Tin Foil Hat Thread on 9/11

[lookingforitallthetime]

I deleted the thread because it was hijacked by an idiot.

Moi?

 

[danmand]

Moi?

Non monsieur, You are not an idiot.

 

[someone]

Did you delete your thread where you were citing "scientific" journals from Arab countries "proving" that there was thermite in the WTC?

Where's this new video from, I can't understand Danish--is it also funded by some Emir with an anti-American axe to grind?

When I read that thread, I really wondered why I had not heard anything about it in the mainstream media (it must have gotten deleted before I had a chance to read the follow up posts). It seemed too amazing to be true, given that I had heard nothing about it elsewhere. I forget the name of the journal, but if someone can post the name, I would be interested in finding out how it is regarded in the engineering profession. I am sure that engineers must do journal rankings the way other academic discplines do.

 

[Mcluhan]

When I read that thread, I really wondered why I had not heard anything about it in the mainstream media (it must have gotten deleted before I had a chance to read the follow up posts). It seemed too amazing to be true, given that I had heard nothing about it elsewhere. I forget the name of the journal, but if someone can post the name, I would be interested in finding out how it is regarded in the engineering profession. I am sure that engineers must do journal rankings the way other academic discplines do.

The thermate issue is now out in the open. If you have the time to listen to the video of Steve Jones presentation, (my third link above )its all there. Since this video was made, there is a new update and a release this month by Steve Jones.

If your interested, there is also a hypothetical blasting scenario. If you want it, i will find the link. Its current, published in April 09.

Since you are also a professional, you might be interested in these three web sites

http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html#EForbes

http://firefightersfor911truth.org/
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

 

[lookingforitallthetime]

Non monsieur, You are not an idiot.

Looks like I fooled another one.

I hope you don't mean Aardvark, he isn't an idiot either and he certainly wasn't hijacking the thread.

 

[fuji]

When I read that thread, I really wondered why I had not heard anything about it in the mainstream media (it must have gotten deleted before I had a chance to read the follow up posts). It seemed too amazing to be true, given that I had heard nothing about it elsewhere. I forget the name of the journal, but if someone can post the name, I would be interested in finding out how it is regarded in the engineering profession. I am sure that engineers must do journal rankings the way other academic discplines do.

I don't remember the name of the journal itself, but it was a publication of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd., which is a United Arab Emirates publishing company.

I am sure that they do fine work, but given the political sensitivities around 9/11 and the fact that it was an attack on the United States by Arab nationals, you have to wonder whether the Arab publishers have an axe to grind.

I'll wait until these "scientific" claims appear in a non-Arab publication, thank you very much.

 

[danmand]

http://www.bentham.org/index.htm

A major STM journal publisher of 92 online and print journals, 200 plus open access journals, and related print/online book series, Bentham Science answers the informational needs of the pharmaceutical, biomedical and medical research community.

Leading journals include Current Pharmaceutical Design (Impact Factor 4.868), Current Medicinal Chemistry (Impact Factor 4.944), the leading review journal in its field and endorsed by 7 Nobel Laureates. Other high profile journals include Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry (Impact Factor 4.325), Current Drug Metabolism (Impact Factor 4.490) and Current Drug Targets (Impact Factor 4.035), Current Molecular Medicine ( Impact Factor 4.624), Current Cancer Drug Targets (Impact Factor 5.385).

NEW: Bentham Science Publishers are launching more than 200 peer-reviewed open access journals, under the banner of "BENTHAM OPEN". These free-to-view online journals cover all major disciplines of science, technology, and medicine,



Nobel prize winners endorsing the company's journals:
http://www.bentham.org/Nobel.htm

 

[fuji]

A major STM journal publisher of 92 online and print journals, 200 plus open access journals, and related print/online book series....

....based in the United Arab Emirates.

 

[someone]

I am sure that they do fine work, but given the political sensitivities around 9/11 and the fact that it was an attack on the United States by Arab nationals, you have to wonder whether the Arab publishers have an axe to grind.

Given the political sensitivities, I have to wonder why the authors would choose an Arab journal, if they had other options. They must have known it would raise suspicions. Thus, I think I will reserve judgement until I hear more.

