Wife Ex-Prostitute
- Thread starter danjay
- Start date
Once a "provider," always a "provider."
Check out this article: http://elitedaily.com/dating/gentlemen/turn-hoe-housewife/
This is the guy that Closer wants us to take advice on relationships.I am close friends with a couple who has proven that wrong through 7 years, and 3 kids. Quite happily I'm pleased to say.
KK
[video=youtube;qgJ2Xk58T0Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qgJ2Xk58T0Y[/video]
Nonsense. Don't buy into the big lie, SP's are just regular women.Once a "provider," always a "provider."
Check out this article: http://elitedaily.com/dating/gentlemen/turn-hoe-housewife/
I have sensed in post after post a disparaging attitude about the sex trade from you. That in combination with your exaggerated stories is.... interesting.
Would need to know more but would you agree that they are the exception rather than the rule?I am close friends with a couple who has proven that wrong through 7 years, and 3 kids. Quite happily I'm pleased to say.
Well it's a two-pronged strategy that I recommend. On the one hand, I believe you should have a God-fearing (even if you're not) "good girl" wife at home to raise your kids with. Outside of that, you should bang as many sloppy 21 year olds as possible.Nope, find them, feel them, fuck and forget them.
"Providers" and wives are two different types. I think the vast majority of men know this intuitively and, if they're being honest, most "providers" do too.SP's are just regular women.
Not true. It's just a different category of relationship, not a different category of woman. It's like saying once a friend, always a friend, YOU might be in friend zone, but that woman has other sorts of relationships with other men. And while there are barriers, you can get out of friend zone, and you can cross the barriers between provider/customer to something else well."Providers" and wives are two different types. I think the vast majority of men know this intuitively and, if they're being honest, most "providers" do too.
Lots of women leave the sex trade. The majority do, they go on to lead completely normal lives.
You have psychological issues to work out relating to women and the sex trade.
Sorry, but your experience is nothing like mine. I know several SP's, current and retired, that are quite happy in long-term relationships or marriage. In my own relationship with an SP, I was hard-pressed in having her accept me paying for anything. Her argument was that she makes much more than I do, and it was her idea to go out, so she pays. I know you will claim that these are exceptions, but I see your argument as the madonna/whore fallacy.Would need to know more but would you agree that they are the exception rather than the rule?
Well it's a two-pronged strategy that I recommend. On the one hand, I believe you should have a God-fearing (even if you're not) "good girl" wife at home to raise your kids with. Outside of that, you should bang as many sloppy 21 year olds as possible.
Providers" and wives are two different types. I think the vast majority of men know this intuitively and, if they're being honest, most "providers" do too.
You can't paint SP's with the same brush, or women with the 2 same brushes. By being a client of SP's, I could accuse you of being fat, balding, rich businessman with a wife and kids in the suburbs. Would I be right? Since the general perception of john is what I mentioned then it must be true.
So wives are only important for two things, cooking and raising your kids. Where did you find her, Christian Mingles? What lies did you tell her?Would need to know more but would you agree that they are the exception rather than the rule?
Well it's a two-pronged strategy that I recommend. On the one hand, I believe you should have a God-fearing (even if you're not) "good girl" wife at home to raise your kids with. Outside of that, you should bang as many sloppy 21 year olds as possible.
"Providers" and wives are two different types. I think the vast majority of men know this intuitively and, if they're being honest, most "providers" do too.
It makes you wonder who she's doing while you're out doing sloppy 21 year old.
Some do, I'm sure, but some don't. I know one SP who has repeatedly said that her clients are relationships, and over the years she has found out much about them and treasures the trust they put in her.Very true. No two sps I've met were alike but I do wonder if they see us as all the same. It's not like we can always tell them our entire life story nor do we want to.
You can't turn a "provider" into a housewife.
I personally think I would make a great wife. IF I found the right man. I can be very domestic if I want to be....
Having read your posts over the years, and met you once long ago, I would definitely agree.I personally think I would make a great wife. IF I found the right man. I can be very domestic if I want to be....
If by marrying a SP, it would guarantee great sex for a very long time, I'm in. Sex-free marriages are why many of us are here.
