Wife Ex-Prostitute
- Thread starter danjay
- Start date
Blackies Mom is his girlfriend.Come on, Blackie's mom said he couldn't have a girlfriend until he turned 18.
Obviously, we don't all have the same definition in mind, when it comes to the word "love".
Some type-A chaps are in what appears to be a perfectly ok relationship, but then, if the Type-A found that the lady used to be an escort, he would immediately kick her out into the street - simply and only for that reason.
At the other extreme, the Type-B chap accepts the lady's past as part of her, as a person - whatever it is, it's her past, and part of her, and it makes no more difference, to the Type-B chap, than if he'd found out e.g that she'd once been bankrupt. The Type-B chap does not want his lady to be different, in any way, from what she is. He loves her for who she is, not for what he wants her to be.
IMO, the Type-A chap does not love the lady. Insofar as he can be said to love the lady, at all -- what he "loves" is his idea of what he wants her to be like. If she doesn't match his idea of what he wants her to be, he wants revenge, and out she goes.
The Type-B chap loves his lady unconditionally. He loves her in the same way most people love their mother. (Not talking here about sexual side, just about the commitment side. Very few people would think of kicking their mother out into the street (emotionally), if they found out she used to be an escort.) The Type-B chap might not like it that his lady, whom he loves unconditionally, used to be an escort -- but it does not make any difference to his commitment to her -- just as it would not make any difference in regard to his mother - or his daughter.
IMO, love is unconditional. If it's not unconditional, it's not love. The interesting paradox is that it is possible to love more than one woman. A bigamist, for example, might well love both his wives unconditionally.
If you're a Type-A, and you require your lady to match your expectations, or out she goes -- you're too wrapped up in yourself. But it's in you to change.
Some type-A chaps are in what appears to be a perfectly ok relationship, but then, if the Type-A found that the lady used to be an escort, he would immediately kick her out into the street - simply and only for that reason.
At the other extreme, the Type-B chap accepts the lady's past as part of her, as a person - whatever it is, it's her past, and part of her, and it makes no more difference, to the Type-B chap, than if he'd found out e.g that she'd once been bankrupt. The Type-B chap does not want his lady to be different, in any way, from what she is. He loves her for who she is, not for what he wants her to be.
IMO, the Type-A chap does not love the lady. Insofar as he can be said to love the lady, at all -- what he "loves" is his idea of what he wants her to be like. If she doesn't match his idea of what he wants her to be, he wants revenge, and out she goes.
The Type-B chap loves his lady unconditionally. He loves her in the same way most people love their mother. (Not talking here about sexual side, just about the commitment side. Very few people would think of kicking their mother out into the street (emotionally), if they found out she used to be an escort.) The Type-B chap might not like it that his lady, whom he loves unconditionally, used to be an escort -- but it does not make any difference to his commitment to her -- just as it would not make any difference in regard to his mother - or his daughter.
IMO, love is unconditional. If it's not unconditional, it's not love. The interesting paradox is that it is possible to love more than one woman. A bigamist, for example, might well love both his wives unconditionally.
If you're a Type-A, and you require your lady to match your expectations, or out she goes -- you're too wrapped up in yourself. But it's in you to change.
For me, no probably doesn't matter.
who the hell should care.
doesn't bother me a bit.
She's gotta learn her bedroom skills from somewhere!
It wouldn't make any difference to me whatsoever.
absolutely agree.
I wouldn't care
You can't turn a "provider" into a housewife.
Once a "provider," always a "provider."Why not?
Check out this article: http://elitedaily.com/dating/gentlemen/turn-hoe-housewife/
Gee don't tell either the younger Alexandre Dumas or Giuseppe Verdi since that is basically what the plot of La traviata is all about.You can't turn a "provider" into a housewife.
But it didn't turn out well for Violetta and Alfredo.Gee don't tell either the younger Alexandre Dumas or Giuseppe Verdi since that is basically what the plot of La traviata is all about.
Says the guy who believes in the 4F's in dating?You can't turn a "provider" into a housewife.
Largely due to their "friends" and family.But it didn't turn out well for Violetta and Alfredo.
Once again, reminded of two lines from the movie "Moulon Rouge":Once a "provider," always a "provider."
Check out this article: http://elitedaily.com/dating/gentlemen/turn-hoe-housewife/
"Once a whore, die a whore".
"Never fall in love with a woman who takes money for sex. It'll only end badly"
I suspect there are some on here who think they all do.Once again, reminded of two lines from the movie "Moulon Rouge":
"Once a whore, die a whore".
"Never fall in love with a woman who takes money for sex. It'll only end badly"
I'm not sure that is/was the point the movie was trying to make.Once again, reminded of two lines from the movie "Moulon Rouge":
"Once a whore, die a whore".
"Never fall in love with a woman who takes money for sex. It'll only end badly"
Good point. As in; they just extract different prices!!!I suspect there are some on here who think they all do.
But don't all relationships have friends and family to deal with?Largely due to their "friends" and family.
Indeed a relative who was an Anglican Priest always said to those assembled during the Wedding Rehearsal that those with the greatest power to destroy this marriage are right here. So strive to support this marriage rather than destroy it.But don't all relationships have friends and family to deal with?
Fucking females for free.Says the guy who believes in the 4F's in dating?
I am close friends with a couple who has proven that wrong through 7 years, and 3 kids. Quite happily I'm pleased to say.You can't turn a "provider" into a housewife.
KK
It depends on the baggage both parties bring to the table. Would be okay with respect but without mutual respect forget it. Some SPs might look down on a hobbyist others understand the variety of reasons why men stray from theie relationships or seek SPs for an hour of female sexual companionship, it all depends. For me, the baggage and respect would matter, no drugs that would be a non-negotiable but being a current or ex-SP is not a major issue, and men that are hobbyists should respect the reasons women become SPs, calling an SP a whore is demeaning I think. Ms. Croft said some guys could accept their past and she is correct. the rest are being hypocritical. My 2 cents.Some guys are fine with it.
I briefly dated someone around this time last year and one night we got on the topic of prostitution and he had confessed to me that he had seen several escorts all over the world. (He travelled a lot for his work). I said it wasn't a big deal because I used to be an escort. He was relieved because he "thought I would judge him".
Okay, so I lied.... I told him that it was in the past even though I was still doing it here and there. But then I confessed because I felt guilty. He basically called me a whore, was nasty to me (told me I sucked dick like a hooker - whatever that means?) and didn't want anything to do with me after that. He said dating a whore would be against his Irish Catholic upbringing. Hyprocrite.
