CupidsEscorts Tweets a Client's Information

[thumper18474]

Well so much for the "discretion and privacy is paramount in this industry"..mantra
The guy did a douchebag move and should be blacklisted
The owner of the agency(.who appears to be a serial outer according to this thread )should be black listed along with her agency...
Those who frequented this agency and still do... should all take a good look at what happened here and if you dont care that your personal info is NOT PRIVATE..then by all means continue but Ill hazard a guess that there are more who do than who dont....

 

[frankcastle]

A confession by an escort agency claiming it was a confession, now counts as a confession from the person himself??

Okay so how do you provide proof?

 

[frankcastle]

Well so much for the "discretion and privacy is paramount in this industry"..mantra
The guy did a douchebag move and should be blacklisted
The owner of the agency(.who appears to be a serial outer according to this thread )should be black listed along with her agency...
Those who frequented this agency and still do... should all take a good look at what happened here and if you dont care that your personal info is NOT PRIVATE..then by all means continue but Ill hazard a guess that there are more who do than who dont....

This type of reaction is over the top.

She has been running cupids for over 15 years.

In my past dealing with her she was professional.

In 15 years theres been how many outings?

If youve been using cupids and act accordingly you should not feel any concern.

 

[frankcastle]

To be fair maybe she didnt know thst his cell number was linked to his personal info.

So her intent was just to provide the number for other girls to be on thd look out.

Her response could also be attributed to a person realized she made a mistake.

So if we are going to give the steslther the benefit of doubt then jillian deserves the same. In other words lets not assume she outed an innocent person out of some sort of vendetta.

Also maybe she was furious at the stealther and lost her cool. We are human.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Okay so how do you provide proof?

The onus of proof is upon the accuser, not the other way around.

Otherwise anyone could just accuse everyone else without proof, and get convictions everywhere. DUH!!!

 

[peepingtom]

Okay so how do you provide proof?

proof beyond a reasonable doubt to prove the guilty.

This type of reaction is over the top.

She has been running cupids for over 15 years.

In my past dealing with her she was professional.

In 15 years theres been how many outings?

If youve been using cupids and act accordingly you should not feel any concern.

Should we start a new thread for that bolded question? lol

 

[Smallcock]

I look at it this way.... it means that at least one SP at cupids has limits on what she will do to avoid disease..... AND it means that the management stands behind their girls.

I completely appreciate both of those types of attitudes in a company that I would support. Yes I have used them in the past but that was a long time ago as I am 90% MP these days.

Honestly, if you conduct yourself properly you have nothing to worry about.

Boycotting the agency just means you are supporting a guy who likes stealthing.

I find it hilarious that these types of events brings out the haters.

I find it troubling that you're a teacher yet time and time again you fail at logic. This is in part why today's students are so brain dead.

 

[Smallcock]

This is not the first time she has done this she has outed another client as well as outing one of her own SP's to her SO, she got away with it the other times and she thinks this sort of outing should be acceptable. That demonstrates how much of a vindictive loose cannon she truly is. Will be avoiding this agency.

What was her reasoning for outing her own SP to her SO?

 

[Smallcock]

Okay so how do you provide proof?

A visit to the cop shop and a doctor's vaginal swab would help to substantiate the claim.

 

[freedom3]

It's guys like that who drive women out of the industry. Cupids did the right thing. Plus, he outright confessed. I would believe her even if he didn't confess, but in this case there is no issue as to what he did because he confessed.

 

[eternalbachelor]

Are you saying Harvey Weinstein shouldn’t have been named because he wasn’t convicted of raping Hollywood actresses?

Harvey Weinstein has been named by actual complainants, not by the agency. If Cupids' SP herself leaked it, it would be different.

 

[frankcastle]

A visit to the cop shop and a doctor's vaginal swab would help to substantiate the claim.

Only problem is most SPs don't want to do that.

 

[frankcastle]

Harvey Weinstein has been named by actual complainants, not by the agency. If Cupids' SP herself leaked it, it would be different.

In the HW thread and other similar threads there are people who will question the victim. Think the same would have happened if the SP leaked it.

 

[frankcastle]

I find it troubling that you're a teacher yet time and time again you fail at logic. This is in part why today's students are so brain dead.

I'm not a teacher. My years of prowling Flirt when it was one of the few really late night spas is my best alibi.

Not sure why you need to make personal attacks and insults. Both you and Phil have chosen to respond to my posts rudely.
Which is fine. I'll take the high road.

Guess the irony is lost on you. Here you are giving out unfounded information about me in a thread about Jillian giving out personal information of a person who will never see their day in court.

 

[frankcastle]

The onus of proof is upon the accuser, not the other way around.

Otherwise anyone could just accuse everyone else without proof, and get convictions everywhere. DUH!!!

Right but the problem is you and I know this will never go to court.

I'm well aware of rape kits etc.

 

[apoptygma]

Only problem is most SPs don't want to do that.

That's not OUR problem.

 

[frankcastle]

That's not OUR problem.

never said it was your problem.

I was just mentioning that in the context of a few guys demanding concrete proof.

People will not be satisfied. IF she did a rape kit there would be guys saying all it proves was that he did BBFS and not rape.

 

[frankcastle]

Anyways, not trying to get people to reverse their boycott position. I'm just pointing out that they are boycotting over something that is very unlikely to happen to them.

 

[apoptygma]

IF she did a rape kit there would be guys saying all it proves was that he did BBFS and not rape.

IF she did a rape kit, there would be potential evidence, which could then possibly be used in a criminal case against him, along with other possible evidence (known bad client, etc...) to get him behind bars.

As it stands, all we have after this vigilante justice attempt is an environment where legit guys are going to be MUCH more antsy when it comes to giving ANY personal information to ANY agency... and it has also let the scum bags know that police will not be involved, so let the burner phones and fake IDs do their jobs.

 

[apoptygma]

Anyways, not trying to get people to reverse their boycott position. I'm just pointing out that they are boycotting over something that is very unlikely to happen to them.

Given that the owner of this agency has proven herself to be a loose cannon, I can legitimately and seriously doubt that.