Bill C-36 tabled (New Prostitution Law)

[elise]

Sorry to come to this so late & if this question has already been asked, sorry again, but of the three sex industries; SPs, MPAs & dancers who will be affected the most?
Strip clubs are open areas ( even the VIPs) & liquor licenses require that LE be given unfettered access at all times so back to "air" dances, I guess?
MPs are also established in a licensed facility & from what I understand there has to be a window in all the doors & a nude woman rubbing herself allover a nude oiled-up man could only for a sexually gratifying purpose IMHO.
SPs have a closed door often in an apartment or home which would be considered a dwelling house so a warent would be required for entery , a time consuming process, from what I would think ( I don't last all that long any more so good luck getting the paperwork done before I'm showered & out the door)
So on balance I think the SPs come out on top, what do you guys think?

Read some of the first pages of this thread. It will pretty much answer your questions.
The big deal is the new law makes it a criminal offence with potential fines and jail time if you pay for a SEXUAL SERVICE.

Go figure what a sexual service is because it is not defined. I guess the judge will decide in the courtroom if he/she considers it a sexual service.

I would rank your list exactly opposite, SC safest, MP or SP not very safe. The interpretation may come down to where it is the easiest to be caught paying for a sexual service.

 

[lurkerdick]

Blowjobs should be safe use the Clinton plea

 

[GPIDEAL]

Granted, but that risk will be most significant when the buyer himself is taking unnecessary risk - trolling BP, seeing unknown/untested providers, etc. Yes, those days of thrill-seeking may well be over. But, I highly doubt anyone sticking to well-reviewed, long-established SP's in this for the log haul is going to find themself in any kind of scenario as described above.

Well said!

 

[GPIDEAL]

I read somewhere that the money to police Bill C-36 will come from the $20 million that Mackay announced last week which doesn't leave a lot for the Church groups that supported the Bill, let alone the escorts who need to be "rescued".

When I saw that brought up, I immediately assumed that it would cost about $10 million to administer, allocate and deliver the funds.

I'm pretty sure that fund will go into things like rehab programs, awareness campaigns, retraining grants and other currently in place programs that are already available and seem more a token gesture to make the government appear sympathetic. Some jobs will get created so that they can pat themselves on the back. It's a completely self-serving announcement.

What's also possible gentlemen is that the $20 million can be used to set up sting operations with promises of financial aid to escorts willing to get a pay off in return for leaving the industry.