U.S. Mid-terms

BTW you lefties have some catching up to do. There have been a total of 19 Republican presidents and only 14 Dummycrats.
That means you have to win the next 5 elections just to break even :D


So the score is 19 to 14. Better get to work



REPUBLICANS 19
DEMOCRATS 14
You must live a pretty pathetic life when you’re boasting about Republican vs Democrat presidents online…
 
You must live a pretty pathetic life when you’re boasting about Republican vs Democrat presidents online…

Give phil a break, it must be so hard to find some angle that lets you think you're a rump supporter and a winner these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar
You must live a pretty pathetic life when you’re boasting about Republican vs Democrat presidents online…
Triggered?? :D
 
BTW you lefties have some catching up to do. There have been a total of 19 Republican presidents and only 14 Dummycrats.
That means you have to win the next 5 elections just to break even :D


So the score is 19 to 14. Better get to work



REPUBLICANS 19
DEMOCRATS 14

Why are you stuck in the last few centuries. Be realistic, when a President like Biden smashed all trends to be the first one in decades to do so well in the Mid Terms in spite of the high inflation, then it is a slap in the face of Trump and his cronies who constantly blamed him for it!!

The Democrats have kept control of the Senate, due to the lies of the Repugnantlicans. An achievement despite the polls giving fuel to the likes of Fox News who were constantly blah blahing about how the Repugnantlicans will win the House by a margin of 40 or so seats, and also take the Senate!! 🤣 😂
 
Why are you stuck in the last few centuries. Be realistic, when a President like Biden smashed all trends to be the first one in decades to do so well in the Mid Terms in spite of the high inflation, then it is a slap in the face of Trump and his cronies who constantly blamed him for it!!

The Democrats have kept control of the Senate, due to the lies of the Repugnantlicans. An achievement despite the polls giving fuel to the likes of Fox News who were constantly blah blahing about how the Repugnantlicans will win the House by a margin of 40 or so seats, and also take the Senate!! 🤣 😂
REPUBLICANS 19
DEMOCRATS
14
 
You must live a pretty pathetic life when you’re boasting about Republican vs Democrat presidents online…

Boasting about it does seem pretty pathetic - but looking over the history and how things evolved and played out can be interesting.

For instance, we have 19 Republican Presidents.
We have 17 Democratic ones (not sure why his article says 14).

Then we have 4 more from the "Democratic-Republicans", which brings up the argument of whether or not you should consider them the Democrats or not. (The D-Rs split up and the majority continued using just the name Democratic, so it kind of depends.)

But then you have the discussion about how long someone served? Should we count the number of times the US has elected a Republican or Democrat? R 23 / D 23 (not including any "Democratic-Republicans)
(Then you have cases of the "National Union" party, which only existed for the civil war election so what do you do there?)

Should we count how many years a Republican or Democrat has served as President? (Probably too much of a hassle to count, but it looks like Rs for a little over 90 and Dems a little over 100.)


Of course, given that this whole time period encompasses the third through sixth party systems it doesn't even tell you much about the parties themselves.
 
Last edited:
BTW you lefties have some catching up to do. There have been a total of 19 Republican presidents and only 14 Dummycrats.
That means you have to win the next 5 elections just to break even :D


So the score is 19 to 14. Better get to work



REPUBLICANS 19
DEMOCRATS 14
Of all your idiotic hot takes, this one might be the best....

So, a little history for someone who likely has not read much about US history. You may not be aware, but the republican's and democrats switched sides in the late 1950s/early 1960s. The Party of Lincoln that freed the slaves became the party that fought tooth and nail to stop the civil rights movement....while the Democratic party, which did at one point help launch the Klan and push Jim Crow Laws....went the other way. It is a really well known shift in their political philosophies...one that the GOP does not like to publicize...


So, does the above mentioned thing still hold weight? It doesn't really. But I know you need to latch your small-minded ideas to something, and if this is the thing that makes you feel special...go for it....
 
Schumer nails it

Schumer explains three reasons Dems avoided 'red wave'



I wonder if Pee Pee is thinking, Hmmmmm, I should move closer to the center before Justin wipes the floor with me
 
Boasting about it does seem pretty pathetic - but looking over the history and how things evolved and played out can be interesting.

For instance, we have 19 Republican Presidents.
We have 17 Democratic ones (not sure why his article says 14).

Then we have 4 more from the "Democratic-Republicans", which brings up the argument of whether or not you should consider them the Democrats or not. (The D-Rs split up and the majority continued using just the name Democratic, so it kind of depends.)

But then you have the discussion about how long someone served? Should we count the number of times the US has elected a Republican or Democrat? R 23 / D 23 (not including any "Democratic-Republicans)
(Then you have cases of the "National Union" party, which only existed for the civil war election so what do you do there?)

Should we count how many years a Republican or Democrat has served as President? (Probably too much of a hassle to count, but it looks like Rs for a little over 90 and Dems a little over 100.)


Of course, given that this whole time period encompasses the third through sixth party systems it doesn't even tell you much about the parties themselves.

That's too hard for phil.
He can't figure out which house is which already, as we saw with the Pelosi threads.
 
Of all your idiotic hot takes, this one might be the best....

So, a little history for someone who likely has not read much about US history. You may not be aware, but the republican's and democrats switched sides in the late 1950s/early 1960s. The Party of Lincoln that freed the slaves became the party that fought tooth and nail to stop the civil rights movement....while the Democratic party, which did at one point help launch the Klan and push Jim Crow Laws....went the other way. It is a really well known shift in their political philosophies...one that the GOP does not like to publicize...


So, does the above mentioned thing still hold weight? It doesn't really. But I know you need to latch your small-minded ideas to something, and if this is the thing that makes you feel special...go for it....
REPUBLICANS 19
DEMOCRATS
14
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

No, it isn't.
They got the 19 right, but look:

You can count them yourself.

7 Andrew Jackson S.C. Democratic 1829–37
8 Martin Van Buren N.Y. Democratic 1837–41
11 James K. Polk N.C. Democratic 1845–49
14 Franklin Pierce N.H. Democratic 1853–57
15 James Buchanan Pa. Democratic 1857–61
17 Andrew Johnson N.C. Democratic (Union) 1865–69
22/24 Grover Cleveland N.J. Democratic 1885–89
28 Woodrow Wilson Va. Democratic 1913–21
32 Franklin D. Roosevelt N.Y. Democratic 1933–45*
33 Harry S. Truman Mo. Democratic 1945–53
35 John F. Kennedy Mass. Democratic 1961–63*
36 Lyndon B. Johnson Texas Democratic 1963–69
39 Jimmy Carter Ga. Democratic 1977–81
42 Bill Clinton Ark. Democratic 1993–2001
44 Barack Obama Hawaii Democratic 2009–17
46 Joe Biden Pa. Democratic 2021–

That's 16. (I forgot before that Grover Cleveland gets elected twice so it can be 17 depending on how you want to count.)