Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
982
608
93
I'm always amazed that people think governments are required to publicly release all their intelligence sources. Would people demand a lawyer release their entire case to the news before trials?

For us spectators, it comes down to a he said, she said between Canada and India and from what I have seen about India's political issues, I tend to trust Canada's intelligence more.
They are not required to release evidence to the public.
They are required to act.
If they keep talking, it is just talk.
This applies to India too.
But I believe they have acted.
Trudeau has not.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
982
608
93
Once again making accusations as fact while criticizing others for not providing you the evidence.
I have not made any accusations.
Only stated facts that are already reported.
It is fact, that Trudeau made accusations without presenting evidence.
It is fact that he hasn't acted on the evidence he says he possesses.
It is fact that India has presented dossiers, extradition requests etc which are more decisive actions.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,259
6,658
113
They are not required to release evidence to the public.
They are required to act.
If they keep talking, it is just talk.
This applies to India too.
But I believe they have acted.
Trudeau has not.
You do understand the idea of diplomatic immunity right? Not much that Canada could legally do other than expel the diplomats. Did you miss when that happened or do you think Trudeau should play superhero and go arrest the guy?
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
982
608
93
You do understand the idea of diplomatic immunity right? Not much that Canada could legally do other than expel the diplomats. Did you miss when that happened or do you think Trudeau should play superhero and go arrest the guy?
So excuses and "trust me bro".
Am sure he can arrest the criminal gangs they say India used here.
Am sure you understand that the high commissioner himself did not take a gun and go hunt Sikh separatists at night.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,864
6,832
113
Okay I said politician.
Mulroney had stepped down.
Even then your example isn't relevant and you have failed.
Mulroney was not a politician? It is very relevant. You just cannot accept the facts. Period!!
You are the one that failed as you did not answer my question in the first place!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,864
6,832
113
He stepped down as PM.
No longer in office.
You failed in your example.
Again you have not answered my question.
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
982
608
93
Again you have not answered my question.
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!
Mulroney was not a politician when he was alleged to have accepted money.
He had stepped down and was a private citizen.
I asked you to show me an example where a politician accepted money directly into his chequing account.
You failed.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,864
6,832
113
Mulroney was not a politician when he was alleged to have accepted money.
He had stepped down and was a private citizen.
I asked you to show me an example where a politician accepted money directly into his chequing account.
You failed.
Once again the bribe was from his time in office, irrespective of when he received it.
You again failed to answer my question in the first place. Face it, as you do not have a response!!
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
982
608
93
Once again the bribe was from his time in office, irrespective of when he received it.
You again failed to answer my question in the first place. Face it, as you do not have a response!!
No the bribe was not from his time in office.
It was between 93 and 94 when he had stepped down as PM.
Those are the facts.
You failed at your example.
Your question is useless as it is a red herring especially given your failure.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,864
6,832
113
The culprits are these foreign separatists using and abusing their citizenship privileges.
No, the ones that ordered the killings, extortion and threats to Canadians.
Now it is the ones perpetrating the cyber threats:


Of course you will deny it!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,864
6,832
113
No the bribe was not from his time in office.
It was between 93 and 94 when he had stepped down as PM.
Those are the facts.
You failed at your example.
Your question is useless as it is a red herring especially given your failure.
Again you cannot comprehend that the bribes were due to the airbus contracts that were signed during his time in office:

In 1995, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) accused Mulroney and Frank Moores of accepting kickbacks from Karlheinz Schreiber on the sale of Airbus airplanes to the government-owned airline during Mulroney's time as Prime Minister of Canada. The allegations were made in a letter sent by the RCMP to the government of Switzerland seeking access to banking records. Schreiber had earlier raised money for Mulroney's successful 1983 bid to win the leadership of the Progressive Conservative Party.

Enough said!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
28,864
6,832
113
Those are the Sikh separatists.
They are engaged in crime, gun running, terrorism and other criminal activities.
Revoke and deport!
Then go and give your evidence to the RCMP. Really all useless allegations with the present day Sikhs who are peacefully protesting for an Independent Khalistan.
They have the Divine Rights to do so in a Democratic Nation like Canada!!
 
Toronto Escorts