Uh huh....
Jamaica-luvr said:
what he said....
you're nothing, if not dedicated to proving what an ass you are with every post...you resort to obscenity and name-calling and diversion whenever your so-called "facts" are questioned...
Even Asterix, a fellow US citizen, wonder's why the hell we let you in, and why the hell we let you stay...all other issues this post has created aside...
as far as giving you my email address in a PM, what kind of cretin are you? It's much more likely that the Canadian wife, the education claims, and the 9/11 BS are products of your vivid imagination, and you're still living in mom & dad's basement....you first, my pm box is empty...
When YOU get some facts straight about the relationship between the US and Canada, then post again and offer something thoughtful and incisive, instead of your slanted, inflammatory rhetoric....
You have a PM, containing the message below:
************@yahoo.com
I'll send an edited (personal details removed) resume once you do the same. Edit yours as you see fit - that will tell me to what level I should edit mine.
It was a debate regarding political POVs and the facts to substantiate same. You are the one who questioned my background, etc – I never questioned yours. Now lets see if you are willing to back up your accusations by putting your own up to scrutiny. I'm prepared to show you my educational and professional background - can you prove YOU aren't living in your parents’ basement?
Refute any of my facts - EVEN ONE - then I will "get my facts straight". I note that even though I have quoted easily researched facts and figures, along with links, you have failed to do that - focusing instead on my "obscenity and name-calling".
It seems every time that I post a point to refute your absurd premises, you conveniently then decide you don’t like the tone and tenor with which I delivered the message. But I'm the one using "diversions".
Here, let me help you - I'll refocus the debate:
It is very surprising that Canadians take license to be so critical and judgmental of the United States given that the very standard of living and way of life Canadians enjoy is directly dependent on the United States. It is at best rude, and in my estimation arrogant and unappreciative.
When you suggested that the US and Canada were equally dependent on each other, I pointed out that while US / Canadian trade represents less than 3% of US GDP, it is more than 30% of Canadian GDP. These are FACTS. Take 60 seconds to do a Google search.
When you appeared to suggest that the trade between the US and Canada was not central to Canadian economics, I pointed out that this trade had been going on for nearly two centuries, starting with the fur trade. You responded that Canada also traded with countries in Europe - as though this somehow meant the trade between the US & Canada did not exist. I posted links which historically documented US / Canada fur trade - you...well at this point I don't know what your point was anymore.
I then speculated with another poster that the real issue was as he suggested - that (many) Canadians suffer from collective a identity / esteem crisis – and that the behavior I was speaking of was fascinating given the level of obsession Canadians (on the whole) have with American culture, etc., even going so far as to attend American universities on a far more frequent basis than the converse, despite American universities being more expensive. You countered this with something on American secondary schools and learning about fur trade - again, what this had to do with my point, I don't know.
Let start over - clearly you got lost somewhere. Without saying that your ORGINAL POST missed the mark (I never said it did), I think Canadians should be a bit less obnoxious with their criticism and judgments of the US, given that they benefit directly from the polices and collective international behavior of the country they are directing their criticisms toward.
Your turn. I didn’t swear once, so maybe you won’t be distracted by my “diversions” and can actually formulate an intelligent counter argument.