"We Love Muslims"
- Thread starter SkyRider
- Start date
Hahaha! True to a degree.
But I'll be happy if he becomes the Republican nominee just to see him and Shillary duke it out!
Trump is a dangerous wildcard but I would never in life cast a vote for power hungry corporate shill Hillary either.
I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. My exposure (when I was a young child) to Sikhs began with stories from Canadian WW I and WW II veterans about the loyalty and gallantry of Sikh soldiers. (BTW: I am not Sikh myself.)
The West did reconquered North Africa, the Middle East, present day Pakistan and Malaya in the 19th and 20th century.
It certainly doesn't disqualify him. Most American presidents in the modern era have been dodge drafters. Clinton et al.
I would expect Facebook fits in nicely with the social standards of most Islamic countries... after all, it's a site where nipples are banned, but beheadings are A-Okay!
'Trump wants to crack down on illegal immigration and keep the scumbag type mexicans out of the US' which according to Trumps own words are all of them.Trump wants to crack down on illegal immigration and keep the scumbag type mexicans out of the US, many of whom who are in murican prisons. Wasn't aware islam was a race, thanks for enlightening us, and why are only white people racist?
Yes, good point Trump could be better described as a bigot in his attitude against Muslims since he cdoesn't care where they originated. His racist comments are better left to these choice quotes:
“Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”
“Laziness is a trait in blacks.”
If you look at the typical white trash cesspool of bigot and racist misinformation born out of hatred - Trump is there wallowing in it. Crowds of Muslims cheering 9/11 in NJ - never happened. Recently Trump claimed blacks were responsible in 81% of homicides with white victims, the FBI stats show that whites were killed by whites 82% of the time. Typical - Trump is a voice for the white trash rural areas of the US. He is upset he wasn't chosen Man of the Year ... what an arrogant pinhead.
There is no doubt they do already. To make it a law and talk about it in the public media is all a facade to dupe people into thinking the government doesn't know anything. lol
Zuck's a fucking creepy sleazy hypocritical douchebag.
He talks about a better world for all people (since he had his retarded baby now), he speaks like a know it all, a pretentious one at that. Yet all he did, was steal an idea, knew how to code it and now he's some brilliant guy?
Regardless, if he loves Muslims like he claims, he would have taken down the "draw Mohammad day" group on facebook years ago, but he didn't.
He knew the ramifications and the outrage it would cause, but nope, he let it go on. Pakistan had blocked facebook so nobody in Pakistan had access to it.
The guy is the biggest piece of shit on earth, period.
http://wallblog.co.uk/2010/05/20/pakistan-blocks-facebook-over-everybody-draw-mohammed-day/
Which is even more reprehensible. Hire people from your own country first. He's fucking his own countrymen first, much like apple, dell, hp and microsoft have done over the years.
Nice patriotism.
$ > love of country and its citizens
You sound like a Trump supporter. Hiring Americans first is one of his policies.
I'd never support a candidate as stupid and arrogant as him. His other policy of blocking all Muslims from entering a huge country also shows how simplistic his problem solving skills are to (what is) a very complex problem.
Trump: You Should Ban Islamists, Not Muslims
http://www.danielpipes.org/16331/trump-ban-islamists-not-muslims
Donald Trump, the leading Republican presidential candidate, called on Dec. 7 for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on." Replace one word in this formulation and it goes from outrageous to brilliant.
Reacting to massacres by Muslims in Paris and San Bernardino, Trump pointed to a Muslim hatred "beyond comprehension" for the West. Therefore, he concluded, "Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad."
The negative responses, domestic and international, Muslim and non-Muslim, came in fast and furious – and rightly so, as Trump's crude blast is unconstitutional, unacceptable, unworkable, and unstrategic.
Unconstitutional: Every Western basic law is secular, disallowing a religious test for immigration, rendering Trump's statement less an exercise in practical policy making than a gadfly provocation.
Unacceptable: Beyond legalities, secularism represents a Western core value, up there with freedom of speech, a value hardly anyone accepts gutting for reasons of momentary expediency.
Unworkable: Islam is not a permanent identity like skin color. Nothing prevents Muslims from renouncing Islam or converting to another religion. Unless Trump extends his "total and complete shutdown" to former Muslims – which is even more unconstitutional – he just encourages the already-existing phenomenon of Muslim conversions of convenience (as symbolized by a church in Berlin).
Unstrategic: Trump's presidential campaign once again is counterproductive; he simultaneously makes conservatives look like idiots and brings adoring attention to those who oppose his views, in this case radical Muslim groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (widely known as CAIR), which has enjoyed an unprecedented cornucopia of media coverage to spread its deceitful message.
That said, Trump has raised a critical and urgent issue that all Westerners must face, as symbolized by the recent tsunami of illegal immigration to Europe and the huge strains it has created. Simply put, Muslims present a disproportionately large source of problems, as becomes clear when they are compared with Hindu immigrants, who are roughly the same in number but generally fit quietly into the West.
Violence is the headline topic relating to Muslims, whether large-scale plots (Paris) or sudden jihad syndrome lone wolves (San Bernardino), but violence is hardly the whole problem. Muslim hostility toward non-Muslims takes many other forms, such as teaching Islamic supremacism in mosques, spewing antisemitism in the streets, and threatening anyone who dares publicly to criticize Islam. Issues concerning women include female genital mutilation, honor killings, polygyny, and forced marriages. Islamic mores lead to strong antipathies against seeing-eye dogs, mixed swimming pool usage, and homosexuals.
Polls show widespread – and legitimate – concern about these issues as well as growing impatience with governmental dismissal of those concerns. When Germany's Angela Merkel welcomes an unlimited number of illegal immigrants or Barack Obama ridicules concerns about Syrian immigrants, populist voices like that of Donald Trump inevitably find followers.
Indeed, he is just the latest anti-immigrant figure to find a message that increasingly resonates. Geert Wilders' PVV in the Netherlands wins 39 out of 150 seats in parliament in a recent survey, up from his current 15 and almost twice that of any other party. In the French regional elections a week ago, Marine le Pen's National Front led in 6 out of 13 districts. This upward trend will continue until one of these ostracized insurgent parties gains over 50 percent of the vote and enters office. In this sense, Trump stands at the cutting edge.
How to deal with Muslim immigration in a responsible and uncontroversial manner? I offer two suggestions. First, replace the "Muslims entering the United States" in Trump's formulation with "Islamists entering the United States." Islamists are those Muslims who seek to apply Islamic law, oppress women and non-Muslims, and establish a worldwide caliphate. They make up about 10-15 percent of the Muslim population; they, not Muslims in general, are the barbarians who "believe only in Jihad."
Second, engage in serious research into all would-be visitors and immigrants, not the pro-forma review that prevails these days. Doing so requires money and time, as well as creative inquiries to smoke out ideological proclivities, but each person entering the country must be checked to make sure no Islamists are allowed in, ever, at all, even for brief visits, thereby increasing our common security.
So true. Muslims are the most different, and often violent, ethnic group of the many ethnic groups that make up the Canadian population. Unlike these other ethnic groups (e.g. Chinese, Koreans, Tamils, E.I., Jews, Sikhs, Filipinos, Latinos, Europeans of course, etc.), Muslims are the least, by far, to adopt secular values. Muslims also have the highest crime rate by far of any religious group (Sikhs and Jews have the lowest).
Ever notice (except for Malaya), Muslim countries are almost 100% Muslims. Ever notice that Muslims cause problems in virtually every country where they are a minority.
So which one is it? Is 'Muslim' an ethnic group, or a religious group?
If I choose to convert and become a Muslim, have I just changed my ethnicity?
