Rule Number 1 of Fight Club..
- Thread starter mur11
- Start date
yeah..thats it.Maybe its as simple as 7.5 can't get laid?
Not sure what that has to do with shilling ...but whatever helps you.
lots of anger...grrrrrrr.
just wondering why this guy cant tell us how many of his reviews were done with the girl sitting right there. And it isnt "none". So which should we believe of the reviews?
There shouldnt be any need for "new material". This is the whole point of a review board.
If you were laughing you would have just answered why this guy shills or why they arent shills as opposed to " why so angry' or something else not even relevant.
Either way. I am not the only one who is seeing this. So I will let you and the other three of you guys to have your fun.
Just wondering what the point of a review board is, if we are allowed to shill the ladies we want.
Here's an observation. Make of it what you will.
I looked through the posts on this thread, and so far I haven't seen anyone put forward a strong defence of the idea that you can reveal your identity to the SPs and/or agency and still write an impartial and credible review.
So far, it seems the people who have disagreed with my perspective have mostly taken the position that all reviews have to be taken with a grain of salt. That may certainly be true, but it doesn't necessarily rebut the concerns raised by people such as me.
I do wonder if there is something to think about here.
The Fruity Hare is probably right -- nothing is likely going to change. But I do think this is something worth thinking about. Maybe I have a little bit of Don Quixote in me.
I looked through the posts on this thread, and so far I haven't seen anyone put forward a strong defence of the idea that you can reveal your identity to the SPs and/or agency and still write an impartial and credible review.
So far, it seems the people who have disagreed with my perspective have mostly taken the position that all reviews have to be taken with a grain of salt. That may certainly be true, but it doesn't necessarily rebut the concerns raised by people such as me.
I do wonder if there is something to think about here.
The Fruity Hare is probably right -- nothing is likely going to change. But I do think this is something worth thinking about. Maybe I have a little bit of Don Quixote in me.
Even if we assume (and that is a major assumption) for a moment that the review is biased. Are you saying that it is 100% pure bullshit. If the reviewer says the lady is facially a 10, should we automatically assume she is actually a 0?
In my business (not SP related), we can improve our service to "high value" clients by only an incremental finite amount, say 5% to 10%. We cannot improve it by 100% above the baseline no matter how much we like a particular client.
No, I'm not saying that.
I mean, I accept as a given that most SPs in this city will offer some sort of BJ (CBJ or BBBJ) and allow for some sort of intercourse. So, naturally, there will be some truth to any review, I would think (unless someone wrote a review of an SP that he's never even met).
The issue of believability centres on concerns about reviews being embellished. I have taken the view that reviewers who don't protect their identities might have an incentive to "air brush" the descriptions of their experiences, in order to pander to SPs and agencies.
As Kya_Jean said in another thread, a smart SP will offer "top services" to people who are known to be positive reviewers. Do some reviewers pander to that by always writing glowing reviews, regardless of their actual experiences?
It may or may not be happening. But I think the perception that reviews may be tainted when the reviewer's identity is known to SPs and/or agencies is a legitimate concern.
And I do think it is a central issue in the ongoing discussions about the "believability" of reviews.
fight club?
some of ed nortons best work.........
sorry could not resist.
back to your bickering ladies
some of ed nortons best work.........
sorry could not resist.
back to your bickering ladies
the only time it's come up is the question:
"Where did you hear of me, the mens room wall or terb?"
I've always thought this is a valid marketing question. The lady is running a business, it's astute business practice to enquire efficacy of advertising, she deserves to know, no privacy boundary is being crossed by admitting source when being asked. When being asked.
What I've learned here over the years is some people are not so astute in their answers.
Terb, is answer enough. Any more and, in most cases, a discretionary line is crossed. Why some people continue on with in detail conversations thereof is beyond me, and probably the end result is various controversies played over the years.
Several independant ladies I saw asked the above question. At the end one asked for something to be written as she had no presence here and realized it would take time to build one; she didn't ask for specific content, just something be written. I thought this was a totally legitamate and professionally discrete marketing request. One lady even showed me laptop screen with posts about her and described both her rabid lovers and haters, a post where the shill-hurtbag-loser crew (©Elisha) were yelling shill and her id was clearly different. Several described deep ambivalence, an anti-SP ambience: to this date, although members, they have never posted, going back now 7+ years.
Also, I never booked through this board's pm system, indeed hardly ever used it, maybe 3 times in 7 years. Always and only a phone call: serious, discrete - no board names.
I agree it's easy for the ladies to put a name and date to a board id based on review - events, writing style, date and time, etc. But, if reviewers were to honour most ladies' request to truly write a non-descript, non-specific, non-gynacological pornographic review, the probability of identifying said terbite would greatly diminish.
Also, why some moron terbites have a 1:00 appointment then write a review at 2:30 "Just saw Valentine Luv..." and expect to remain anyonymous????
And I'll never forget Jackie at bodyandsoul's epiphany: "I get a bad review and get overbooked with new clients".
"Where did you hear of me, the mens room wall or terb?"
I've always thought this is a valid marketing question. The lady is running a business, it's astute business practice to enquire efficacy of advertising, she deserves to know, no privacy boundary is being crossed by admitting source when being asked. When being asked.
What I've learned here over the years is some people are not so astute in their answers.
Terb, is answer enough. Any more and, in most cases, a discretionary line is crossed. Why some people continue on with in detail conversations thereof is beyond me, and probably the end result is various controversies played over the years.
Several independant ladies I saw asked the above question. At the end one asked for something to be written as she had no presence here and realized it would take time to build one; she didn't ask for specific content, just something be written. I thought this was a totally legitamate and professionally discrete marketing request. One lady even showed me laptop screen with posts about her and described both her rabid lovers and haters, a post where the shill-hurtbag-loser crew (©Elisha) were yelling shill and her id was clearly different. Several described deep ambivalence, an anti-SP ambience: to this date, although members, they have never posted, going back now 7+ years.
Also, I never booked through this board's pm system, indeed hardly ever used it, maybe 3 times in 7 years. Always and only a phone call: serious, discrete - no board names.
I agree it's easy for the ladies to put a name and date to a board id based on review - events, writing style, date and time, etc. But, if reviewers were to honour most ladies' request to truly write a non-descript, non-specific, non-gynacological pornographic review, the probability of identifying said terbite would greatly diminish.
Also, why some moron terbites have a 1:00 appointment then write a review at 2:30 "Just saw Valentine Luv..." and expect to remain anyonymous????
And I'll never forget Jackie at bodyandsoul's epiphany: "I get a bad review and get overbooked with new clients".
