Trump crushes Biden in latest ABC News poll

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,668
6,839
113
No, I said maybe the Democrats think that. But what you choose to focus on in my post is interesting indeed; it's almost like you don't think no one is above the law. Regardless, not a great start if you're trying to demonstrate reading comprehension.

I'm any case, you might want to look up "fair comment" under US law. Also, as the statements weren't made in any US state, so I could only be charged with federal criminal libel, which this clearly isn't.

Plus I think it's fair to say that when we talk about no one being "above the law", generally we mean criminal acts, called felonies in the states, and slander/libel, with the exception of criminal libel which this isn't, is civil law. Afterall, the Democrats can't control whether private citizens bring civil cases against someone or not, so it would be weird to call those "political".

But hey, if it makes you feel better, don't address the point that maybe the prosecutor thinks people who break the law should be held accountable rather than worrying about the political ramifications. Because it seems to me that right from the start of all this plenty of people were saying this would help Trump and hurt the Democrats.
Yah, yeah, yeah. No one is above the law ...so no filling of criminal charges, just an attempted shakedown by nutjob backed by a Democrat billionaire.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
Yah, yeah, yeah. No one is above the law ...so no filling of criminal charges, just an attempted shakedown by nutjob backed by a Democrat billionaire.
No filing of criminal charges? He's been charged with 34 felonies. Felony is American for indictable which is Canadian for Criminal. So yes, filing of criminal charges.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,384
5,478
113
Clearly the filing of charges have helped Trump in the polls, not hurt him
 

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
7,449
7,531
113
The Dems have never seriously proposed taking "our guns". They have proposed thoughtful restrictions on the ownership of certain types of guns and magazines and various measures to control who can own a gun. Regrettably the GOP is still owned by the NRA.
All tentative of gun law by the Dems were crushed down by the GOP majority in senate. They were never able to do anything.

Money talks. And money is the NRA. So we should all shut the fuck up and let the Americans kill themselves. If they are that idiot there is not much we can do. It's their life after all not ours.

Let's stop trying to convince them otherwise and please no more fucking thought and prayers my ass...
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
Clearly the filing of charges have helped Trump in the polls, not hurt him
Basically what I've been trying to say in this thread is that right from the start everyone said this would help Trump and not hurt him. And I think that debunks the narrative that these were politically motivated, especially since, even if convicted, he's not prevented from running, winning, or bring sworn in as President.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,668
6,839
113
No filing of criminal charges? He's been charged with 34 felonies. Felony is American for indictable which is Canadian for Criminal. So yes, filing of criminal charges.
ROTFLMFAO!! In the "rape" case. It's a civil suit.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
ROTFLMFAO!! In the "rape" case. It's a civil suit.
At no point did I mention the rape case, and none of the comments I replied to mentioned the rape case. 🤷‍♂️

You're actually the first person to mention the rape case. And the first post that started all this was:

"Seems the politically motivated criminal charges against Trump are having the opposite effect"

So I guess you're ROTFLMAO at yourself either because of poor reading comprehension skills or maybe your were unaware criminal charges had been laid and can't believe your ignorance. Either way, on ignore you go for trolling.
 
Last edited:

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
And yet, plenty of Americans believe that's the Democrat agenda, even when it's explained how it isn't. Case and point:


Which was my whole argument. Why didn't Biden do it? Because Democrats don't support it.
I think that you are right but I think the disbelief is more a function of the GOP being much better at messaging and controlling the narrative.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
All tentative of gun law by the Dems were crushed down by the GOP majority in senate. They were never able to do anything.

Money talks. And money is the NRA. So we should all shut the fuck up and let the Americans kill themselves. If they are that idiot there is not much we can do. It's their life after all not ours.

Let's stop trying to convince them otherwise and please no more fucking thought and prayers my ass...
Sad but you are probably right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jalimon

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,929
7,906
113
You keep dodging my question.

Why did Biden not enact an assault rifle ban when he had control of all 3 branches of government??!! He had control from 2021 to 2022. So he had a full year to do it, and nobody could have stopped him.

