So indy's are still cool?Here's some summary tweets from https://twitter.com/Justin_Ling
- Bill is out, advertising sexual services is now illegal.
- Purchasing sexual services is now illegal, as expected.
- Obtaining sexual services for a fee carried a punishment of up to five years, or a fine of $1000-$4000
- Penalties are stiffer if sex is purchased in public, or near a park, school, or religious institution.
- Getting gain from sex work (living off the avails) still criminalized, with the exception of bodyguards or family. (Possibly others)
- You are guilty of materially benefiting from a sex worker if you provided them drugs, or if you are a business.
- It looks like this bill is heavily going after businesses -- massage parlours and brothels.
- If you advertise sexual services, you could face five years of jailtime or $5000
- Sex workers can't be charged for living off the profit of their own work.
- Sex workers will be allowed to advertise their own work.
I actually don't have a problem with that part at allThis Bill still goes after Street Walkers who are soliciting in public near a mall or a school or a playground.
" (1.1) Everyone is guilty of an offence punishable
on summary conviction who communicates
with any person — for the purpose of offering
or providing sexual services for
consideration — in a public place, or in any
place open to public view, that is or is next to a
place where persons under the age of 18 can
reasonably be expected to be present.
Obviously, it hasn't. All of his tweets should read "would be, under the new law" rather than "is".when did it get voted on and passed?
No, unless they a find a way to have a website to advertise companionship or dating services without the "BBBJ, PSE, CIM". They can't advertise selling sexual services on a website but there are ways around that.So indy's are still cool?
Yep, which is why it may (a slight chance) be rejected by the SCC.3 Purchasing sexual services is now illegal, as expected
Weird how you will not be able to purchase something that is legal to advertise?
Meh...I'll worry about this when/if it becomes law....back to looking at the pretty picturesNo, unless they a find a way to have a website to advertise companionship or dating services without the "BBBJ, PSE, CIM". They can't advertise selling sexual services on a website but there are ways around that.
Going to say "Are you a cop?" More often. Ladies get ready to be paid after the session is over. However, I will probably stick to trusted Indies and Agencies as I often repeat with my ATFs.I guess the new protocol when you arrive at the incall or wherever is that before money is exchanged or even mentioned the escort is going to have to grab your dick to let you know she is not a cop.
The SCC problem will be that it might take years to get there and meanwhile the new laws are in place.Yep, which is why it may (a slight chance) be rejected by the SCC.
It does not. You don't get off of drug trafficking charges by claiming to be a vendor of journeys to the inner mind and psyche.1 If you advertise sexual services, you could face five years of jailtime or $5000
The usual disclaimer from an escort service saying "we only supply companionship" solves that.
Terb is forum and it would be against freedom of speech to shut it down. Nothing in the bill that say anything about forums like terb. Just can't advertise selling sell, so the Indys and agencies now advertise dating and companion services without the "BBBJ, CIM,etc." Guess we'll have to wright discrete dating reviews like "Sally and I went to Earls for some cocktails and then a movie and back to Sally's place for some desert. Truly had a wonderful with Sally and enjoyed her companionship. PM me if you have any questions".I haven't read the bill yet, and I'm not a lawyer but I see appeals all over this. And I'm willing to bet that Fred is talking to his lawyers about the advertising on TERB.