Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
I'm always amazed that people think governments are required to publicly release all their intelligence sources. Would people demand a lawyer release their entire case to the news before trials?
For us spectators, it comes down to a he said, she said between Canada and India and from what I have seen about India's political issues, I tend to trust Canada's intelligence more.
Once again making accusations as fact while criticizing others for not providing you the evidence.
They are not required to release evidence to the public.
They are required to act.
If they keep talking, it is just talk.
This applies to India too.
But I believe they have acted.
Trudeau has not.
I have not made any accusations.
Only stated facts that are already reported.
It is fact, that Trudeau made accusations without presenting evidence.
It is fact that he hasn't acted on the evidence he says he possesses.
It is fact that India has presented dossiers, extradition requests etc which are more decisive actions.
Last edited:
Sorry but bullshit. You openly accused Trudeau of taking bribes. Your attempt to trump it and claim "I'm just repeating what I've heard" is not helpful.
You do understand the idea of diplomatic immunity right? Not much that Canada could legally do other than expel the diplomats. Did you miss when that happened or do you think Trudeau should play superhero and go arrest the guy?
Stop lying.
I posted that he is implicated in cash for access scandals.
I posted a wiki article.
So excuses and "trust me bro".
Am sure he can arrest the criminal gangs they say India used here.
Am sure you understand that the high commissioner himself did not take a gun and go hunt Sikh separatists at night.
Mulroney was not a politician? It is very relevant. You just cannot accept the facts. Period!!
You are the one that failed as you did not answer my question in the first place!!
Again you have not answered my question.
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!
Mulroney was not a politician when he was alleged to have accepted money.
He had stepped down and was a private citizen.
I asked you to show me an example where a politician accepted money directly into his chequing account.
You failed.
Maybe you forgot that Modi is the culprit in this whole affair.
But you of course idolize him!!
The culprits are these foreign separatists using and abusing their citizenship privileges.
Once again the bribe was from his time in office, irrespective of when he received it.
You again failed to answer my question in the first place. Face it, as you do not have a response!!
