I think he asked someone to kill themselves or alluded to it.That’s great, doesn’t mean he wasn’t telling the truth.
Please identify the "truth" in that.
He was shit posting and got schooled for it.
He was told off for being unprofessional.
I think he asked someone to kill themselves or alluded to it.That’s great, doesn’t mean he wasn’t telling the truth.
This is why he got in trouble.In regards to your specific call out, he said “you’re free to leave at any point”.
You think?....Who specifically did he tell to kill themselves?I think he asked someone to kill themselves or alluded to it.
Please identify the "truth" in that.
He was shit posting and got schooled for it.
He was told off for being unprofessional.
free speech doesn't mean you can just blurt out anything that's in your head. Threatening words have will have consequences. also slander...we can all call Trump a convicted felon...we can call each other douchebags...there won't be any criminal offense or you can get charged with a civil case...you can get sued calling someone a rapist if there's no conviction....It's all "free speech". The point I am making is that "free speech" has to have limits, controls and exceptions.
Your issue is that you don't agree when the CPO and the judges say JP can't make unprofessional statements on social media because you like Peterson and you think you're smarter than the judges.
You can't understand the issue about his unprofessional comments and therefore you get mad when smarter people - like the judges - shut Peterson down.
I am not surprised you'd think saying I don't know about something equals preaching.
It's pretty much what you do.
Also childish repetition.
I think PeterParker1000 answered that one. See above.You think?....Who specifically did he tell to kill themselves?
You seem to be brainwashing yourself then.most children need to be taught via repetition
Its debatable.I think it’s a witch hunt.
No didn't cover it all...You made the post...So who did he specifically tell to kill themselves?I think PeterParker1000 answered that one. See above.
I said he either asked someone to go kill themselves or alluded to it.Not quite what you implied now is it?
you have the freedom to resign from a work environment if you felt your freedom of speech was being infringed uponIts debatable.
But I know I would get in trouble at work, even if I was rude to someone.
I wouldn't be able to complain of someone infringing on my freedom of speech if I was taken to task for it.
Jordan Petersen did not work for the government.you do not have the freedom to resign from a government & they are not paying you to bite your tongue
Yeah wtf was all that government related bs? Government was literally the only party who hasn’t participated in that conflict. It was Peterson, his professional association and then the court.Jordan Petersen did not work for the government.
Nor did the government do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
He was/is still free to speak or say anything he wants.
He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
Your argument as usual makes no sense.
By the way I am unsure why you keep signing off with this equation in everyone of your posts now.'Free speech=/= freedom from consequences for political leaders =/= Totalitarianism
The conversation on twitter was about the planet being over populated and our only recourse being to cull the population.I said he either asked someone to go kill themselves or alluded to it.
I certainly interpret that statement as asking someone to kill themselves.
So did millions of others, the professional body and the courts.
it makes no sense only if you do not understand how important freedom of speech isJordan Petersen did not work for the government.
Nor did the government do anything to limit his freedom of speech.
He was/is still free to speak or say anything he wants.
He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
Your argument as usual makes no sense.
and where does this professional body get its authority from ?He was taken to task by the professional body he is a member of, for violating their code of conduct.
The College of Psychologists of Ontario (CPO) was established in 1960 through the Psychologists Registration Act, since amended.[7] In Canada, it became the first psychology regulatory legislationThe College of Psychologists of Ontario (CPO) is the regulatory college for the profession of psychology in Ontario, Canada. It sets the standards for the provision of psychological services by Psychologists and Psychological Associates.
The college maintains a register of all currently registered practitioners.