The Great Andrew Tate Interview #2

[mandrill]

Appently vids like that make him millions

I'm sure they help him project his "brand".

 

[mandrill]

He's new to Islam and wouldn't be considered a religious leader by anyone.

Here he discusses his recent conversion with an Islamic scholar.

The "Islamic Scholar" appears to be a stooge who feeds Tait softball questions to allow Tait to expand and talk about himself. He's basically a hired cocksucker and the entire video is sad.

Here's the same dude tossing softballs to Jordan Peterson. Mohamed Hijab must be interviewing all these right wing "controversialists".

 

[dirtyharry555]

The "Islamic Scholar" appears to be a stooge who feeds Tait softball questions to allow Tait to expand and talk about himself. He's basically a hired cocksucker and the entire video is sad.

Here's the same dude tossing softballs to Jordan Peterson. Mohamed Hijab must be interviewing all these right wing "controversialists".

I've seen this video. He challenges Peterson on a number of topics. I understand that a civilized discussion might come across to you as "softballs" when you're so accustomed to empty one-liner "gotcha" hardball politics.

Besides, we both know you didn't watch either video yet you're here commenting on both. See a trend?

 

[mandrill]

I've seen this video. He challenges Peterson on a number of topics. I understand that a civilized discussion might come across to you as "softballs" when you're so accustomed to empty one-liner "gotcha" hardball politics.

Besides, we both know you didn't watch either video yet you're here commenting on both. See a trend?

Here's something I did do, Harry. I looked up Hijab's twitter page.

He stirs up a lot of conflict against Hindus and the Israeli government and has about 100,000 followers. Not a reclusive Koranic scholar by any means. Bet he's trying to build that follower count.

https://twitter.com/mohammed_hijab

I watched a couple of excerpts and they were exactly as I described. The video is an hour +. No one's going to watch that except hardcores like you.

 

[Azria]

I don’t buy this guy’s persona one bit. It’s a gimmick, and I think at night he curls up in bed watching romantic comedies.

 

[The Oracle]

mandrill is a dinosaur. He doesn't know the many ways in which young people on the internet make money legitimately (without selling explicit content).

Amazon must be a scam because they allow drop shipping. https://sell.amazon.com/learn/what-is-dropshipping

Amazon are grifters don't you know........

 

[The Oracle]

Again, if you're going to source from third-party perspectives rather than doing your own research, why bother discussing the man at all?

Cause these people see everything through a narrow lense.

And wouldn't dare peek over their fence.

I find Tait to be part truth, part satire, part provocateur and all show.

Kind of a souped up version of what Milo Yiannopoulos used to be.

It's very amusing how guys are all up in arms about someone who they secretly aspire to be. I mean can't imagine Tait has to pay for attention from the opposite sex.

 

[The Oracle]

He's new to Islam and wouldn't be considered a religious leader by anyone.

Here he discusses his recent conversion with an Islamic scholar.

Love the introduction at the beginning....LOL.

Going to watch this rather than read some ideologues interpretation then adapt it as my own.

 

[Pleasure Hound]

He thinks women belong to men and shouldn't be allowed to drive. That's what it says. Show me that I'm wrong.

Sure, most women "want a tall guy with a high status job" in the sense that I want a 5'9" lingerie model with a 36DD bust. It's a fantasy that you aim for, but along the way you probably find someone you like who doesn't live up to the fantasy but is fun to be with anyway. Because most women are not lingerie models and most guys aren't 6'4" CEO's and even if they are, they might be assholes.

And even hooking up with a CEO doesn't mean a woman wants to be ordered around or to be the guy's "property".

And this is the problem with Tait and Peterson - who have nothing the fuck in common except for the fact that they both grift off gullibles on the Net. They cater to the "Alpha male" fantasy and encourage it to make more money than you are likely to see in several lifetimes.

Wow! Well said, sir!.....

What do you "MIGHT be assholes"?.....LOL

 

[Pleasure Hound]

Because I feel like it. And I don't feel like doing "in depth" research on someone I think is an asshole.

Are you an undertaker? Because you are burying assholes tonight!

 

[Pleasure Hound]

I find Tait to be part truth, part satire, part provocateur and all show.

So was Milo.....

 

[mandrill]

Cause these people see everything through a narrow lense. And wouldn't dare peek over their fence.

I find Tait to be part truth, part satire, part provocateur and all show. Kind of a souped up version of what Milo Yiannopoulos used to be.

It's very amusing how guys are all up in arms about someone who they secretly aspire to be. I mean can't imagine Tait has to pay for attention from the opposite sex.

Well, Milo didn't end well, did he?.... Which is how "all show" people usually crash out.

I think Tate has to pay to play. Some women will like the muscles and the fame. But he's a dick and he's loaded. So they'll want the pay-off as well. Car, clothes, bags, shoes, jewels.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

PS, I LOVE the way Oracle always seeks out and likes posts that take personal shots at me, but never stands up to me in threads mano a mano.