 

[danmand]

Given the political sensitivities, I have to wonder why the authors would choose an Arab journal, if they had other options. They must have known it would raise suspicions. Thus, I think I will reserve judgement until I hear more.

- without prejudice-

I have been unable to establish that the Bentham Science journals are "Arab",
whatever that means. In any event, I would hope anyone trained as a scientist
would judge an article on it's content, not on the country of origin of the journal
in which it is published.

 

[papasmerf]

- without prejudice-

I have been unable to establish that the Bentham Science journals are "Arab",
whatever that means. In any event, I would hope anyone trained as a scientist
would judge an article on it's content, not on the country of origin of the journal
in which it is published.

Since governments pay for science in their countries many control the research.

Like it or not much of the research done today is politically motivated.


And when you are talking the US did it themselves you need a reality check. 9-11 was a result of Bush's refusal to pay tributes set up by Clinton.

 

[danmand]

Since governments pay for science in their countries many control the research.

Like it or not much of the research done today is politically motivated.


And when you are talking the US did it themselves you need a reality check. 9-11 was a result of Bush's refusal to pay tributes set up by Clinton.

Are you postulating that scientific research at the chemistry department at University of Copenhagen
is politically motivated?

 

[papasmerf]

Are you postulating that scientific research at the chemistry department at University of Copenhagen
is politically motivated?

Are you saying that the people who control the purse strings do not present requests to the researchers?

 

[danmand]

Are you saying that the people who control the purse strings do not present requests to the researchers?

Play on by yourself, papa.

 

[fuji]

I have been unable to establish that the Bentham Science journals are "Arab"

This is their head office:

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Executive Suite Y - 26
PO Box 7917, Saif Zone
Sharjah,
U.A.E.

I would hope anyone trained as a scientist
would judge an article on it's content

So the speculation would be that scientists did that, and that is why the authors were unable to get their results published in a non-Arab journal. An Arab journal, owned by a publisher with an axe to grind, even if it normally has reasonable standards, might loosen those standards for political reasons.

I notice on their page for authors, where you submit new journal articles, the "contact us" email address is this:

mansoor7@cyber.net.pk

So that's someone in pakistan.

 

[papasmerf]

Play on by yourself, papa.

You seem to avoid reality

that is a sign of immaturity and self importance.

 

[fuji]

This is an interesting read:

http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0804/msg00027.html

Maybe "Bentham Science Publishers" is not really as reputable as our friend from Denmark pretends. It looks like they were once a going concern as a publisher that has fallen into "bad hands".

I wonder if the article Damnand has quoted was in reality written by an Arab intelligence agency, or some branch of Al Qaeda.

 

[papasmerf]

This is an interesting read:

http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0804/msg00027.html

Maybe "Bentham Science Publishers" is not really as reputable as our friend from Denmark pretends. It looks like they were once a going concern as a publisher that has fallen into "bad hands".

I wonder if the article Damnand has quoted was in reality written by an Arab intelligence agency, or some branch of Al Qaeda.

demand has alway hinted at his political and religious agenda. I am beginning to see this more and more. Rather than defend his position he has taken a woodpecker like stance and began to insult those who challenge him. While I have never enjoyed his Danish language posts and URLs I have found that the practical interpretation of many of his posts to be somewhat informative in a socialists perspective.

Now that Obamma has began his socialist agenda we will see more from this child.

 

[lookingforitallthetime]

demand has alway hinted at his political and religious agenda. I am beginning to see this more and more. Rather than defend his position he has taken a woodpecker like stance and began to insult those who challenge him. While I have never enjoyed his Danish language posts and URLs I have found that the practical interpretation of many of his posts to be somewhat informative in a socialists perspective.

I guess everyone has a political agenda, yourself included.

Now that Obamma has began his socialist agenda we will see more from this child.

LOL. Good one Pappy. American conservatives never cease to amaze me. Where were your cries of a socialist agenda when your man, Bush, essentially nationalized the banks?

 

[papasmerf]

I guess everyone has a political agenda, yourself included.




LOL. Good one Pappy. American conservatives never cease to amaze me. Where were your cries of a socialist agenda when your man, Bush, essentially nationalized the banks?

????????????

You mean right after he bombed the WTC???