USSC strikes down Roe v Wade
- Thread starter Darts
- Start date
It would have seemed more fair if Pelosi worked out a compromise with McCarthy on Republican choices.
Cheney and Kinzinger are Republicans who are Trump critics and were likely not going to be re-elected. Their re-election problems can't all be attributed to Trump.
Oddly, both Cheney and KInzinger also seem to have an affinity for using American military force. That might be incidental to all this, but Butler1000 usually has interesting insights into these issues.
Last edited:
Thanks for posting the article that shows that all those who worked with Hutchinson trust her testimony. Of course that pisses off Brietbart and Fox.Usually they say they're leaving chief anchor job for a streaming service to spend more time with.their families, but this also works. ROTFLMFAO!!!
Oh just for you, enjoy. Lol
Never Trumpers, Ex-Staffers Fall for Cassidy Hutchinson's Testimony
Never Trumpers and disgruntled former White House staffers fell hard for Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony on Capitol Hill Tuesday.www.breitbart.com
Hutchinson testified under oath. Ornato can do so as well.
A person offering false testimony fully deserves the worst. We usually jail those who lie under oath. I will happily switch to another name, if you can come up with something equally descriptive. Sorry, "bitch" just doesn't cut it. People who lie under oath are the lowest of the low- lower than whale shit on the bottom of the ocean.
I think basic logic is that Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony is hearsay. I don't think its a stretch to say when stories and accounts are told,and retold they are dramatized and embellished.
We don't know if Cassidy Hutchinson was told a dramatized version of events. The Committee should not even be speaking with her about what happened in the car. That's not her fault.
SPIN us another conspiracy theory, Rachel. Maybe something from the Alfa Bank file. ROTFLMFAO!
Yeahhh...........but it seems to be normal convention to reserve "asshole" for men.
Hell, even anal connoisseurs say they fucked someone in the ass and leave the word "asshole" strictly as a pejorative.
You are correct in blaming the commission for allowing her to pass on what is hearsay.
But you should not say she lied, unless you know for sure she was not told what she passed on.
Only the story told to her by Ornato about rump grabbing the wheel of the Beast was hearsay.
The rest is first hand, eye witness testimony she directly witnessed.
Cheney is so much in the shitter she is now reaching out to registered Democrats in the state to switch and vote for her.
She is her father's daughter in politics. Nuff said.
Kinzinger is a hawkish former military pilot. I think their support for military intervention is incidental to their opposition to Trump. Still, it's kind of bizarre and inappropriate for Pelosi to bypass protocol and install two lame duck Republican opponents of Trump on the committee.
I think you are exaggerating to make your point. You should try to avoid this even if it's your thing.
You're pretty emotional this morning, JC. Things not going well?
I was teasing your attempt to label people and diminish differing viewpoints as exampled by "palingenetic ultranationalism tied strongly to racial themes and a normalization of violence as a political tool". Of course, saying someone is "woke" is an example of that. However, I don't think Biden's election was a movement of the "woke". That just gives too much credit to so called movements of the left and right.
Having read your posts on MERB for several years, that phrase confirms your affinity for academic political science. I myself think it's hard to stand back, be objective and look at a narrow window of time. I also think academia can be described as generally more liberal and certainly mostly opposed to the Trump phenomenon and Trump voters.
In my opinion, the Trump phenomenon could be described first and foremost as a voter rejection of traditional politics and more likely a distaste for Hillary. I think this is more likely what history will take away from 2016.
Too much was made of the MAGA slogan. All political campaign slogans have quite a bit of puffery. Only hardcore progressives should be offended because it is clearly takes aim at their views. As far as "palingenetic ultranationalists", I'm sure there are some in the bunch.
No, that was an accurate statement.
Every other important bit of evidence that was reported was reported as eye witness testimony.
Feel free to do some actual research and check it for yourself.
Its not hard.
Just not at the "hearing" itself, right? And with no cross examination of the other side's witnesses, right?