I do not agree. The reason you are here is because the man must always change girl. The 'man is NOT monogamous. The man is a hunter woman. The man is a fucker escort girl :wink:If by marrying a SP, it would guarantee great sex for a very long time, I'm in. Sex-free marriages are why many of us are here.
A wife's role is to be the backbone of the family. Ideally, she'd be beautiful, virtuous, a great mother to your children, and a good cook.So wives are only important for two things, cooking and raising your kids.
I think that's a great idea. I wouldn't recommend marrying a woman who wasn't fiercely devoted to her faith, whatever it may be.Where did you find her, Christian Mingles?
You're definitely going to have to lie to her. She'll need to believe that you are also devoutly religious and monogamous in order for things to work.What lies did you tell her?
Based on what criteria? Given mine, I respectfully disagree with you.I personally think I would make a great wife.
Hasn't happened yet, right? Will likely never happen given your advanced age.IF I found the right man.
Meaning what? I simply don't think you'd be capable of bonding with a man - or being faithful to him - in the same way as a 20 year old virgin would be.I can be very domestic if I want to be....
So you lie to your women regularly, especially your wife, yet you want your wife to be virtuous, beautiful, a good cook, and a great mother. Good luck with that kind of hypocrisy, your ,arried n nam only, just haven't done the paperwork.A wife's role is to be the backbone of the family. Ideally, she'd be beautiful, virtuous, a great mother to your children, and a good cook.
I think that's a great idea. I wouldn't recommend marrying a woman who wasn't fiercely devoted to her faith, whatever it may be.
You're definitely going to have to lie to her. She'll need to believe that you are also devoutly religious and monogamous in order for things to work.
As I said, iI wonder who's she doing in your absence. You and FUJI make a great couple.
Based on what criteria? Given mine, I respectfully disagree with you.
Hasn't happened yet, right? Will likely never happen given your advanced age.
Meaning what? I simply don't think you'd be capable of bonding with a man - or being faithful to him - in the same way as a 20 year old virgin would be.
Wow. At 36, I don't know if I would call that 'advanced age'. And I highly doubt that if I had married someone as a 20 year old virgin, it would have lasted long. I have had no shortage of options or proposals over the last few years by the way. And I still have options - I can think of four men who would probably marry me right now in a heartbeat if I agreed. But thanks for your opinion.
But I am the not the type to settle down easily. I guess I like my freedom too much. Just like many men....
Well, the rule of thumb - at time of marriage - is generally Woman's Age = (Man's Age/2) + 7. That means you are equivalent to a 58 year old man, so yeah that's pretty advanced.At 36, I don't know if I would call that 'advanced age'.
Plus a 36 year old woman's eggs are essentially useless from a biological perspective (see chart: http://www.ds-health.com/risk.htm).
That may be true, but your odds of success have only gotten worse over time.I highly doubt that if I had married someone as a 20 year old virgin, it would have lasted long
I don't doubt it, as I'm sure you're a lovely lady. I do question these guys' judgement, however.I have had no shortage of options or proposals over the last few years by the way.
This essentially captures the reasons I believe one cannot turn "providers" into housewives.I can think of four men who would probably marry me right now in a heartbeat if I agreed... But I am the not the type to settle down easily. I guess I like my freedom too much. Just like many men....
Wives DON'T keep multiple men at the ready. Wives ARE the type to settle down easily. Wives DON'T like freedom too much. Wives are NOTHING like men.
Uhhhh, no. That formula is for calculating the minimum age for a woman in a given relationship, not an equivalency. It means that a 58 year old man shouldn't be dating a woman in her 20s, not that 36 is any sort of "target age" for him. The idea that it's an equivalency is ludicrous.Well, the rule of thumb - at time of marriage - is generally Woman's Age = (Man's Age/2) + 7. That means you are equivalent to a 58 year old man, so yeah that's pretty advanced.
That may be true, but your odds of success have only gotten worse over time.
I have had men show more interest in me/marrying me in the last few years than at any other time before in my life. So my 'success rate' appears to be improving.
I do agree however that it may not last that long. That is why I am generally confused.... lol