Pretty much says it all about that guy

Maybe he just isn't into elder abuse

 

[escortsxxx]

Well, Milo didn't end well, did he?.... Which is how "all show" people usually crash out.

I think Tate has to pay to play. Some women will like the muscles and the fame. But he's a dick and he's loaded. So they'll want the pay-off as well. Car, clothes, bags, shoes, jewels.

If he is loadef as he said he could dtop the show and continue building wealth off investments. poeple who spend like he does either live on credit or will soon be broke.

He may rent for the camers.

Its not hard to have an estate in the 3rd world. divide prices by 10

 

[escortsxxx]

Maybe he just isn't into elder abuse

At least you have an arch nemsis. they are hard to get!

 

[krealtarron]

Peterson is trying to convince individuals who identify as incels to make themselves more attractive to women.

He states this '' You're a young man and all the women are rejecting you, who's got the problem? If all the women are rejecting you, its you.''

He tries to convince them to get a better education. Get a better job. Dress better. He's trying to give an encouraging word to these demoralized men.

That's good in my view.

Well, yes that is good. But he argues against equality of outcomes usually, but at the same time argues FOR equality of outcomes by going on Joe Rogan's podcast for example and saying that we need to "enforce" monogamy because apparently a few guys are getting all the girls, leading to a lot of incels. My take is, he dishonestly makes money from incels by saying what they want to hear.

 

[krealtarron]

He's neither a con artist, sexist, or misogynist.

The majority of women worldwide happily subscribe to his cultural values. North American women are a small subset of women, and even many of them prefer traditional gender roles (in fact almost all of them do on a selective basis - i.e. most want a tall man with a high status job). It's not politically correct to be a traditional woman. It's also very difficult to assume traditional gender roles under current financial burdens for an average couple, even if it is their preference.



That's exactly what Tate and Peterson advocate. Being dependable, protective, healthy, strong, learned, supportive, providing. The only people interpreting this as "dominating douchebags" are people like yourself. If "alpha" means becoming the 1% through effort, sacrifice, risk, competition, learning, and achievement then they're both alpha and they're advocating the same for others.

Both men will be pilloried by male losers and radical feminists that can't stand that their worldview is not only being challenged but easily debunked.

Sure but he is a western guy, selling most of his stuff to people in the west, but advocating for a 1950s culture. Regardless of what women today like (and I agree a lot of them do like traditional gender roles, even if they dont care to admit it for reasons you mentioned), I think the people he enables, are the idiotic incels.

Secondly, no Tate and Peterson dont advocate for being dependable, supportive men. They only seem to be doing that. What they do however, is teach incels to be entitled and act out - they may not say that explicitly, but that is the cumulative effect of what these guys push.

 

[The Oracle]

Well, yes that is good. But he argues against equality of outcomes usually, but at the same time argues FOR equality of outcomes by going on Joe Rogan's podcast for example and saying that we need to "enforce" monogamy because apparently a few guys are getting all the girls, leading to a lot of incels. My take is, he dishonestly makes money from incels by saying what they want to hear.

So he believes that monogamy is preferential to polygamy. In a polygamous society a small percentage of men with end up with most of the women. Which can to lead to some significant violence. This has been known in the anthropologists circles for about 100 years or so.

''Enforced monogamy'' means enforced by culture not what it sounds like. Not armed soldiers abducting young women under state enforcement and delivering them to ''useless'' men.

This clip is Jordan at his finest. I like and applaud the way Rogan challenges him and Peterson agrees that his statement is contentious.

 

[krealtarron]

So he believes that monogamy is preferential to polygamy. In a polygamous society a small percentage of men with end up with most of the women. Which can to lead to some significant violence. This has been known in the anthropologists circles for about 100 years or so.

''Enforced monogamy'' means enforced by culture not what it sounds like. Not armed soldiers abducting young women under state enforcement and delivering them to ''useless'' men.

I think cultural enforcement is just as bad.

And no we are not talking about polygamy, because that is already illegal. We are talking about polyamory - which should not be legally or culturally banned/looked down upon. People should be able to make their choices. Also it is a myth anyway that a small % of guys are getting all the girls.

In any case it amounts to enforcing outcomes, which he himself is against, so to advocate for equality of outcomes in this particular case is inconsistent and hypocritical. He most certainly is only doing it because he gets to make money off of the kind of audience that appreciates that.

 

[The Oracle]

I think cultural enforcement is just as bad.

And no we are not talking about polygamy, because that is already illegal. We are talking about polyamory - which should not be legally or culturally banned/looked down upon. People should be able to make their choices. Also it is a myth anyway that a small % of guys are getting all the girls.

In any case it amounts to enforcing outcomes, which he himself is against, so to advocate for equality of outcomes in this particular case is inconsistent and hypocritical. He most certainly is only doing it because he gets to make money off of the kind of audience that appreciates that.

Watch the video which I linked just now for clarification.