Saudi Arabia financed a dry run of 9/11 in 1999
- Thread starter Frankfooter
- Start date
If they quadrupled the number of reactors they still would have enough fuel for 40 years, even if they had the power plants right now. No need for centrifuges for a long time. Even if they eventually get up to the 20 reactors they claim to want, they would only need a few cascades to maintain their supply of commercial grade Uranium.Because they are building more power plants.
Yet that's exactly what your said. Make up your mind.Yes, right wingers have been behind most of the US interventions, but that doesn't mean that the US caused 90% of terrorism.....
I'm not sure this is true, and since you aren't trustworthy, please provide legit support for this claim that they have 150 years of reactor grade uranium refined and on stock.If they quadrupled the number of reactors they still would have enough fuel for 40 years, even if they had the power plants right now. No need for centrifuges for a long time. Even if they eventually get up to the 20 reactors they claim to want, they would only need a few cascades to maintain their supply of commercial grade Uranium.
No, try reading again.Yet that's exactly what your said. Make up your mind.
And I'll also repeat this:
If you really think those interventions and invasions are great, please list which countries you think are success stories because of US intervention.
Amusing coming from a guy who has been caught lying three times in the past few days. But since you asked:I'm not sure this is true, and since you aren't trustworthy, please provide legit support for this claim that they have 150 years of reactor grade uranium refined and on stock.
From the most recent IAEA report
14. Throughout the reporting period, Iran’s total enriched uranium stockpile has not exceeded
300 kg of UF6 enriched up to 3.67% U-235 (or the equivalent in different chemical forms) (para. 56).
The quantity of 300 kg of UF6 corresponds to 202.8 kg of uranium.1
https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/gov2017-35.pdf
Annual matter consumption of a typical nuclear reactor is about 1.051 kg.
http://www.nuclear-power.net/nuclea...uel/fuel-consumption-of-conventional-reactor/
That means the fuel they have is sufficient for 193 years of operation for one reactor or 48.2 years for 4 reactors. Happy?
As I said, they have absolutely no justification for their massive number of centrifuges.
You posted it. Why don't you try reading?No, try reading again.
And I'll also repeat this:
If you really think those interventions and invasions are great, please list which countries you think are success stories because of US intervention.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...hippers-were-killed-in-terrorist-attack/page4Right wingers.
Right wingers have started most of the middle east US 'interventions' that have caused 90% of terrorism.
Thanks, I suspected you were full of crap on this point and supporting the documents proves it.Amusing coming from a guy who has been caught lying three times in the past few days. But since you asked:
From the most recent IAEA report
14. Throughout the reporting period, Iran’s total enriched uranium stockpile has not exceeded
300 kg of UF6 enriched up to 3.67% U-235 (or the equivalent in different chemical forms) (para. 56).
The quantity of 300 kg of UF6 corresponds to 202.8 kg of uranium.1
https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/gov2017-35.pdf
Annual matter consumption of a typical nuclear reactor is about 1.051 kg.
http://www.nuclear-power.net/nuclea...uel/fuel-consumption-of-conventional-reactor/
That means the fuel they have is sufficient for 193 years of operation for one reactor or 48.2 years for 4 reactors. Happy?
As I said, they have absolutely no justification for their massive number of centrifuges.
300 kg is the maximum they are allowed to enrich per the NPT.
The next line of the report states the amount of that limit that they have actually refined and have in storage.
That would put them at 24 years of fuel for four reactors, which is not unreasonable.15. As of 21 August 2017, the quantity of Iran’s uranium enriched up to 3.67% U-235 was
88.4 kg,18 based on the JCPOA and decisions of the Joint Commission.
You lied.
I love the fact that you keep defending US interventions, including the US dropping 26,000 bombs on 7 Muslim countries in 2016, yet can't come up with a single story of success.You posted it. Why don't you try reading?
You keep claiming you are against terrorism yet fully defend one of its major causes.
You are hopeless. Even when you are completely exposed you continue to pretend you're right. But including point 15, they have 202.8 kg of Uranium is gas form as well as 88.4 kg in solid form. That's 277 years worth of fuel. And if you cared about honesty, you would notice that I'd be okay with Iran keeping a couple of cascades, just not the 25,000 centrifuges they have working or in storage.Thanks, I suspected you were full of crap on this point and supporting the documents proves it.
300 kg is the maximum they are allowed to enrich per the NPT.
The next line of the report states the amount of that limit that they have actually refined and have in storage.
That would put them at 24 years of fuel for four reactors, which is not unreasonable.
You lied.
And Iran doesn't have 24 reactors; they have one.
Sorry but you've gone completely insane. You got caught lying and instead of admitting it you resort to making up other people's opinion. The saddest thing is you likely believe your bullshit.I love the fact that you keep defending US interventions, including the US dropping 26,000 bombs on 7 Muslim countries in 2016, yet can't come up with a single story of success.
I blame terrorism on the people who are so immoral as to intentionally murder civilians. But that doesn't fit your agenda so instead of blaming the actual terrorists you have to find someone else to blame. The only question is whether you refuse to blame the terrorists because you think Arabs are incapable of moral behavior or if you are so ideologically blinded that you think the US and Israel are the only countries deserving criticism.You keep claiming you are against terrorism yet fully defend one of its major causes.
