CBC report - Most Canadians don't think humans are the main cause of climate change

[Moviefan-2]

He bet me whether or not the temperature anomaly would increase by at least a further 0.15ºC to a minimum of 0.83ºC in 2015.

I bet you whether or not 2015 would hit 0.83ºC....

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

:thumb:

We did not bet on a year to year change from 2014.

It takes a certain kind of person to post something that shows himself to be a lying fool.

 

[Frankfooter]

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Moviefan-2]

Moviefan then accuses NASA and NOAA of fraud....

Why are NASA's numbers for the global temperature so different from this one paper you are quoting?
How come you keep defending both of them?

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

 

[Frankfooter]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

.

:thumb:

We've already gone over you bad math.
You've confirmed that the bet was based on a 1995-2015 term and your references to 2014 are wrong.

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Frankfooter]

We bet that the temperature anomaly would increase in 2015 to 0.83ºC

You posted a graph that showed a 0.43ºC anomaly for 1995 and we agreed to bet on whether there would be a minimum increase of 0.4ºC over 20 years.

So we bet on the remaining distance from the original 1995 anomaly of 0.43ºC.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

Frankfooter says 0.74 + 0.15 = 0.83.

I have never said any such thing, its yet another weasel move, an out and out direct lie.

I bet you whether or not 2015 would hit 0.83ºC...

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

No math is needed, you can keep your broken abacus out of this.

 

[Moviefan-2]

We've already gone over you bad math.

Frankfooter says in post 204 that it's "not possible" for 0.89 to equal 0.89.

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...imate-change&p=5489838&viewfull=1#post5489838

Of course, when I add that to his collection of greatest hits, he'll claim the quote is being taken out of context. :biggrin1:

 

[Frankfooter]

LMFAO! :biggrin1:

Time for a break while we all enjoy a bit of Moviefan's favourite game.

How to use partial quotes strung together as if they meant something else, or the Moviefan quoting game:

I'll repeat my post again.

the fact remains that

I do agree with Frankfooter

I

have been so consistently and spectacularly wrong.

I will stand by my conclusion that

the bet confirms

I was

consistently and spectacularly wrong.

I believe that's what used to be known as

I

failed science.

 

[Frankfooter]

Frankfooter says in post 204 that it's "not possible" for 0.89 to equal 0.89.

Here, go ahead and explain why you think your math is correct.
Let me just cue up yakety sax for full effect.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Here, go ahead and explain why you think your math is correct.

Indeed.

Check out the line that he added to my description of the bet using 1995 as the starting year: "The 1995 anomaly was 0.43ºC for the bet - 0.43 + 0.4 (the bet) + 0.15 ≠ 0.89"

http://i1308.photobucket.com/albums/s609/moviefanisaweasel/weasel math_zps7rfsroxp.jpg

Say what???

The 0.15 change from 2014 to 2015 was part of the 0.4 increase over 20 years in the original bet.

Using the original graph, Frankfooter is claiming the bet was that 0.43 + 0.4 + 0.15 = 0.83!

:Eek:

He has confirmed what I have been saying for months -- he never passed Grade 3 math! :biggrin1:

 

[Frankfooter]

I
Using the original graph, Frankfooter is claiming the bet was that 0.43 + 0.4 + 0.15 = 0.83!

Not at all.
I was showing how even your attempts at cheating the bet used bad math.
The bet was on 2015 hitting 0.83ºC.
0.43ºC (1995's reported anomaly at the time of the bet) + 0.4 (two decades of the IPCC projection of 0.2ºC) = 0.83ºC
Any claims that I think your 'adjustments' are anything other then bullshit weasel moves is a lie.

Your 'adjusted' number of 0.15 was never part of the bet and in fact you promised to continue the bet on the original terms stated above on June 17, after we first had this discussion.

In any event, it's settled. The bet that you and I made on May 10, 2015, stands.

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Frankfooter]

We bet that the temperature anomaly would increase in 2015 to 0.83ºC

You posted a graph that showed a 0.43ºC anomaly for 1995 and we agreed to bet on whether there would be a minimum increase of 0.4ºC over 20 years.

So we bet on the remaining distance from the original 1995 anomaly of 0.43ºC.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Moviefan-2]

Not at all.
I was showing how even your attempts at cheating the bet used bad math.

Really? My "attempts"?

Show us where you think I said the bet was 0.43 + 0.4 + 0.15. :biggrin1:

 

[Frankfooter]

Really? My "attempts"?

Show us where I said the bet was 0.43 + 0.4 + 0.15.

Post #189
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...imate-change&p=5489438&viewfull=1#post5489438

Let me show you where on June 17 you promised to keep to the bet without any 'adjustments' like your '0.15' adjustment.
This was after you first tried to 'adjust' the bet to 0.86ºC.

In any event, it's settled. The bet that you and I made on May 10, 2015, stands.

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Moviefan-2]

Post #189

LMFAO! The only person quoted using that equation in post 189 is you.

I knew it. You don't know where the 0.89 number came from because you can't count that high!

 

[Frankfooter]

I knew it. You don't know where the 0.89 number came from because you can't count that high!

That number came from your post.

It was part of one of your many 'adjustments' that you gave your word you wouldn't make.
Why can't you keep your word?

In any event, it's settled. The bet that you and I made on May 10, 2015, stands.

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Frankfooter]

We bet that the temperature anomaly would increase in 2015 to 0.83ºC

You posted a graph that showed a 0.43ºC anomaly for 1995 and we agreed to bet on whether there would be a minimum increase of 0.4ºC over 20 years.

So we bet on the remaining distance from the original 1995 anomaly of 0.43ºC.

NASA reported:
- 2015 anomaly: 0.87ºC

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[Moviefan-2]

That number came from your post.

I can't believe it! You're dodging the question!

I didn't ask you what post it came from. I asked what the mathematical equation was that I used to get the 0.89 number.

You don't know because you can't add that high!

This is hilarious.

 

[Frankfooter]

I asked what the mathematical equation was that I used to get the 0.89 number.

Are you expecting me to try to figure out your faulty weasel math?
Screw you, I'm not going down that rabbit hole.


What I want to know is whether you lie your face off on every post, or just the occasional one.
Were you lying when you said this in June, agreeing to not 'adjust the bet':

In any event, it's settled. The bet that you and I made on May 10, 2015, stands.

Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?

 

[AK-47]

Maybe he's both?? Just like ManBearPig, he's ManWeasel