Blondie Massage Spa

transit

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,878
2,965
113
The city has stood by for 30 years...for....THIS!

A colossal mistake.

I'm not so concerned that roads will be torn up worse than St. Clair just to get these tunnels for the LRT in place. Building anything will need 'construction' delays.

But the short term planning, with an inferior cheaper product, that will look all fancy for a few years....but once prone to breakdowns, will begin to fail for a number of reasons...not to mention our harsh weather....

We are a major city..needing major expenditure ...on top notch subways.

New York City has 600 miles of subways!!!!

To those who support this LRT cheaper product....I look forward to you standing on those exposed sidings as a bitter east wind cools you in January!
LRT is not the same as street car lines on ST.Clair.... Subways should eventually be built on Sheppard, but for now, with the money we have, this Transit City plan is good for Eglinton and Finch.
Fat boy thinks he was elected to build subways? Gee, subways cost more and I thought he was elected to reduce costs and taxes, not the opposite!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Personally I would support road tolls and parking taxes to pay for subways. That would be the best way forward, but I don't think the current council would go for that. Short the money for subways transit city is the next best thing.

It's silly to compare LRT to subway without discussing the cost. Plainly subways are better if they were free, but they are very costly and any talk of them needs to explain how they will be paid for, by who, by when, etc.

They aren't going to appear out of thin air, somebody somewhere had to pay whether it's higher property tax, road fees, income tax, somewhere we have to be willing to pay if we want to build billions of dollars of infrastructure.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,878
2,965
113
Personally I would support road tolls and parking taxes to pay for subways. That would be the best way forward, but I don't think the current council would go for that. Short the money for subways transit city is the next best thing.

It's silly to compare LRT to subway without discussing the cost. Plainly subways are better if they were free, but they are very costly and any talk of them needs to explain how they will be paid for, by who, by when, etc.

They aren't going to appear out of thin air, somebody somewhere had to pay whether it's higher property tax, road fees, income tax, somewhere we have to be willing to pay if we want to build billions of dollars of infrastructure.
Wash your mouth out with soap! ROAD TOLLS? The city was recently empowered with the right to charge a gas tax, so why not just use that method ( 2 cents/litre towards the Sheppard subway perhaps)?
 

jiiimmm

New member
Aug 16, 2007
1,502
0
0
north of the GTA
most of those who support LRTs will never ride them. I think its a shame for the future of the city. its unfortunate that politics has once again trumped the common good.

i guess i should say take solace in the fact that i don't have many years left in me, and that this will have no impact on me directly, but instead i am saddened by the short sightedness. the growth of this city is once again hindered, the future prosperity dimmed, the rider short changed and the poor left with a second rate system that literally leaves them out in the cold.
Very true, too much short sightedness by politicians that know nothing about running a decent system.
 

lurkerdick

Vagina Plumber
Feb 15, 2011
1,476
65
48
In her vagina
The LRT that runs a short distance from Kennedy to STC always has problems especially on weathered days...can you just imagine the future?
All the councillors should travel together for two months along the route first month by TTC routes then second month by car both ways.
 

jiiimmm

New member
Aug 16, 2007
1,502
0
0
north of the GTA
LRT is not the same as street car lines on ST.Clair.... Subways should eventually be built on Sheppard, but for now, with the money we have, this Transit City plan is good for Eglinton and Finch.
Fat boy thinks he was elected to build subways? Gee, subways cost more and I thought he was elected to reduce costs and taxes, not the opposite!
LRT sound sexy, service more people and cost less short term. But the hidden costs are the enormous upkeep to the lines and equipment, nobody will state those costs. When it's underground, it's protected from the elements, is more efficient, and cheaper in the long run. You get all the ugliness underground. Equipment lasts a lot longer when it's protected from the elements. It's a huge investment but well worth it in the end.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Jiiimmm are you willing to pay to bury it? Ideally in a tunnel wide enough for a future subway

Again... When the reality that this would mean something like road tolls or some other fee sets in, I find the gung ho subway supporters tend to quiet down
 

doggee_01

Active member
Jul 11, 2003
8,349
1
36
really i should not have started this......i don't live there and don't use toronto transit.
however you will never get cars off the road and the LRT will just compound the problem. subways are the only way to go
it will cost more and take longer but if you start and do a little at a time it will be worth it.
when i came to canada toronto had a not bad transit system for the number of people, montreal was a joke! now the montreal subway is pretty good(rubber wheels and all lol)and toronto is the joke
if people like stinz were around way back when, the young subway would never have been built, can you emagine toronto with no subway at all!!!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Wash your mouth out with soap! ROAD TOLLS? The city was recently empowered with the right to charge a gas tax, so why not just use that method ( 2 cents/litre towards the Sheppard subway perhaps)?
People would just fill up in Markham. The advantage of a road toll is that it would apply to everyone who comes into Toronto. Unless the gas tax was provincewide I don't think it would really work. Parking tax would also do the trick for the same reason.
 

zarbe

Member
Sep 6, 2010
494
0
16
In a hole in Scarborough
the sheppard subway is barely used, in my years commuting to downtown and back the subways have given me more delays than the scarborough rt which i find the seats more spacious :p. i want a system thats closer to me and something i can use in my lifetime
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,479
12
38
Wash your mouth out with soap! ROAD TOLLS? The city was recently empowered with the right to charge a gas tax, so why not just use that method ( 2 cents/litre towards the Sheppard subway perhaps)?
Just paying for their roads would run up the cost of gas to drivers by something like two bucks. Then add the premium for getting the underground alternative built.

