Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?

[bver_hunter]

Voila?
For one your article says that Mulroney possibly received payments between 93 and 94 after he stepped down.
For another, read my question again.
Give me an example of a time when a sitting prime minister received money directly into their chequing accounts from a foreign country.

Where did you state "sitting politician"? You keep on moving the goal posts all the time!!
However, the Airbus deal was done during Mulroney's tenure. If he received the money after he left office but was based on when he was involved in the airbus affair during his PM tenure!!

Airbus Affair

The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraf...

www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

So you have not proven that the money went directly to Justin Trudeau. Yet you deflect by answering a question by asking another question. So answer what I asked you in the first place!!
Of course you cannot prove it!!

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Where did you state "sitting politician"? You keep on moving the goal posts all the time!!
However, the Airbus deal was done during Mulroney's tenure. If he received the money after he left office but was based on when he was involved in the airbus affair during his PM tenure!!

Airbus Affair

The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraf...

www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca

So you have not proven that the money went directly to Justin Trudeau. Yet you deflect by answering a question by asking another question. So answer what I asked you in the first place!!
Of course you cannot prove it!!

Okay I said politician.
Mulroney had stepped down.
Even then your example isn't relevant and you have failed.

 

[Frankfooter]

I am not accusing anyone so that requirement does not exist.

Yes, you are.
You keep accusing Trudeau, May, Singh and the RCMP of lying.

If you're now saying they didn't lie than this is 34 pages of trolling.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Yes, you are.
You keep accusing Trudeau, May, Singh and the RCMP of lying.

If you're now saying they didn't lie than this is 34 pages of trolling.

Don't put words in my mouth.

 

[Frankfooter]

Don't put words in my mouth.

Did you or did you not argue that Trudeau has been lying?

 

[roddermac]

Yes, you are.
You keep accusing Trudeau, May, Singh and the RCMP of lying.

If you're now saying they didn't lie than this is 34 pages of trolling.

They did. So what's your point?

 

[mandrill]

Malik murder trial evidence obtained by Global News | Watch

 

[basketcase]

There is simply no evidence presented for the diplomats are complicit claim.
...

I'm always amazed that people think governments are required to publicly release all their intelligence sources. Would people demand a lawyer release their entire case to the news before trials?

For us spectators, it comes down to a he said, she said between Canada and India and from what I have seen about India's political issues, I tend to trust Canada's intelligence more.

 

[basketcase]

Give me an example of a politician who takes money from foreign countries directly into their chequing accounts.

No.
I am going to blame RCMP and Trudeau for making accusations without evidence or follow up.

Once again making accusations as fact while criticizing others for not providing you the evidence.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

I'm always amazed that people think governments are required to publicly release all their intelligence sources. Would people demand a lawyer release their entire case to the news before trials?

For us spectators, it comes down to a he said, she said between Canada and India and from what I have seen about India's political issues, I tend to trust Canada's intelligence more.

They are not required to release evidence to the public.
They are required to act.
If they keep talking, it is just talk.
This applies to India too.
But I believe they have acted.
Trudeau has not.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Once again making accusations as fact while criticizing others for not providing you the evidence.

I have not made any accusations.
Only stated facts that are already reported.
It is fact, that Trudeau made accusations without presenting evidence.
It is fact that he hasn't acted on the evidence he says he possesses.
It is fact that India has presented dossiers, extradition requests etc which are more decisive actions.

 

[basketcase]

I have not made any accusations.
...

Sorry but bullshit. You openly accused Trudeau of taking bribes. Your attempt to trump it and claim "I'm just repeating what I've heard" is not helpful.

 

[basketcase]

They are not required to release evidence to the public.
They are required to act.
If they keep talking, it is just talk.
This applies to India too.
But I believe they have acted.
Trudeau has not.

You do understand the idea of diplomatic immunity right? Not much that Canada could legally do other than expel the diplomats. Did you miss when that happened or do you think Trudeau should play superhero and go arrest the guy?

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Sorry but bullshit. You openly accused Trudeau of taking bribes. Your attempt to trump it and claim "I'm just repeating what I've heard" is not helpful.

Stop lying.
I posted that he is implicated in cash for access scandals.
I posted a wiki article.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

You do understand the idea of diplomatic immunity right? Not much that Canada could legally do other than expel the diplomats. Did you miss when that happened or do you think Trudeau should play superhero and go arrest the guy?

So excuses and "trust me bro".
Am sure he can arrest the criminal gangs they say India used here.
Am sure you understand that the high commissioner himself did not take a gun and go hunt Sikh separatists at night.

 

[bver_hunter]

Okay I said politician.
Mulroney had stepped down.
Even then your example isn't relevant and you have failed.

Mulroney was not a politician? It is very relevant. You just cannot accept the facts. Period!!
You are the one that failed as you did not answer my question in the first place!!

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Mulroney was not a politician? It is very relevant. You just cannot accept the facts. Period!!
You are the one that failed as you did not answer my question in the first place!!

He stepped down as PM.
No longer in office.
You failed in your example.

 

[bver_hunter]

He stepped down as PM.
No longer in office.
You failed in your example.

Again you have not answered my question.
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!

 

[bver_hunter]

He stepped down as PM.
No longer in office.
You failed in your example.

But your idol called Modi was far worse than Mulroney:

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Again you have not answered my question.
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!

Mulroney was not a politician when he was alleged to have accepted money.
He had stepped down and was a private citizen.
I asked you to show me an example where a politician accepted money directly into his chequing account.
You failed.