Falling debris from the collapse of 1WTC caused the fire and subsequent collapse of 7WTC.assoholic said:well then consider in fact 3 buildings collapsed and no plane hit the third.
agree...it goes both ways! you can open your own mind or have others do it for you.Asterix said:Or a sieve for a brain.
viking1965 said:Falling debris from the collapse of 1WTC caused the fire and subsequent collapse of 7WTC.
A bit of debris? I think it's important to recognize that all these buildings were built at the same time, with the same materials, and with the same methods. To compare them directly to any other buildings, China or elsewhere, is ridiculous. Any flaw or weakness in the design or materials used in the WTC would naturally be reflected in all. If you agree that the Twin Towers were brought down by the impact of the airplanes, which if you don't I'm out of this discussion because it becomes endless mental wanking, why would you think someone would choose the opportunity to specifically bring down WT7? Paranoia strikes deep.assoholic said:..um ya o'k, for only the third time in history it happened.
There was a clip awhile ago of a building in China ,
should have seen it.
Burning like crazy for I think 24 hours.
Yet it did not collapse.
This one gets a bit of debris and pancackes.
Sure it did.
The Reason the WTC main towers collapased was because of the intense fire in the middle of the building from the jet fuel. The buildings were hollow in that the main strength of the buildings is in the exterior steel. The planes punctured almost a whole side clean weakening the building. Once the jet fuel heat and burning debris starts to cook any interior structure, the steel will start to heat up and weaken. Jet fuel burns around 1500F and steel isn't that strong at that point. Do that for close to an hour and the steel starts to go taffy like. Once that happens, the upper floors weight starts to collapse downwards and momentum of all that weight coming down takes the whole building down. The design of the WTC was perfect for this scenario.assoholic said:..um ya o'k, for only the third time in history it happened.
There was a clip awhile ago of a building in China ,
should have seen it.
Burning like crazy for I think 24 hours.
Yet it did not collapse.
This one gets a bit of debris and pancackes.
Sure it did.
You know you have the perfect handle. An asshole....without any credibility. Like that idiot Rosie O'Donnell, I will take you seriously when you show your engineering credentials.assoholic said:...for only the third time in history.
All on the same day, nuff said, sheople.
I couldn't have said it better myself.Bearlythere said:You know you have the perfect handle. An asshole....without any credibility. Like that idiot Rosie O'Donnell, I will take you seriously when you show your engineering credentials.
LOL!!!Bearlythere said:You know you have the perfect handle.
Took you a LONG time to figure that out pekkerhead? I have been insulting you for a long time about your handle. As usual rather than commenting on the science involved you chose to go after me because you of course want to believe Bush and Cheney knocked down those planes. Why they paid people to plant the bombs inside and then used their evil henchmen to detonate them while the conspiriters were inside.WoodPeckr said:LOL!!!
Your handle, Bearlythinkin' ain't half-bad either....
Depends whose science you want to believe. Since you're Bearlythinkin' you just follow what El Rushbloe/Rove serve up to dine on...Bearlythere said:Took you a LONG time to figure that out pekkerhead? I have been insulting you for a long time about your handle. As usual rather than commenting on the science involved you chose to go after me because you of course want to believe Bush and Cheney knocked down those planes. Why they paid people to plant the bombs inside and then used their evil henchmen to detonate them while the conspiriters were inside.
I wasn't aware science ever had anything to do with how you arrive at your conclusions.WoodPeckr said:Depends whose science you want to believe.
LOL!!!Asterix said:I wasn't aware science ever had anything to do with how you arrive at your conclusions.
Uh-huh.WoodPeckr said:LOL!!!
Well now you know.
All my conclusions are based on sound empirical science TY!....
Yepper!Bearlythere said:Science can easily explain how those towers came down and again,....