Who do you attract the most?

[shack]

I was called anti-semitic, by someone like you, who said there was no apartheid in South Africa and cheered on genocide of the Palestinians. It isn't much of an accusation coming from you, Mr. Apartheid.

There have been dozens besides me who have said that you're an anti-Semite. Open your eyes.

And I am going to assume that they are, and give someone the benefit of the doubt that they are infact innocent, if there is no precedent.

Good for you. That does not mean that anybody else has to assume he's innocent.

So then you should have no issues taking back your previous statement, that a person acquitted after a trial, may not necessarily be innocent.

There is nothing to take back. That is the reality of the situation. You either refuse to accept that reality or are not intelligent enough to understand it. Feel free to choose whichever one you like.

There is no requirement for benefit of the doubt, according to you, since said doubt has been put to rest by the courts decision by finding the person not guilty.

???? are you talking about. Find the quote where I said "doubt has been put to rest by the courts"? You have serious comprehension issues if you think that is what I said.

See? Yet another example of you pretzeling yourself, in an attempt to use "logic", in which you clearly fail, every single time. Including that time at the UofT, when you took the course.

Once again, my position has been clear and consistent. You are the one twisting things around and making your own interpretations of what I said. On what basis do you claim that I failed my course. You sound idiotic as well as jealous. The only point that I needed to make is that I know more on the topic of logic based on having taken even 1 course on the topic. I've had some formal training on the topic. I proved that point and all you can pull out of your ass is that I lied. A classic tactic when someone has no facts and has lost the argument. Please tell us, what formal training do you have in the topic of logic?

Thank you for acknowledging I am super smart and kick your butt every single time, in an argument. But truth be told, your "logic" or lack thereof, isn't hard to counter.

I don't have to acknowledge anything. You have proven how confused you are to everyone else who you are disagreeing with. Claiming that you are super-smart clearly means that you know that you are anything butt.

The only question is, did I say there is a legal obligation for YOU to give someone the benefit of the doubt once acquitted?

No, you said that everybody must give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he was innocent as he was not found guilty. That's why others responded to your incorrect assumption. I hadn't even entered into the discussion yet.

I will not respond any further.

 

[barnacler]

GETTING BACK ON TOPIC...


What I realized awhile back is that a lot of men are jerks.

Out of shape, all they do is watch sports all the time, drink beer, don't and know the first thing about how to dress, and have no idea whatsoever how to make enjoyable, interesting conversation. They talk loud and stupid. And whose idea of seeing the world is an all-inclusive somewhere in the Caribbean or a cruise.

So.....

If you get in shape, drink wine and cocktails, dress somewhat smart and a little bit DIFFERENT, talk to a person intelligently and show a genuine interest in THEM, travel, and overall have self-confidence, all sorts of women will be attracted to you.

I have for years as a younger man had a great interest in women in their 50's and 60's.

I guarantee you their are women also interested in men 20 years older. No, they are not the 10s, but they are still solid 6's, which I personally really like.

Anyhow, with regards to the original question, women in their 40s who now KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are with an idiot loser or have a history with one I find are interested in me.

 

[Vera.Reis]

So.....

If you get in shape, drink wine and cocktails, dress somewhat smart and a little bit DIFFERENT, talk to a person intelligently and show a genuine interest in THEM, travel, and overall have self-confidence, all sorts of women will be attracted to you.

I have for years as a younger man had a great interest in women in their 50's and 60's.

I guarantee you their are women also interested in men 20 years older. No, they are not the 10s, but they are still solid 6's, which I personally really like.

Anyhow, with regards to the original question, women in their 40s who now KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are with an idiot loser or have a history with one I find are interested in me.

I had to go into your post history because I feel very called out by this description as it matches my partner well

But besides you not liking fake boobs, there are some indicators that you are older than my bf as well, but I was like

I definitely agree that a man trying to show some sophistication goes a long way, especially with women 30+

 

[xix]

Why are people afraid of being themselves?

Attraction is a very complicating trait. I am sure we all have our share of stories.

I prefer to attract someone who is not a S.E.E.N = Selfish, entitled, Egotistic, Narcissist inside their head.

 

[LC18]

GETTING BACK ON TOPIC...

Thank you for that.

It’s unfortunate to see that the same people come to my threads to argue over and over. They could literally just create their own and call it “Let’s argue!”

 

[LC18]

Anyhow, with regards to the original question, women in their 40s who now KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are with an idiot loser or have a history with one I find are interested in me.

Unhappy suburban moms?

 

[dchoye]

Topic derailed again.
Come to read who I attract the most only to discover who in TERB attracts me to argue the most

 

[Vera.Reis]

Thank you for that.

It’s unfortunate to see that the same people come to my threads to argue over and over. They could literally just create their own and call it “Let’s argue!”

I mean, that is the nature of conversation is it not? I've never had a conversation where one topic did not lead to another, that is generally how conversations evolve. Maybe create one of those threads about specific types of photos, or a trivial thread, if you do not want conversations to naturally evolve.

And isn't discussing threads being derailed, also derailing the thread? It does not pertain to the topic at hand, and is clearly now leading to the conversation evolving in a different direction.

 

[Vera.Reis]

In the spirit of laughs, I clearly attract assholes on TERB who just want to argue, and I take the bait because I'm bored =)

 

[carvesg]

I mean, that is the nature of conversation is it not? I've never had a conversation where one topic did not lead to another, that is generally how conversations evolve. Maybe create one of those threads about specific types of photos, or a trivial thread, if you do not want conversations to naturally evolve.

And isn't discussing threads being derailed, also derailing the thread? It does not pertain to the topic at hand, and is clearly now leading to the conversation evolving in a different direction.

It depends on the board you are on can you divert from the thread subject for that long .

Many boards have moderation teams that jump in either to warn , delete comments (pruning) , remind people, suspend accounts or even ban people.

 

[NotADcotor]

In the spirit of laughs, I clearly attract assholes on TERB who just want to argue, and I take the bait because I'm bored =)

They say you attract what you put out