The problem with the term "White Privilege" is that someone is always trying to weaponize it and shame or beat someone down with it where it conveniently serves to champion current racial narratives and debates. A human being is not, " White Privilege "
White privilege is not a person! White Privilege is a cultural stigma born out of cultural evolution in which racism played its part, unfortunately, people keep dragging the white privilege weapon back and forth across the debate line to leverage their narratives.
I never sat down in a job interview and thought to myself, I hope my white privilege gets me this job! Could it play a role in getting me that job? Yes, does that make me "GUILTY" of white privilege? No. Does it mean I benefited from white privilege? Yes
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of white privilege? No.
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of being a racist? No.
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of racism? No.
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of anything? No.
Should society make a white baby born yesterday feel guilt and shame for anything? No.
So, if we can concede that a newborn is absolved from the guilt of all the social stigmas fueling the fires around the world, my question is this.
When does the extreme rights blood lust get to pull the White Privilege branding iron out of the fire and press it into infant flesh? 1 month, 6 months, a year, two years, 5 years? When does the branding suit the white guilt narrative? When does it satisfy the existing cry for racial social justice? If not an infant, Who? Who is guilty and deserving the brand? what age? what sex? What are the criteria for branding the dragon?
I don’t accept white privilege as my cross to bear anymore than I accept blame for the unfortunate conditions for women in Afghanistan.
White privilege is not a person! White Privilege is a cultural stigma born out of cultural evolution in which racism played its part, unfortunately, people keep dragging the white privilege weapon back and forth across the debate line to leverage their narratives.
I never sat down in a job interview and thought to myself, I hope my white privilege gets me this job! Could it play a role in getting me that job? Yes, does that make me "GUILTY" of white privilege? No. Does it mean I benefited from white privilege? Yes
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of white privilege? No.
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of being a racist? No.
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of racism? No.
Is a white baby born yesterday "GUILTY" of anything? No.
Should society make a white baby born yesterday feel guilt and shame for anything? No.
So, if we can concede that a newborn is absolved from the guilt of all the social stigmas fueling the fires around the world, my question is this.
When does the extreme rights blood lust get to pull the White Privilege branding iron out of the fire and press it into infant flesh? 1 month, 6 months, a year, two years, 5 years? When does the branding suit the white guilt narrative? When does it satisfy the existing cry for racial social justice? If not an infant, Who? Who is guilty and deserving the brand? what age? what sex? What are the criteria for branding the dragon?
I don’t accept white privilege as my cross to bear anymore than I accept blame for the unfortunate conditions for women in Afghanistan.