USSC strikes down Roe v Wade

Uncharted

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2013
1,046
1,013
113
Hopefully this decimates the Repugs in 2022 as it should galvanize the Dems base, especially voting women. Hmmmm, how are the GOP going to stop women from voting????
It won't do anything. They still won't be able to change this. Supreme court judges are for life. And the bench is full. There are currently more right leaning Judges than Left. So unless the Democrats plan to start killing supreme court judges. This ruling will likely stand for a while.

Which again, just puts the states in the same legal position as Canada when it comes to abortion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnd5050

johnd5050

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2012
2,756
3,488
113
Hopefully this decimates the Repugs in 2022 as it should galvanize the Dems base, especially voting women. Hmmmm, how are the GOP going to stop women from voting????
In a banana republic they will find a way.
Remove all ballot boxes
Close half of the voting locations.
Delete the names of registered voters
etc, etc
 

Claudia Love

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
2,582
1,924
113
You know what this means right ? women will be in underground abortion clinics and lots will die without proper facilities ......thats what happened before and it will happen again
 

johnd5050

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2012
2,756
3,488
113
You know what this means right ? women will be in underground abortion clinics and lots will die without proper facilities ......thats what happened before and it will happen again
If women can afford to travel, they will come to Canada or go overseas to take care of business.
Men making such decisions for women is pathetic.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,467
87,884
113
It won't do anything. They still won't be able to change this. Supreme court judges are for life. And the bench is full. There are currently more right leaning Judges than Left. So unless the Democrats plan to start killing supreme court judges. This ruling will likely stand for a while.

Which again, just puts the states in the same legal position as Canada when it comes to abortion.
No, it doesn't. Canada had its own Roe v Wade in the 1980's called Morgentaler.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,467
87,884
113
It won't do anything. They still won't be able to change this. Supreme court judges are for life. And the bench is full. There are currently more right leaning Judges than Left. So unless the Democrats plan to start killing supreme court judges. This ruling will likely stand for a while.

Which again, just puts the states in the same legal position as Canada when it comes to abortion.
I think that the right wing majority is probably impeachable for abruptly breaking with precedent. But you need a 2/3 majority in the senate to do that.
 

johnd5050

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2012
2,756
3,488
113

Thomas writes that gay marriage, gay sex and contraception are going to lose their constitutional protection as soon as they get to the USSC.

JC better stay away from ladyboys when he goes back to the USA is all I can say. Sex is going to essentially be outlawed in every red state within the next 5 years. The only person you'll be allowed to fuck is your wife and the only time you'll be allowed to fuck her is to make babies. No blowjobs. No anal.

Americans are going to end up in jail for looking at porn videos.
Agree with you, one thing you forgot to mention.
Men will require a permit to copulate with their wife or SO.
BJ and Anal will cost extra $$
 

Uncharted

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2013
1,046
1,013
113
In a banana republic they will find a way.
Remove all ballot boxes
Close half of the voting locations.
Delete the names of registered voters
etc, etc
This isn't where they should be concentrating their voting. All this ruling has done is left it up to the individual States to make their own decisions.
So the people should be voting at their State political level. If enough people want abortion rights in their State then they will vote in a Governor that will make it happen. If they don't, then they won't.

This has been the case in Canada since 1988. There is nothing here to prevent the Provinces from making abortion provincially illegal. The fact that it hasn't happened just shows that the majority of Canadians in all provinces are just fine with the status quo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnd5050

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
39,991
7,412
113
The great State of Missouri has just signed into law a "Rights of the Unborn Child Act" banning abortion outright. This is the same state who's Governor enjoyed torturing women. He had to step down to avoid public scandal, yet the Sadist/Sodomite is running for the Senate under the MAGA emblem.

 
  • Angry
Reactions: Claudia Love

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,717
15,267
113
That's a discussion you need to have with her, not me.

Listen to the woman. It's her right to choose. Always!
You posted a nutbag to try and show why the Republicans and their Supreme court are right so go ahead, prove it has been legal to abort a child after born or even close to being born, go ahead, I'm waiting.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mr.Know-It-All

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,498
4,697
113
This isn't where they should be concentrating their voting. All this ruling has done is left it up to the individual States to make their own decisions.
So the people should be voting at their State political level. If enough people want abortion rights in their State then they will vote in a Governor that will make it happen. If they don't, then they won't.

This has been the case in Canada since 1988. There is nothing here to prevent the Provinces from making abortion provincially illegal. The fact that it hasn't happened just shows that the majority of Canadians in all provinces are just fine with the status quo.
There is a SCC ruling basically that says any law put in place will be over turned. It is considered a medical preceedure with no moral argument that can put a law in place. Thats why they wont.
The USA Court has decided to allow states to do it.

Thats the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Uncharted

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2013
1,046
1,013
113
No, it doesn't. Canada had its own Roe v Wade in the 1980's called Morgentaler.
There is a SCC ruling basically that says any law put in place will be over turned. It is considered a medical preceedure with no moral argument that can put a law in place. Thats why they wont.
The USA Court has decided to allow states to do it.

Thats the difference.
1988 to be exact. Which only served to decriminalize it. There is nothing in Canadian law that enshrines the right to abortion in the Charter of rights.
And although the Provinces can't make it a criminal offense to perform or have an abortion, they can make it illegal and unable to be performed in many other ways.
This is why Justin is now looking at strengthening the Canadian Healthcare act so that it forces the provinces to comply with equality of access to Abortions. Which they have not had to do for the last 34 years.
 
Last edited:

johnd5050

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2012
2,756
3,488
113
This isn't where they should be concentrating their voting. All this ruling has done is left it up to the individual States to make their own decisions.
So the people should be voting at their State political level. If enough people want abortion rights in their State then they will vote in a Governor that will make it happen. If they don't, then they won't.

This has been the case in Canada since 1988. There is nothing here to prevent the Provinces from making abortion provincially illegal. The fact that it hasn't happened just shows that the majority of Canadians in all provinces are just fine with the status quo.
You are 100% correct.
With mid term elections round the corner, the states will do nothing, the governors will do nothing.
If they do, they will be labeled as outcasts like a couple of Republicans in the committee investigating the Jan 6th riots.
DJT will be the first one to throw a rock.
 

Claudia Love

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
2,582
1,924
113
1988 to be exact. Which only served to decriminalize it. There is nothing in Canadian law that enshrines the right to abortion in the Charter of rights.
And although the Provinces can't make it a criminal offense to perform or have an abortion, they can make it illegal and unable to be performed in many other ways.
This is why Justin is now looking at strengthening the Canadian Healthcare act so that Abortions are specifically protected in that act. But as of right now, and for the last 34 years, it has not been.
Doug Ford has already dipped his fingers into abortions he's decreasing the numbers allowed.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
39,991
7,412
113
Eric Greitens (above) is a retired Navy Seal. If not properly reintegrated, there's no guarantee that they will be well adjusted once they return into society. Gene Hackman told his story of spending five years in psychotherapy after he retired from the Marines.

Thanks for the beer.

 

Uncharted

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2013
1,046
1,013
113
Doug Ford has already dipped his fingers into abortions he's decreasing the numbers allowed.
Considering these came with other cuts to other programs in these same specific hospitals, this is likely more the result of overall healthcare cuts than an attack specifically on abortion.
But you believe what ever you want to believe.
 
Toronto Escorts