Remember last year when you said you didn't think Putin would live through this war?They defended themselves.
Remember last year when you said you didn't think Putin would live through this war?They defended themselves.
The war is far, far form over. How's the offensive going? Are the Ukrainian knocking on Moscow's gates, yet?Remember last year when you said you didn't think Putin would live through this war?
Why would they go to Moscow?The war is far, far form over. How's the offensive going? Are the Ukrainian knocking on Moscow's gates, yet?
They'll bypass it in order to prolong it. ROTFLMFAO!!! The Washington's Uniparty will fight Putin to the last Ukrainian, Georgian or Kazakh, and whoever else they can sucker in into a war. Because big, bold wars are profitable and make for good "politics".When is NATO going to reach Moscow?
Nah, only Putin wins if it is delayed.They'll bypass it in order to prolong it. ROTFLMFAO!!! The Washington's Uniparty will fight Putin to the last Ukrainian, Georgian or Kazakh, and whoever else they can sucker in into a war. Because big, bold wars are profitable and make for good "politics".
That's the comment of someone who has never even seen any of the games I'm talking about. They aren't for kids. They are for people with a serious interest in military history and tactics. The only fantasy element these games sometimes offer is "what if" scenarios. You won't find gaming that is any more "real life". They are used in real life command training.Nah, moved out of my mom's basement when I was 18.
Zero interest in virtual or fantasy anything. Real life is so much more interesting.
I don't know much about World of Warcraft (other than it is online fantasy game), but I do know it's not what I'm talking about. The games I refer to are board games, and they deal with real military conflicts in great detail. Supply, morale, troop quality, prep fire, overwatch, overrun, combined arms, fog of war, weather, logistics, zones of control, command and control - you name it.Does World of Warcraft have adjustments for things like the morale (or lack thereof) of individual soldiers? Of military incompetence? Fundamental supply chain problems? Foundational corruption? Can your your enemy divide itself from within with, say, a Prigohzin character?
Individual battles (such as in a boxing ring) offer the opportunity for unlikely results (a lucky punch in boxing - for example). Mass conflicts, much less so. Luck tends to even out over large numbers. Just like rolling dice tending to even the distribution of the rolls over time.Maybe if the "weaker force" acted emotionally, on impulse. That would make it the weaker force right there. Like Russia.
Lots of examples of big 400 lb meatheads getting their heads shoved up their own asses by a more intelligent, more disciplined "weaker" and lighter opponent.
Anyways, thanks for the discussion but shouldn't you be getting back downstairs to the battle?
Considers calling someone a Marxist an insult.Don't you object to member insulting other members in your very next post? And here you go insulting Frankie who is a smart and interesting member of this board.
Sometimes you confuse me, Earp.
The war is far, far form over. How's the offensive going? Are the Ukrainian knocking on Moscow's gates, yet?
When is NATO going to reach Moscow?
War is good for politics. Also by this summer Oil&Gas assures us that the US will totally give up on Ukraine. Which is it sunshine.They'll bypass it in order to prolong it. ROTFLMFAO!!! The Washington's Uniparty will fight Putin to the last Ukrainian, Georgian or Kazakh, and whoever else they can sucker in into a war. Because big, bold wars are profitable and make for good "politics".
That's the comment of someone who has never even seen any of the games I'm talking about. They aren't for kids. They are for people with a serious interest in military history and tactics. The only fantasy element these games sometimes offer is "what if" scenarios. You won't finding gaming that is any more "real life". They are used in real life command training.
Again I must reiterate that people laugh at you and never with you.That's the comment of someone who has never even seen any of the games I'm talking about. They aren't for kids. They are for people with a serious interest in military history and tactics. The only fantasy element these games sometimes offer is "what if" scenarios. You won't finding gaming that is any more "real life". They are used in real life command training.
p.s. It's a little ironic for anyone (including myself) who hangs out on a pooner board to claim that they are always "keeping it real"! LOL!
I don't know much about World of Warcraft (other than it is online fantasy game), but I do know it's not what I'm talking about. The games I refer to are board games, and they deal with real military conflicts in great detail. Supply, morale, troop quality, prep fire, overwatch, overrun, combined arms, fog of war, weather, logistics, zones of control, command and control - you name it.
Individual battles (such as in a boxing ring) offer the opportunity for unlikely results (a lucky punch in boxing - for example). Mass conflicts, much less so. Luck tends to even out over large numbers. Just like rolling dice tending to even the distribution of the rolls over time.
If the Ukrainians had overwhelming technical superiority in weaponry they might be able to overcome greater Russian numbers in open conflict. But they don't. As a result, open conflict, particularly as an attacker, doesn't favour the Ukrainians.
Instead, Ukrainians should be looking at how the Viet Cong and Taliban managed to win.
Stupid people do, I'm sure. I'm guessing that you are laughing.Again I must reiterate that people laugh at you and never with you.
Frank's oblivious to this point you make. Most people come here to have their views reaffirmed and block out anything that might conflict with that.To be fair, this is the internet. Almost nobody ever gets convinced of anything.
Cue up the arguing on the internet is like memes.
That's the comment of someone who has never even seen any of the games I'm talking about. They aren't for kids. They are for people with a serious interest in military history and tactics. The only fantasy element these games sometimes offer is "what if" scenarios. You won't finding gaming that is any more "real life". They are used in real life command training.
First, some of us have a longer history with Frank. His more extreme posts years ago were not getting a lot of traction so he has toned them down. Focusing on Trump always gains people on social media rapport and acceptance.Don't you object to member insulting other members in your very next post? And here you go insulting Frankie who is a smart and interesting member of this board.
Sometimes you confuse me, Earp.
I can assure you that JCpro is laughing. Probably while rolling on the floor. I am guessing it's a severe medical problem.Stupid people do, I'm sure. I'm guessing that you are laughing.
When he clarified that these games were for military use and not some Paradox game, I don't know why you guys are slagging so hard on him still.
So do you and your buddies award yourselves medals for bravery and promotions for winning these "serious" games, Dutch?
It's just another opportunity for learning. You could use quite a few of those.
So do you and your buddies award yourselves medals for bravery and promotions for winning these "serious" games, Dutch?
Then why do we not see you ever throwing cold water at your extreme radical rightie cohorts who on a regular base come out spouting off ridiculous extreme right-wing views?I just throw cold water on overzealous and idealistic comments that don't make a whole lot of sense. Most extreme posters don't take the time to do a quick internet search to verify or understand headlines and opinions they are drawn to in media. This doesn't endear me with people on social media. You're most likely not going to get a "good point' from the TERB crowd that disagrees with you.