Trans teen Brian wins a Miss America title
- Thread starter dirtyharry555
- Start date
- Status
I took a big risk when I posted this thread.
(323) Transgender Beauties | Toronto Escorts Review Board Forum | Terb
(323) Transgender Beauties | Toronto Escorts Review Board Forum | Terb
What kind of question is this?
Man - cock and balls, xy chromosome
Woman - vag and tits, xx chromosome
You have an alternative definition?
A man is a man.
A woman is a woman or a man who thinks/believes/wishes he's a woman.
Depends on what they're packing below the waist.
What's your definition of man and woman? You don't have one, am I right?
No you can't change your answer. You said xy with cock and balls are men, and xx with with vag and tits is women. So what gender are people with down syndrome since they fit neither of those?
I also have some follow up questions, like, what about fat guys with tits? How do we know which tits make your gender? And intersex people, what do we do with them? Does a man stop being a man if he loses his dick or balls? What about just one ball? Are women with mastectomies not women? Again does it matter if she lost just one tit, or does it have to be both? What about flat chested women?
You pose a lot of questions without answering any yourself. That's extremely rude.
I ask, for a third time, what is your definition of man and woman?
I'll begin answering your barrage of questions when you answer my single question.
My answer is simple, who ever identifies as a man is a man, whoever identifies as a woman is a woman.
Now answer my questions, systematically.
How can I have a discussion with someone whose position is that there is no such thing as biological males and females.
Your definition isn't a definition at all... it's a meaningless statement.
Well discussions usually work by asking clarifying questions, so, please answer mine, and then if you have questions on my views I can answer yours as well.
You have not answered my question. You have failed to define males and females. It makes as much sense as me saying that anyone who identifies as a tree is a tree.
No worthwhile discussion can be had on that basis.
Incorrect, I answered your question on my definition of man and woman, it is you who refuses to answer my questions because you don't have answers
The competition is a scholarship competition now, isn't it?
I remember them making some kind of big deal about that at one point. (I don't follow pageants.)
There's no beauty competition anymore at all.
The scores are from the interviews, the talent section, the social impact plan the person has, and like general stage presence.
I think "scholarship competitions" set up this way are kind of dumb, but I get why Miss America tried to re-invent itself after becoming more and more irrelevant.
I don't know. It's a little over the top to me. (It may be a winner's dress though, since the other contestants all seem to have a more consistent style.)
Honestly, I thought so too. I don’t truly believe they are the dresses from the pageant itself. And I still think the dress would look better in purple but I am bias. LOL
You're fishphobic. If there are no definitions, then everything is possible based on how we feel. Forget science, it sucks!
- Status