We have to learn to vote for pols who promise to raise your taxes—and everyone else's—to pay for the stuff we all need and benefit from. The guy you should automatically distrust and almost never vote for is the guy promising he can improve your crumbling City for less than you're paying now. "I'll cut taxes and build subways", is promising free money. Like, "I'm selling the Brooklyn Bridge. It's a discount too good to pass up", it's phoney.

Anyway, the difference between taxes, tolls or gas premiums is just collection methods. Point is we picked a Mayor who promised gravy would pay for everything, eliminated the car tax so he could raise property taxes and spent the last year doing nothing about getting a dime of funding for a subway. Finally Council noticed all he'd done with the rope they gave him a year ago was hang himself.

The saddest part was hearing his pathetic suggestion that the plans should be studied by experts for another three months. As if they hadn't been studied enough, or as if he'd been too dim to notice the 'need' for study a year ago. Made ya almost feel sorry for him.
 

Thousand

Male Dancer in Brass Rail
Jan 19, 2002
763
0
16
The people of Toronto wants subway. It is what's best for our future and economic growth.

Let there be true democracy. Let there be a vote!

Thousand
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,479
12
38
The people of Toronto wants subway. It is what's best for our future and economic growth.

Let there be true democracy. Let there be a vote!

Thousand
There was. Or are you suggesting a referendum, like the one where we voted against amalgamation f'rinstance? Do you really imagine the question would include the tax increases required to pay for subways? The way most folks saying, 'let there be subways' are talking, the question wouldn't even have the routes on it, let alone costs or how to come up with the money. After all, our Mayor couldn't figure that out, and that's his job. Never mind he had plenty of paid help. The plan that our elected representatives passed at least was costed and the money found.

Asking for a referendum on 'Do we want subways' is a useful as asking for one on 'Do we hate winter'.

And a propos of nothing and just for fun, ask Tim Hudak why he voted to fill in the subway we were digging along Eglinton, back when he was in Cabinet. I'm just trying to figure out if him telling Ford to ignore Council means that he thinks the Mayor back then should have ignored his government and kept digging? Then as now, it was money talkng, and Ford never came up with any.

I'm listening, but I don't hear any one shouting, "let there be higher taxes to pay for subways!"
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,333
13
38
I believe her plan involved a mix between underground and above ground. In doing so they anticipate being able to add more service for the same price. As usual though, only time will tell.
I was told that the LRT is 70% underground. Is this true?
 

avxl1003

New member
Aug 31, 2009
1,346
0
0
Wash your mouth out with soap! ROAD TOLLS? The city was recently empowered with the right to charge a gas tax, so why not just use that method ( 2 cents/litre towards the Sheppard subway perhaps)?
Unfortunately, the only thing our portly leader hates more than LRT is taxes. He will never impose a toll, tax, user fee on anything. If he did, the populace would go nuts on him for cancelling the Vehicle Registration Tax when he was declaring that Toronto had a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

The fact is (and it is a fact) we were never getting Subways. We WERE getting one single buried LRT line along Eglinton for $8 billion.. But that's it. There was no plan for funding, and there was likely never going to be.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,333
13
38
The plan that our elected representatives passed at least was costed and the money found.
If it's a greater bang for the buck, and if most is underground (in Etobicoke or Mississauga, Eglinton was made purposely wide to accommodate, and that's why certain houses along a stretch are City owned-rentals to avoid expropriation delays), well then, that's all we will get.

It's a shame that we can't get a world-class subway system but if the LRT is not like that blasted streetcar on St. Clair (& it's car killer), then perhaps it's a good thing.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,479
12
38
I was told that the LRT is 70% underground. Is this true?
This morning's Star tried to clarify the differences between streetcars, LRTs and subways but made things worse by introducing LRVs. Now you're asking about LRPs? No wonder discussion's confused; we've got too many crossing vehicles, never mind which route we might be asking about.

As far back as Transit City, the LRT line along Eglinton included a buried section in the central area where the street is narrower and it should connect efficiently with the subways. Ford insisted every inch of the route should go underground, although he never would tell anyone how it would cross the Don, or why a six plus turning lane road through BigBox land couldn't take a coupla rails somewhere. Precisely what will be underground in the plan adopted you'll have to go to the source for, but it's likely very similar to the old TC plan as that's the only one anyone's actually done any meaningful work on.

I don't believe any of the other LRT routes are to have significant buried sections, after all, north of Eg even subways are above ground.
 

jiiimmm

New member
Aug 16, 2007
1,502
0
0
north of the GTA
Jiiimmm are you willing to pay to bury it? Ideally in a tunnel wide enough for a future subway

Again... When the reality that this would mean something like road tolls or some other fee sets in, I find the gung ho subway supporters tend to quiet down
Yes, I am willing to pay for a good long term transit plan created not by know nothing politicians, but by those in the transportation industry. It would be a mega project and would be a huge asset to the city. Road tolls will generate money but will not solve the congestion problem unless you take a long term view and plan for 20 plus years into the future.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts