CBC report - Most Canadians don't think humans are the main cause of climate change
- Thread starter Moviefan-2
- Start date
We've already gone over you bad math.
You've confirmed that the bet was based on a 1995-2015 term and your references to 2014 are wrong.
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
LMFAO! :biggrin1:
Frankfooter says in post 204 that it's "not possible" for 0.89 to equal 0.89.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...imate-change&p=5489838&viewfull=1#post5489838
Of course, when I add that to his collection of greatest hits, he'll claim the quote is being taken out of context. :biggrin1:
Time for a break while we all enjoy a bit of Moviefan's favourite game.
How to use partial quotes strung together as if they meant something else, or the Moviefan quoting game:
Here, go ahead and explain why you think your math is correct.
Let me just cue up yakety sax for full effect.
Indeed.
Check out the line that he added to my description of the bet using 1995 as the starting year: "The 1995 anomaly was 0.43ºC for the bet - 0.43 + 0.4 (the bet) + 0.15 ≠ 0.89"
http://i1308.photobucket.com/albums/s609/moviefanisaweasel/weasel math_zps7rfsroxp.jpg
Say what???
The 0.15 change from 2014 to 2015 was part of the 0.4 increase over 20 years in the original bet.
Using the original graph, Frankfooter is claiming the bet was that 0.43 + 0.4 + 0.15 = 0.83!
:Eek:
He has confirmed what I have been saying for months -- he never passed Grade 3 math! :biggrin1:
Not at all.
I was showing how even your attempts at cheating the bet used bad math.
The bet was on 2015 hitting 0.83ºC.
0.43ºC (1995's reported anomaly at the time of the bet) + 0.4 (two decades of the IPCC projection of 0.2ºC) = 0.83ºC
Any claims that I think your 'adjustments' are anything other then bullshit weasel moves is a lie.
Your 'adjusted' number of 0.15 was never part of the bet and in fact you promised to continue the bet on the original terms stated above on June 17, after we first had this discussion.
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
Really? My "attempts"?
Show us where you think I said the bet was 0.43 + 0.4 + 0.15. :biggrin1:
Post #189
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...imate-change&p=5489438&viewfull=1#post5489438
Let me show you where on June 17 you promised to keep to the bet without any 'adjustments' like your '0.15' adjustment.
This was after you first tried to 'adjust' the bet to 0.86ºC.
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
LMFAO! The only person quoted using that equation in post 189 is you.
I knew it. You don't know where the 0.89 number came from because you can't count that high!
That number came from your post.
It was part of one of your many 'adjustments' that you gave your word you wouldn't make.
Why can't you keep your word?
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
I can't believe it! You're dodging the question!
I didn't ask you what post it came from. I asked what the mathematical equation was that I used to get the 0.89 number.
You don't know because you can't add that high!
This is hilarious.
Are you expecting me to try to figure out your faulty weasel math?
Screw you, I'm not going down that rabbit hole.
What I want to know is whether you lie your face off on every post, or just the occasional one.
Were you lying when you said this in June, agreeing to not 'adjust the bet':
Are you a weasel or a man?
Is your word worthless or will you keep it?