I'll tell you why. He's a senile, old, incompetent, useless fuck, and he needs to be voted out in 2024.
Once again I answered it and you are not paying any attention at all. Biden pushed an assault weapons ban when he was the head of the Committee in nineties!!
The Republicans then overturned when it expired. Why do you give them a pass?
Once again you need a 2/3rds majority in the Senate to Pass such a Constitution Amendment to the Legislation. The Democrats do not have it. Of course you blame Biden for it when it is the real asshole Republicans that pander to the gun lobby!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,384
5,478
113
Once again I answered it and you are not paying any attention at all. Biden pushed an assault weapons ban when he was the head of the Committee in nineties!!
The Republicans then overturned when it expired. Why do you give them a pass?
Once again you need a 2/3rds majority in the Senate to Pass such a Constitution Amendment to the Legislation. The Democrats do not have it. Of course you blame Biden for it when it is the real asshole Republicans that pander to the gun lobby!!
Are you saying just for an assault rifle ban (and I dont mean a total firearms ban) Biden needs a constitutional amendment???
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,384
5,478
113
He needs 60 votes in the Senate. Point a finger at the Republicans for once!!
That's not what you said in your previous post though.
You said he needed an constitutional amendment.

Do you stand by your comment that Biden needs a constitutional amendment??
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,165
5,259
113
He needs 60 votes in the Senate. Point a finger at the Republicans for once!!
No they don't. Its a rule that can be changed. They did it for judge appointments. The filibuster can be jettisoned by a simple majority vote. And they could pass all legislation with the three branches.

But its a convenient excuse not to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,929
7,906
113
That's not what you said in your previous post though.
You said he needed an constitutional amendment.

Do you stand by your comment that Biden needs a constitutional amendment??
No they don't. Its a rule that can be changed. They did it for judge appointments. The filibuster can be jettisoned by a simple majority vote. And they could pass all legislation with the three branches.

But its a convenient excuse not to.

Listen if the Republicans are interested in this this actual Gun ban then they should have supported a bipartisan bill to do so. They did it last year with the "Bipartisan Gun Violence Bill" that met the 60-40 threshold. Yes, 15 Republicans joined them then to the wrath and anger of the NRA as well as the Far Right Republicans!!


That is why they need something similar this time this time or or any other time, else it will not pass through the hung Senate that requires the VP to break the deadlock!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,929
7,906
113
But it will be interesting to see the next poll now that Rapist Trump is a fully convicted Sexual Predator!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,165
5,259
113
Listen if the Republicans are interested in this this actual Gun ban then they should have supported a bipartisan bill to do so. They did it last year with the "Bipartisan Gun Violence Bill" that met the 60-40 threshold. Yes, 15 Republicans joined them then to the wrath and anger of the NRA as well as the Far Right Republicans!!


That is why they need something similar this time this time or or any other time, else it will not pass through the hung Senate that requires the VP to break the deadlock!!
You didn't acknowledge the reality. At anytime the Dems can solely bypass the filibuster and pass any legislation they want. Harry Reid did it to confirm judges.

And if they did so and passed legislation that continued to benefit citizens they would maintain power. But they won't. So its literally a choice not to go with a simple majority. Nothing is stopping them but themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,384
5,478
113
Listen if the Republicans are interested in this this actual Gun ban then they should have supported a bipartisan bill to do so. They did it last year with the "Bipartisan Gun Violence Bill" that met the 60-40 threshold. Yes, 15 Republicans joined them then to the wrath and anger of the NRA as well as the Far Right Republicans!!


That is why they need something similar this time this time or or any other time, else it will not pass through the hung Senate that requires the VP to break the deadlock!!
You didnt answer my question. Here it is again:

Do you stand by your comment that Biden needs a constitutional amendment??
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,384
5,478
113
You didn't acknowledge the reality. At anytime the Dems can solely bypass the filibuster and pass any legislation they want. Harry Reid did it to confirm judges.

And if they did so and passed legislation that continued to benefit citizens they would maintain power. But they won't. So its literally a choice not to go with a simple majority. Nothing is stopping them but themselves
It's so much fun watching bverhunter dig himself a hole 😂
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts