Is the very best you can do is Ad Hominem? Oh right, I forgot, That's the very best you can do so you pass it off as deep thinking.
This is your sketchy Twitter page guy. He claims to be a "reformed" ex BLM activist. And he posts the usual shit about Trump being amazing and women being out of control and needing to be made housewives again.
Can't you people find Twitter pages which aren't obvious grifts?!
But it's not "ad hominem", is it? It's not as though I'm commenting about the guy's haircut or tie selection.Is the very best you can do is Ad Hominem? Oh right, I forgot, That's the very best you can do so you pass it off as deep thinking.
It's your problem that you look down and degrade those that want to be SAHMs. It's their choice and they shouldn't be belittled for it by guys like you.
Not nearly as good as these guys when they went to join in a civil war reenactment.
Thanks for sharing his twitter. He's obviously an intelligent fellow.
This is your sketchy Twitter page guy. He claims to be a "reformed" ex BLM activist.
I think you have a firm grasp on the Machiavellian nature of that poster.....Is the very best you can do is Ad Hominem? Oh right, I forgot, That's the very best you can do so you pass it off as deep thinking.
It's your problem that you look down and degrade those that want to be SAHMs. It's their choice and they shouldn't be belittled for it by guys like you.
View attachment 211121
I said all of that?! And I was wrong 5 times in 7 years?! What about all the times that I was right?Recall that this is mandrill's history in a nutshell:
-said Colin Kap was going to play football again
-said Trump would never win the presidency
-said Johnny Depp would lose his court case against Amber Heard
-said Twitter would crash and burn within weeks of firing 80% of its useless staff
-said the Oakville trans teacher was actually an alt-right dude pretending to be trans
That's just a few of the gems this supposed lawyer has provided. He's batting around 0 for 100.
Wow,But it's not "ad hominem", is it? It's not as though I'm commenting about the guy's haircut or tie selection.
Assuming this guy is actually real and exists - which is a genuine question about troll Twitter accounts on both sides - then he's simply part of an ecosystem where 100's of similar accounts essentially repeat and repost each other's memes, quotes and conspiracy theories. So they have zero cred. I mean, it's not as though this guy is a top reporter for the NYT, is it? He's a cheap, sketchy schmuck with a Twitter page.
I doubt that those photos of white people pretending to be slaves are real. I suspect they're probably righties playing dress up. And if they're not, then they're some wacko fringe group that's doing it's own thing when the rest of the world simply goes about being sane.
I realize that the challenge to pwn the libtards is a difficult one, but try harder.
Exactly. Of course it is. How ironic.You forgot one.
Posting this image is evidence of white fragility.
That doesn't look like a sustainable model. With a larger % of the population retired or retiring, who's going to pay for the social services?There is a serious population decline in no-immigration Japan. 560,000 net loss in 2022. 127 million people in 2014 and projected to go down to 97 million by 2050. Meanwhile the population is aging rapidly with 25.9% of people aged 65 or older. Taxes, already high, would have to increase significantly for workers to support the aged. Sales of adult diapers surpassed sales of baby diapers for the first time in history. Japan for the dying Japanese. Hooraaaay![]()
Aging of Japan - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Not so sure about white adjacent, but I am glad "Asian" isn't an ethnicity that only includes people of "oriental" origins. What about Israelis? What about Arabs? What about Pakistanis, Afghans, Indians and everyone else who doesn't share those oriental phenotypes who are all Asians?
Don't be silly.Not so sure about white adjacent, but I am glad "Asian" isn't an ethnicity that only includes people of "oriental" origins. What about Israelis? What about Arabs? What about Pakistanis, Afghans, Indians and everyone else who doesn't share those oriental phenotypes who are all Asians?
I do think that all immigration applications should stop asking for race. You have the person's photo, fingerprints and country of origin and address. What the heck do you need them to define their race for? Same applies for sexual orientation. Why does the govt need to know who you like to fuck? lol.
Yes my point is don't use the word "Asian" to only refer to people of "oriental" origins. Asians are people from Asia, so use the terms as laid out by...for example the Statscan classification which is more accurate. My reference to Israelis and Arabs etc was to say that those people are from countries that are also in Asia which would also make them "Asian".Don't be silly.
Israelis are a nationality, a country. Similar to Canadians. They are NOT an ethnicity or a race. SUPRISINGLY, Israel is composed of very many racial/ethnic groups. You really need to do better.
Arabs - they live in the Middle East and thus are Middle Eastern or simply Arabic which 'could' be an ethnicity/race. Just so you know, if you're from Iran, you are NOT an Arab. You're Persian. Know the difference.
As for Afghans, Indians etc.., the "be kind" folks just lump them with Asians because they are lazy. The smart ones call them "South Asians".
StatsCan classifications because definitions matter.
In accordance with Employment Equity Act guidelines, the visible minority groups South Asian, Chinese, Black, Filipino, Arab, Latin American, Southeast Asian, West Asian, Korean and Japanese include people who reported either a single mark-in response corresponding to these groups or provided a write-in response corresponding to these groups. For example, the category “South Asian” includes people who provided a single mark-in response of “South Asian” or provided a write-in response such as “Bangladeshi,” “Indian (India),” “Pakistani,” “Punjabi” or “Sri Lankan.”
However, much like the 'yellow' Asians, the 'brown' Asians will very very soon be very very soon considered "white adjacent" because they are proving to be very successful & accomplished. Those that believe in "White Supremacy" can't have Visible Minorities succeed right?
And now you live on it. Leave, give it back to the natives, or STFU.And their lands were stolen and given to whites.