious intention to rape grammies and murder the both of us? For if it is the former, I have no intention or legal right to dispatch my loaded and cocked firearm at the centre mass of your person, however, you scoundrel, if it is the latter, prepare to die!"
You can take it from here and let us know how you'd handle it
Hold on a second...Your scenario is unlikely because by the time once I've drawn my weapon, I would point it at the intruder and tell him to get out or I'll shoot.
Unless the burglar is drunk, high on drugs or a complete moron, its more likely he'll get scared and hightail it out of there
First, that would seem to be the likely profile of a burglar.Your scenario is unlikely because by the time once I've drawn my weapon, I would point it at the intruder and tell him to get out or I'll shoot.
Unless the burglar is drunk, high on drugs or a complete moron, its more likely he'll get scared and hightail it out of there
Any rational person would call 911. You can hold a gun and make a telephone call at the same time. You know that, right?? Its called multi-taskingWhat if he refuses to leave after your warning, but does nothing to try to harm you?
You no doubt have one of these:Any rational person would call 911. You can hold a gun and make a telephone call at the same time. You know that, right?? Its called multi-tasking
LOL....thats awesome. I want one now :biggrin1:You no doubt have one of these:
You can certainly point a firearm at someone who's invaded your house; it is legal to resist that. That's because you don't know what that person's going to do to you. He may want to kill you, being the criminal that he is. You have your gun drawn for self defense. You are not allowed to shoot that person until you are sure that your life is in danger: that is, if that person advances towards you despite him being warned, or pulls out a weapon and doesn't turn back. You don't have to match the other person's weapon. Even with no weapon, a person can kill you. Once that person retreats, he is not being a threat and you can't shoot.First, that would seem to be the likely profile of a burglar.
Secondly, hasn't anybody taught you not to point a weapon at somebody if you do not intend to shoot him??
This is why in Ontario (actually in Canada and many US States) if you are concerned about home defence, you would want to think twice before reaching for a gun. If a homeowner is worried, first line would be exterior lighting (eg: motion activated). Next would be secure entry points (good locks on doors and windows). Third would be an alarm system combined with a panic button or even something as simple as smart lights with an “All On” button programmed into your phone. Most burglars would be deterred by this. If you’re still worried and you don’t think you could perform under a high stress situation, then get a non-lethal weapon. Too many gun owners believe they could safely handle their weapons in a real life, high stress situation. Given the number who can’t safely handle their weapons at a range, or in the field - this is a dangerous belief.If you shoot in self defense, you are going to be arrested in Ontario, regardless of your explanations to the police. You will also have to spend in excess of $20,000 to defend yourself. But Canadian courts have usually acquitted people who had been charged during self defense. IF you show that you feared for your life, or the life of your loved ones., than you are justified using lethal force. What do you think the police do anyway? they will pull out their gun when threatened.
Yep.This is why in Ontario (actually in Canada and many US States) if you are concerned about home defence, you would want to think twice before reaching for a gun. If a homeowner is worried, first line would be exterior lighting (eg: motion activated). Next would be secure entry points (good locks on doors and windows). Third would be an alarm system combined with a panic button or even something as simple as smart lights with an “All On” button programmed into your phone. Most burglars would be deterred by this. If you’re still worried and you don’t think you could perform under a high stress situation, then get a non-lethal weapon. Too many gun owners believe they could safely handle their weapons in a real life, high stress situation. Given the number who can’t safely handle their weapons at a range, or in the field - this is a dangerous belief.
Yep.
I live in a condo now, so I'm not concerned, but when I had a house, and living alone, I had an alarm system with panic button beside my bed. And a steel baton under my bed if needed.
Gee, thanks for the revelation.so if you beat the shit out of an intruder with a baton and killed that person, would it be the same with a gun and get your ass charged either way, one being more work
that's a BB phone within a BB gun - Obsolete!You no doubt have one of these:
noobGee, thanks for the revelation.
I didn't realize that killing is killing, nor that beating someone with a baton is more work than pulling a trigger.
Panic buttons are great. The problem is that police will probably not show up in time. This is especially true in rural areas.This is why in Ontario (actually in Canada and many US States) if you are concerned about home defence, you would want to think twice before reaching for a gun. If a homeowner is worried, first line would be exterior lighting (eg: motion activated). Next would be secure entry points (good locks on doors and windows). Third would be an alarm system combined with a panic button or even something as simple as smart lights with an “All On” button programmed into your phone. Most burglars would be deterred by this. If you’re still worried and you don’t think you could perform under a high stress situation, then get a non-lethal weapon. Too many gun owners believe they could safely handle their weapons in a real life, high stress situation. Given the number who can’t safely handle their weapons at a range, or in the field - this is a dangerous belief.
that's a BB phone within a BB gun - Obsolete!
say hello to my friend
Anti-gun organisations are very few, but very vocal, get a lot of press time by a sympathetic media that in turn publishes nonsense and hysteria to the public, and have a lot of influence with uninformed politicians.Haven't seen too many people here saying Canada should ban more guns. Most of us are pretty content with the balance our laws strike.
I imagine that you are part of a militia to protect your rights.They just want to ban the most dangerous guns...... until they're all gone, since all guns are potentially lethal. They always come for more.
Is that the alarm system thats hooked up to your mom's intercom upstairs??I had an alarm system with panic button beside my bed