I haven't responded to him in years. He isn't worth the pixels.Stop projecting...Oh man this is just too funny.
I haven't responded to him in years. He isn't worth the pixels.Stop projecting...Oh man this is just too funny.
well, Steve bannon types seem to be surrounding only one of the candidates though and it ain’t Joe…….Trump wins, has cognitive issues, and it's Steve Bannon types running the show. Do you support that notion?
There is no valid choice.
Depends on your politics. War mongers seem to be surrounding Joe right now. Kinda right wing doncha think?well, Steve bannon types seem to be surrounding only one of the candidates though and it ain’t Joe…![]()
I’m just talking about jailbirdsDepends on your politics. War mongers seem to be surrounding Joe right now. Kinda right wing doncha think?
I'd say policy matters too. Right now there is a clear isolationist mindset trending in various demographics in the USA. Whether it is about War funding overseas, Immigration policy, or Trade Policy. In fact it's coming to the fore in several nations. That has as much to do with Joe Biden's bad numbers as his cognitive decline. He isn't actually in favor of policy Many of his demographics voters are. Nor are his advisors.I’m just talking about jailbirds
Okay let me ask you this. What would you rather: having a criminal make policy decisions or having every policy choice determined by a generator of random numbers?I'd say policy matters too. Right now there is a clear isolationist mindset trending in various demographics in the USA. Whether it is about War funding overseas, Immigration policy, or Trade Policy. In fact it's coming to the fore in several nations. That has as much to do with Joe Biden's bad numbers as his cognitive decline. He isn't actually in favor of policy Many of his demographics voters are. Nor are his advisors.
This matters. On what information he gets, how it is presented, and the way they frame options for decisions. Add in his reliance now on them because quite frankly I doubt his is capable of reading detailed reports, and coming to his own conclusions and the question already being asked on the street is a simple one
"WHO IS ACTUALLY IN CHARGE?"

Okay let me ask you this. What would you rather: having a criminal make policy decisions or having every policy choice determined by a generator of random numbers?
because when I hear Trump saying “they wouldn’t dare to start shit when I’m in office” I’ll tell you they sure wouldn’t start shit if they can have a terrifyingly random response (on second thought, it’s not even that different though)
View attachment 339384
Depends how it's contexted. Biden having a sudden "health crisis" sidesteps the whole "how did you let it get so far?!" debate.The big issue they have is replacing Biden means admitting they KNEW HOW BAD HE WAS. And were willing to put him in anyway. That reflects on the whole party and will affect independent voters.
Nope...that's you twisting things into your usual attack of suggesting someone is being racist when you don't like questions being asked.Its the same subject, skoob.
You're on the attack because you agree with rump that POTUS isn't a 'black job', so you are trying to attack Harris.
No, skoob, this is about you pushing that Harris shouldn't be POTUS because you, like rump, think that's not a 'black job'.Nope...that's you twisting things into your usual attack of suggesting someone is being racist when you don't like questions being asked.
YOU make things into a race issue when all other things to back up your arguments fail.
I just find it hypocritical when you and your friends here immediately suggest Newsom and totally overlook Harris with the only reason being "she couldn't win" and no explanation as to why?
Nope...I was actually implying that she should replace Biden rather than Newsom.No, skoob, this is about you pushing that Harris shouldn't be POTUS because you, like rump, think that's not a 'black job'.
There is no other reason why you've been so focused on attacking her.
No, skoob, that's not what you've been doing here.Nope...I was actually implying that she should replace Biden rather than Newsom.
It was and your friends that said she couldn't win and couldn't (or wouldn't) explain why.
And like a true leftist, when confronted with a good question you don't like, you immediately start accusing others of being racist.
Typical & pathetic but fun to watch.
You realize that the photo is tinted, huh?
Ha! Who is the Orange man bad now! And more bad news for the campaign.
Nope.No, skoob, that's not what you've been doing here.
You've been trolling because you think POTUS isn't a 'black job', like trump
You brought up race.
I note that the same sad YT page also supports your favourite presidential candidate, RFK Jr.
Ha! Who is the Orange man bad now! And more bad news for the campaign.
You have yet to say that trump is wrong to say there are 'black jobs'.Nope.
Why would I say that if Obama was POTUS? Your attempts at spewing a false narrative as well as false accusations are at play again. You're not fooling anyone with your "go on the attack" tactic to distract again.
I asked why Harris wasn't being considered by the people who said Newsom would be better.
What I heard was crickets after that.
You want to discuss what Trump said?...Great!...then start a thread of your own rather than hijacking this one like Hamas supporters hijacked the Pride Parade.You have yet to say that trump is wrong to say there are 'black jobs'.
All you've done is argue that Harris shouldn't be POTUS.
You are pushing the trump narrative.






