Trudeau unveils new campaign slogan: “I Got Jordan Peterson to Leave”

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,344
2,982
113
Its debatable.
But I know I would get in trouble at work, even if I was rude to someone.
I wouldn't be able to complain of someone infringing on my freedom of speech if I was taken to task for it.
you have the freedom to resign from a work environment if you felt your freedom of speech was being infringed upon
being kind, courtesy and supportive of fellow employees is a condition of employment,
you receive compensation for agreeing to these terms

you do not have the freedom to resign from a government & they are not paying you to bite your tongue
They work for you & you do not seem to understand this

is your employer the govt ?
trying to equate your freedom of speech work vs govt is incredibly stupid


'Free speech =/= freedom from consequences for political leaders =/= Totalitarianism
 
Last edited:

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,236
1,666
113
you do not have the freedom to resign from a government & they are not paying you to bite your tongue
Jordan Petersen did not work for the government.
Nor did the government do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
He was/is still free to speak or say anything he wants.
He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
Your argument as usual makes no sense.
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,791
9,545
113
Jordan Petersen did not work for the government.
Nor did the government do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
He was/is still free to speak or say anything he wants.
He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
Your argument as usual makes no sense.
Yeah wtf was all that government related bs? Government was literally the only party who hasn’t participated in that conflict. It was Peterson, his professional association and then the court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
26,080
52,180
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
I said he either asked someone to go kill themselves or alluded to it.
I certainly interpret that statement as asking someone to kill themselves.
So did millions of others, the professional body and the courts.
The conversation on twitter was about the planet being over populated and our only recourse being to cull the population.

His response to this one handle was that of them leaving the planet if they felt that negative about our chances.

He's explained this in many interviews...Which of course you haven't watched....The go kill yourself makes for a cool story though I guess. Glossier headline and all.

And what court exactly interpreted his comment in that way?
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,344
2,982
113
Jordan Petersen did not work for the government.
Nor did the government do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
He was/is still free to speak or say anything he wants.
He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
Your argument as usual makes no sense.
it makes no sense only if you do not understand how important freedom of speech is

He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
and where does this professional body get its authority from ?

The College of Psychologists of Ontario (CPO) is the regulatory college for the profession of psychology in Ontario, Canada. It sets the standards for the provision of psychological services by Psychologists and Psychological Associates.

The college maintains a register of all currently registered practitioners.
The College of Psychologists of Ontario (CPO) was established in 1960 through the Psychologists Registration Act, since amended.[7] In Canada, it became the first psychology regulatory legislation
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,236
1,666
113
and where does this professional body get its authority from ?
So what?
Yes we know it is a legal entity.
They did not do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
They cannot do anything either.
They held him accountable for violating their code of conduct that he signed.
Freedom of speech =/= freedom from consequences.
Jordan Petersen faced consequences for his unprofessional conduct.
He did not have his freedom of speech limited in any way.
You make no sense at all.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,344
2,982
113
By the way I am unsure why you keep signing off with this equation in everyone of your posts now.
It makes no sense. lol.

it is so you will understand how ridiculous you are
'Free speech =/= freedom from consequences for political leaders =/= Totalitarianism

it is not a signature, it is as truism which, you obviously do not understand
i am just reinforcing your woefully inadequate education
you are welcome
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,344
2,982
113
So what?
Yes we know it is a legal entity.
They did not do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
They cannot do anything either.
They held him accountable for violating their code of conduct that he signed.
Freedom of speech =/= freedom from consequences.
Jordan Petersen faced consequences for his unprofessional conduct.
He did not have his freedom of speech limited in any way.
You make no sense at all.
you do not keep track of your statements

Jordan Petersen did not work for the government.
yet he is being screwed around by a govt regulatory agency for his political views, not because of patient complaints
this is abusive
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
26,080
52,180
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
The only way to leave the planet, for good, is if you die.
Hence why that statement is interpreted as such.
It just doesn't sound as spicy as the way you framed it though does it?

If I tell you to go and kill yourself it has a little more impact than why don't you leave the planet.

Plus Elon wants to leave the planet doesn't he? Never heard him say he wanted to kill himself.

You never answer the which court interpreted Jordan's comment that way question....Hmmm...Wonder why not?
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,344
2,982
113
And all everyone understands from that line of yours is how ridiculous you prove yourself to be.
So keep it up!

i am not the one who thinks govt is more important than the private sector
i am not the one who thinks illegals are not criminals despite breaking the criminal code

you define ridiculous
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,236
1,666
113
you do not keep track of your statements
yet he is being screwed around by a govt regulatory agency for his political views, not because of patient complaints
this is abusive
Right.
And he does not.
He does not work for the CPO either.
You are still not making any sense.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,344
2,982
113
The first statement is true.
The second statement is a lie.
So keep up with the BS.
the second is no lie
i asked you to clarify your position on illegals being criminals for a week running and you refused to answer a direct question

you are playing the same stupid game as frank footer
 
Toronto Escorts