This time next year
- Thread starter buttercup
- Start date
Please keep this off the board. Its obvious, there is a clear history of rival opinions and mutual dislike for each other. PM each other instead.
Might to be on to something, might be a loop hole in there somewhere.really hmmmm .....
almost for sure I deserve a spanking
We can talk about that, when I see you again. :eyebrows:
There needs to be a filter to filter out cops/set-ups, and we need an encrypted network made up of trustworthy people to maintain it and also have a strict policy on membership, beyond terb. Perhaps the dark side of terb
If you can find the dark side, so can LE. But, seriously, why would they bother?
Street sweeps are so much easier, pimp hangouts and declassé hotels are obvious. That's how LE will earn their brownie points. Just pick the low-hanging fruit.
I don't see anything in Bill C-36 that promises police departments whopping budget increases to sting savvy clients.
I don't get this.
You're allowed to be a prostitute, but we'll make it very unlikely that you'll have any clients.
A lot of things don't make sense.
It's legal to buy alcohol.
It'l legal to buy cigarettes.
It's legal to buy bomb making materials.
It's legal to buy guns.
In the States it's illegal to buy Kinder Surprise.
In Canada it's Illegal to buy sex.
And I suspect there'll be allot more of those places, once the the law kicks in. How stupid is that????
My regulars know how to get in touch with me and are not worried. What is to say they aren't coming over here for lunch. I really doubt LE has the manpower to stalk my front door and even if they did, where is the proof. I think being established makes me a much safer bet and having my own place. There is no way for entrapment to occur. I really do think the established ladies will do very well with this new law. It would be suicidal to call a newbie as that coudl be a sting. There will be no harm in seeing established escortts-totally safe. What is all of the paranoia? I can still advertise so men can find me. as long as it isn't in Canada. There is no way they can prove anything having my own place. so calm down.
I do believe Marla is slowly creating a Monopoly. Not that theres anything wrong with that!
then do as you promised and add me to your ignore list. Pretty please?
Keep this garbage out of this thread and between the two of you via pm's
Anyways, back on a serious note, and possibly a way around the new bill. I've had great success in having "dates" with a great happy ending on a more ongoing basis with women through sites like these.
They are not prostitutes (though there are many on these sites too). In all cases, I never mentioned sex. It just happened.
Since early 1900 prostitution was not illegal but a bevy of related charges were that persecuted primarily the sex trade worker. The sex trade workers have been living with this cloud of potential threat up until Bedford. The sex trade workers haven't been complaining or running for cover, but working around the law and finding creative loopholes to work within the framework.
They have persevered and braved it out for the sake of their industry and a belief in what they are doing. They were the ones that faced potential arrest, not the Johns. Agencies flourished despite the common bawdy house and living off of the avails laws. Why? Because arrests that were made were ALWAYS thrown out of court so LE gave up. So the the sex trade industry prospered right under LE's nose and they just gave it lip service.
I have a client who is a cop and he says the only time he approaches the street walkers is to make sure they are feeling safe. Yet it is illegal to solicit. So talk about a blind eye. It is futile to make arrests. Much to the chagrin of the LE, the same thng will happen with the enactment of Bill C-36 and the LE will soon lose interest as the cases are tossed out of court. The intitial cases will involve street walkers and the lawyers have predicted this bill is unconstitutional and won't hold up in a court of law. So even if it takes 5 years to amend it in the SCC, LE won't be bothering and will give a blind eye to it just as they have for the last many years for the sex trade worker. It won't be any different.
They have persevered and braved it out for the sake of their industry and a belief in what they are doing. They were the ones that faced potential arrest, not the Johns. Agencies flourished despite the common bawdy house and living off of the avails laws. Why? Because arrests that were made were ALWAYS thrown out of court so LE gave up. So the the sex trade industry prospered right under LE's nose and they just gave it lip service.
I have a client who is a cop and he says the only time he approaches the street walkers is to make sure they are feeling safe. Yet it is illegal to solicit. So talk about a blind eye. It is futile to make arrests. Much to the chagrin of the LE, the same thng will happen with the enactment of Bill C-36 and the LE will soon lose interest as the cases are tossed out of court. The intitial cases will involve street walkers and the lawyers have predicted this bill is unconstitutional and won't hold up in a court of law. So even if it takes 5 years to amend it in the SCC, LE won't be bothering and will give a blind eye to it just as they have for the last many years for the sex trade worker. It won't be any different.
Peace officers all have different motivations as to why they went into LE. They are after all only human, at least most of them and exercise their personal biases and prejudices in doing their jobs. LE is also beholden to community standards and tolerences. For every easy going cop, there is an overzealous one. What York Region LE will do with Bill C-36 will likely be far different then what their counterparts in Toronto, Ottawa or Montreal will do with it. This time next year business will be way down and fear way up among johns. Sexworkers and pimps will see their revenues drop off signicantly and may be forced to consider a second job or even abandon the trade all together. The new law is a game changer and the scene is soon to be much different. It will take a long time for any relevant or significant court actions to affect the new bill.
With all due respect, that is not the read I have obtained from my clients. They feel with precaution, visiting established incalls, not seeing new workers and not going to agencies they will be ok. They aren't about to stop going to escorts. I think there is a lot of prevailing paranoia perhaps from the hobbyists who like to see new faces, which would be suicidal to do if in fact it does become legislation. I am not disagreeing with you, just discussing what my clients are telling me.
My comments were as to what is likely to come regarding the general picture, not local or personal forecasts. Most likely some established independents may see an increase in business as they have previous good will and their clients who visit other soon to be less secure places as well will abandon these places and stick with discrete tried and true independents. But in general across the land the number of prostitute sex related transactions per day will decrease by this time next year. Many sex workers will find other sidelines or even go back to school, maybe you will be one of the successful anomalies. Good luck to you.
