I am not talking about remedy. I am talking about the fact that he is spewing bold lies to his people who are dumb or evil enough to be happy about it, which should tell you (but doesn't) that maybe it's good to not be one of his people.
Not sure why this matters to your evaluation of the evidence, but I can imagine a few possible reasons. Could be that Rudy's team were not privy to the affavadits that Powell had gathered and vetted and didn't want to appear to vouch for them. Could be that they just didn't want her arguments to get confused with theirs. Could be that they want her case to go first, as a matter of strategy. You'd have to ask Rudy.
Her reference to Chavez was simply historical leading to her claims as to the current ownership and direction of Dominion/Smartmatic, and this chain of control of the company also neatly explains why the vulnerabilities of their system have never been fixed despite being the reason why states like Texas won't buy their product.
Were you having a menstrual cycle or travelling in time? I take back the kudos.
You are desperately trying to make up some ridiculous excuses when Powell actually accused the CIA of being complicit in these so called "rigged elections". Rudy and her are the biggest liars and we will see where this case goes rather than to disrupt or try to delay the nominations. I do not have to ask Rudy who has got his panties in a twist in recent times, since he was nominated as Trump's legal attorney!!
The CIA and other Intel Agencies have probably vetted The Dominion equipment in light of the foreign interference in the past. Otherwise, why will they categorically put out a statement that these elections were the most Secure, Free, fair and Safe ones ever. Is that the only reason why she came up with that outrageous statement that the CIA were also involved with the rigging of these elections. Something she maybe asked to testify under oath??[/QUOTE]
Maybe you should take a break and go through a Grammar Class if you think that The Thesaurus Synonyms are supposed to not sink with our modern era. Do not need your kudos!!
You can posit all the hypotheticals you like. The indisputable fact, and by fact i mean something that is demonstrably observable or provable, is that every court so far has found there has been no evidence of fraud etc. The equipment you are challenging was tested and found to be reliable. Instead of challenging the conclusion your fearless leader then denigrates his own officials and all of the men and women who serve their country in those agencies and thereby does greater harm to the institutions . Really quit parhelic and more parhelic that people attempt to defend him rather than calling him out for the loser that he is.
So you agree that the man is a piece of shit, but you feel that if it helps to keep the peasants in check, it's all fine and dandy. Are you a little bit disgusted with yourself at least sometimes?
Of course not. It is quite obvious on reading the affidavits that many people are being completely honest and just wildly ignorant. There are some whose entire testimony is "I thought they were mean to me". Others clearly don't understand the process of the audit. Outside of some of the experts who seem like they could be just bad actors, the majority of these people are offering honest, if irrelevant, testimony.
Have you read it? The affidavits are mostly pointless, as I said above. Some of the experts have redacted names and so have to be dismissed. A number are claiming mathematical proofs that don't seem to hold up. Others have weird hedging about their credentials.
Your posts are good blend of the wacky pointlessness of Beaver mixed with the wildly off-base presumptuousness of Frank. You've found a nice niche here.
Actually I think Trump's policies are very middle class friendly, but I also think middle class friendly policy is good for everyone. Is Trump a good man? Of course not, and neither is Biden.
Dude, your posts seem to be from a character from the Trailer Park Boys.
Really? Which one? I hope it's Julian. He's as sexy as Patrick Swayze!
Actually Curly was my favorite Stooges. I'll bet if he were alive today he would read one of your posts and think WOOOOP WOOOOOP, NYA NYA NYA NYA , this guy is craaaaaaazy.
Curly was never that political, Squeezer. He'd be off on the pooning board reviewing a PSE orgy he had with several ladies and Larry and Moe in the hot tub VIP room at Pure Spa.
fb.watch
Bud, when you buy a used car next, take it to a mechanic and have it inspected before you pay for it.
thehill.com
www.freep.com
Those are some pretty stupid errors, but isn't this the thing that's more serious?
That's an impressive list. A lot of those elements are also problems in the GA filing, since some of it is just cut and paste from there.
