Stop trying to turn the subject away from your claims about Iran.Yet Franky coming here to bitch about Israel is okay?
And where did you get this info that a couple of hundred centrifuges will supply 20 reactors? I only ask because it is complete nonsense.My claim is that Iran has absolutely no peaceful purpose for the 25,000 centrifuges they have working or in storage. A couple hundred centrifuges will sustain them even with 20 reactors.
And yes, I did misread. That doesn't change the farcical way you defend Iran's enrichment capacity.
Another question, where do you suppose Iran would buy a CANDU reactor when Canada will not sell them one?Not at all. Iran claims that they need 25,000 centrifuges to power enrich fuel for their commercial reactor. That's just nonsense. A couple hundred centrifuges would be more than enough to maintain a stockpile of 3.76% enriched fuel. Even better they can use a CANDU style reactor that works with natural or slightly enriched uranium (under 1%).
There is only one practical purpose for that many centrifuges.
Yesterday you were all "OMG they have enough uranium for 300 years! They must be building a bomb!!!!"My claim is that Iran has absolutely no peaceful purpose for the 25,000 centrifuges they have working or in storage. A couple hundred centrifuges will sustain them even with 20 reactors.
And yes, I did misread. That doesn't change the farcical way you defend Iran's enrichment capacity.
The only conceivable use of Iran's 25,000 reactors is to maintain a very short breakout time.
Annual matter consumption of a typical nuclear reactor is about 1.051 kg.
http://www.nuclear-power.net/nuclea...uel/fuel-consumption-of-conventional-reactor/
That means the fuel they have is sufficient for 193 years of operation for one reactor or 48.2 years for 4 reactors. Happy?
Quite the record you have there for honesty and accuracy.That's 277 years worth of fuel.
.
Interesting. You are now saying that they can't enrich to 3.67% but they can enrich to 90%? That's an interesting "fact".Well the irony of the nuclear enrichment cycle is they do not have enough centrifuges to produce enough nuclear fuel for their commercial purposes, however, they do have enough to possibly make some HE Uranium to build a bomb, but the limit on stockpile is how they have decided to control this. Making HE uranium will definitely take some time and their ability to make plutonium has been dismantled.
They cannot legally enrich to 90%, but they have the knowledge to do so...I know this because they have already done it in the past. They shipped all their HE uranium to Russia under IAEA oversight. Once you have mastered enrichment you can get to HE by just repeating the cycle...Interesting. You are now saying that they can't enrich to 3.67% but they can enrich to 90%? That's an interesting "fact".
And it is obvious that you haven't even looked at a basic primer on nuclear enrichment.
You do realize that 3.67% is on the way from natural 0.7% to 90% right?They cannot legally enrich to 90%, but they have the knowledge to do so...I know this because they have already done it in the past. They shipped all their HE uranium to Russia under IAEA oversight. Once you have mastered enrichment you can get to HE by just repeating the cycle...
Well, back from having lied about the amount of uranium Iran is keeping, now you have a new claim.You do realize that 3.67% is on the way from natural 0.7% to 90% right?
But thanks for proving my point that Iran can easily produce weapon grade uranium any time they want to stop cooperating.
I admit my mistakes. When you get caught making mistakes, you just continue with the lies.Well, back from having lied about the amount of uranium Iran is keeping,
Do you deny that you have to pass 3% enriched before getting to 90% enriched?now you have a new claim.
And of they didn't have a huge centrifuge capacity (allegedly for their one reactor) or if they simply bought reactor grade uranium like many countries they wouldn't be able to make a bomb.If Iran stops agreeing to the NPT they could make a bomb!
Well, duh.
This is page 3 of this thread, you kept repeating your 'mistakes' over and over until you were totally exposed.I admit my mistakes. When you get caught making mistakes, you just continue with the lies.
That is not a point, it is common knowledge. Everyone knows that. But it will take some time to get there.You do realize that 3.67% is on the way from natural 0.7% to 90% right?
But thanks for proving my point that Iran can easily produce weapon grade uranium any time they want to stop cooperating.
Why should they buy it? If its so important to the USA why don't they offer to GIVE it?I admit my mistakes. When you get caught making mistakes, you just continue with the lies.
Do you deny that you have to pass 3% enriched before getting to 90% enriched?
And of they didn't have a huge centrifuge capacity (allegedly for their one reactor) or if they simply bought reactor grade uranium like many countries they wouldn't be able to make a bomb.
It has already been made QUITE CLEAR to you that their centrifuge capacity is NOT huge for the one reactor, in fact it cannot even supply the one reactor. So why do you persist in this nonsensical train of thought? They are in fact buying fuel from Russia, but the centrifuges are a guarantee and part of their right to master the nuclear fuel cycle.I admit my mistakes. When you get caught making mistakes, you just continue with the lies.
Do you deny that you have to pass 3% enriched before getting to 90% enriched?
And of they didn't have a huge centrifuge capacity (allegedly for their one reactor) or if they simply bought reactor grade uranium like many countries they wouldn't be able to make a bomb.
Then why did the international community demand a massive reduction in centrifuges? I guess you know better than the IAEA though.It has already been made QUITE CLEAR to you that their centrifuge capacity is NOT huge for the one reactor, ...
The same reason they limited them to a 300kg stockpile of sub 4% and forced them to give up all their HE Uranium, and plutonium capacity. i.e to ensure that getting HE uranium will take at least 6 months.Then why did the international community demand a massive reduction in centrifuges? I guess you know better than the IAEA though.
Thank you for admitting that the world sees Iran's nuclear program as a thinly veiled attempt at nuclear weapons.The same reason they limited them to a 300kg stockpile of sub 4% and forced them to give up all their HE Uranium, and plutonium capacity. i.e to ensure that getting HE uranium will take at least 6 months.
Considering your obsession with nukes, why don't you care about Saudi Arabia's attempts to buy nukes?Thank you for admitting that the world sees Iran's nuclear program as a thinly veiled attempt at nuclear weapons.
Thank you for admitting that the world sees Iran's nuclear program as a thinly veiled attempt at nuclear weapons.
