I don't want a healthier population. I want to be healthy, and I am overall thus have little healthcare costs, and keep my money.
I bet you would take candy from children if you thought you could get away with it.I don't want a healthier population. I want to be healthy, and I am overall thus have little healthcare costs, and keep my money.
People who make comments like this do not understand the nature an purpose of insurance. Why have car insurance if you never plan on getting in an accident? Why have life insurance if you never plan on dieing?I don't want a healthier population. I want to be healthy, and I am overall thus have little healthcare costs, and keep my money.
Actually it could. The reason why they think it will cost so much is they are assuming allowing the doctors and medical consortums to charge their existing prices. That's not the way it works. They are told the prices they can charge and not allowed to over bill.Yes and if the US transitions into UHC from its current state of being unhealthy costs will ridiculously high
With such ignorant opinions, its little wonder Trump was elected by American voters.I don't want a healthier population. I want to be healthy, and I am overall thus have little healthcare costs, and keep my money.
Certainly the USA could have done universal healthcare cheaper and easier back when the rest of the developed world did it in the fifties. But it's sad to imagine that great country admitting it just can't manage to get it done, when the evidence is indisputable that universal, single payer healthcare is cheaper, better and more efficient than the costly, inefficient make-do patchwork Americans have to deal with now.No they were seriously considering it and did the math and concluded it wouldn't work given the current costs in the USA
It works in other countries because healthcare already costs less, so spreading the cost around to all citizens requires less taxation than it would in the USA.
Also, their populations are smaller and their people are healthier
Maybe if the USA did healthcare for all 100 years ago and stuck with it, we would be in a better position today
But to transition into it now will be ludicrously expensive
Given that the Democrats allowed no amendments quite how do you believe the above to be true?The problems were created by the Republicans.
Or more likely a Swiss systemEventually America will have a Swedish style health care regime...
Trump has no ideas, no plan .. just hot air. Trump supporters love fluff but can't follow substance so while Trump promised that he had a replacement for Obama care that covered everyone with low cost, etc, etc., ... it was bullshit swallowed up by followers unable to realise there was no plan.And STILL no direction from Trump. No proposal from the WH.
It does not matter if it is the swiss, Canadian, UK, Danish, Sweden, German, French universal healthcare. All civilized nations has a universal Health care system vastly superior to the American free market system. (Cuba may have the best system.)Or more likely a Swiss system
Which is astounding.Trump has no ideas, no plan .. just hot air. Trump supporters love fluff but can't follow substance so while Trump promised that he had a replacement for Obama care that covered everyone with low cost, etc, etc., ... it was bullshit swallowed up by followers unable to realise there was no plan.