You are totally incompetent and really can't read that report, can you?You are hopeless. Even when you are completely exposed you continue to pretend you're right. But including point 15, they have 202.8 kg of Uranium is gas form as well as 88.4 kg in solid form. That's 277 years worth of fuel. And if you cared about honesty, you would notice that I'd be okay with Iran keeping a couple of cascades, just not the 25,000 centrifuges they have working or in storage.
And Iran doesn't have 24 reactors; they have one.
14. - that point describes the limit they are allowed according to the NPT and clarifies that they haven't hit it.
15. - states the actual amount of uranium refined to 3.67% U-235
Only a total idiot would try to add both of those numbers together.
Or a totally dishonest troll type.
p.s. They aren't building new power plants. They aren't even in the planning stages. They simply have people at the government say they want more (and you think the words of the Iranian government aren't important).Because they are building more power plants.
You clearly show you have no ability to understand the science. The 300 kg of gaseous UF6 has already been enriched to 3.67%. It has already gone through the centrifuges. The 88 kg is the amount they processed into solid form. Centrifuges aren't used in that process.You are totally incompetent and really can't read that report, can you?
14. - that point describes the limit they are allowed according to the NPT and clarifies that they haven't hit it.
15. - states the actual amount of uranium refined to 3.67% U-235
Only a total idiot would try to add both of those numbers together.
Or a totally dishonest troll type.
The UN/IAEA report clearly states that Iran has enriched the equivalent of 290 kg.
Sadly you have reverted to type, being proven wrong and resorting to insults and making up what others think.
No matter what farcical arguments you make, Iran has enough enriched uranium to last them a long time and therefore need only a couple hundred centrifuges to maintain those levels.
And back to the topic, both Iran and Saudi Arabia are massive human rights abusers who fund terrorism and continually intervene in other countries in the Middle East and Muslim world.
Of course you only call out Saudi Arabia as a tool to criticize the US and refuse to call out Iran.
Of course you only call out Saudi Arabia as a tool to criticize the US and refuse to call out Iran.
You really don't understand it, do you?You clearly show you have no ability to understand the science. The 300 kg of gaseous UF6 has already been enriched to 3.67%. It has already gone through the centrifuges. The 88 kg is the amount they processed into solid form. Centrifuges aren't used in that process.
The UN/IAEA report clearly states that Iran has enriched the equivalent of 290 kg.
14 says they never exceeded their 300kg limit through the reporting period, as the NYT notes:14. Throughout the reporting period, Iran’s total enriched uranium stockpile has not exceeded
300 kg of UF6 enriched up to 3.67% U-235 (or the equivalent in different chemical forms) (para. 56).
The quantity of 300 kg of UF6 corresponds to 202.8 kg of uranium.17
15. As of 21 August 2017, the quantity of Iran’s uranium enriched up to 3.67% U-235 was
88.4 kg,18 based on the JCPOA and decisions of the Joint Commission.19
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/...-stockpile-of-enriched-uranium-to-russia.htmlIran is permitted to hold 300 kilograms, or about 660 pounds, of low-enriched uranium under the deal. But that is not enough to produce a single weapon.
15 says they have 88 kg in stock, as confirmed by the Independent.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/31/iran-nuclear-deal-trump-unThe International Atomic Energy Agency said that Iran’s stockpile of low-enriched uranium is 88.4kg (about 195lb), less than a third of the maximum allowed under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the official name of the 2015 agreement. Under the agreement, Iran accepted limits on its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. The current stockpile is just over 1% of the pre-agreement level.
You can't add up the amount they are allowed (and never passed) with the amount they actually have and then claim they have both.
Its idiotic.
No, I call out Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iran, in that order based on their human rights records and records of foreign 'interventions' and support of terrorism, domestic or otherwise.And back to the topic, both Iran and Saudi Arabia are massive human rights abusers who fund terrorism and continually intervene in other countries in the Middle East and Muslim world.
Of course you only call out Saudi Arabia as a tool to criticize the US and refuse to call out Iran.
The fact that you still think Iran is better than Israel exposes you for the joke you are. Just to refresh your memory, Israel ranks 80% free. Iran ranks 17% free. I'm sure you will claim it doesn't matter because the writers of the report may be Jewish or have a Jewish SO.No, I call out Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iran, in that order based on their human rights records and records of foreign 'interventions' and support of terrorism, domestic or otherwise.
Based off of one ranking that doesn't consider the occupied territories including Gaza.The fact that you still think Iran is better than Israel exposes you for the joke you are. Just to refresh your memory, Israel ranks 80% free. Iran ranks 17% free. I'm sure you will claim it doesn't matter because the writers of the report may be Jewish or have a Jewish SO.
Oh, by the way, new book came out by a Jewish historian (I note this as you won't consider any non-Jewish historians).
https://oneworld-publications.com/the-biggest-prison-on-earth-hb.html
I'd be happy to buy you a copy.
Oh, and more documents were dropped off to the ICC.
Seems there is a major file opened up there on Israel, strangely nothing happening for Iran, despite your complaints.
https://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=779165
You're right.Based off of one ranking that doesn't consider the occupied territories including Gaza....
Despite the repression of the PA and Israeli imposed travel restrictions, even the West Bank scores 11% higher than Iran.
