You really think they are doing a good job? You ok with paying millions on arrivescan app? Paying influencers?You dont even know what a good job entails. So you calling out someone for a "terrible job" is a joke.
You really think they are doing a good job? You ok with paying millions on arrivescan app? Paying influencers?You dont even know what a good job entails. So you calling out someone for a "terrible job" is a joke.
You were talking about balancing the budget. Not ArriveScan. ArriveScan procurement may have been sus but the app itself was actually very useful as I used it multiple times during the pandemic to travel to India and back in 2021 and 2022.You really think they are doing a good job? You ok with paying millions on arrivescan app? Paying influencers?
That's nothing on DoFo's $8 billion greenbelt scam, $650 million Ontario Place scam, Science Centre scam and everything he's touched.You really think they are doing a good job? You ok with paying millions on arrivescan app? Paying influencers?
That's just it...there was no context in the rest of the quote. "Cherry picking": would be if there was indeed context and if that was ignored. That's what "cherry picking is. In this case, there was no further context or meaning.The cherry picked words were meaningless without the rest of the quote. And when in seen in context of the quote, it is clear that it is being used as a soundbite by desperate righties.
You can focus your hate on DoFo....call him out...the fact is....JT for 9 years hasn't had a clue how to balance the budget...he taxed Canadians left and right with nothing to show for it....what are paying influencers for?That's nothing on DoFo's $8 billion greenbelt scam, $650 million Ontario Place scam, Science Centre scam and everything he's touched.
The only cons who have ever balanced a budget were in Alberta, where they wasted oil revenues for low taxes instead of setting up a Norway like $1 trillion fund for the people. Look at DoFo to see what you'd get in PeePee, biggest deficits and debts ever combined with massive service cuts and closing ER's, family doctors and nurses leaving.
You think all these nonsense expenditures doesn't affect the budget? Did I question the usefulness of the arrivescan app? may have been sus? like 249M overpayment?You were talking about balancing the budget. Not ArriveScan. ArriveScan procurement may have been sus but the app itself was actually very useful as I used it multiple times during the pandemic to travel to India and back in 2021 and 2022.
But back on topic, tell me, how you would balance the budget? What does that look like to you? You dont even know what "balance the budget" actually means and yet here you are talking about it. As Is said, its typical of righties.
What does Jodie Foster have to say about that?Nobody wants to turn Canada into a communist state, that's skoopid.
You fall for the same line from the people who own you every single time.
Capital gains, not paid income, skoob.Ah yes right on queue...we are now entering the part of the program where you just make shit up hoping no one will call you out for bullshit.
View attachment 336154
View attachment 336155
You're the one that tries to push misinformation about DoFo's policy here, skoob.What does Jodie Foster have to say about that?
Do you have any more fake quotes from her you can share like the last one Mr. Misinformation King??
So you bounce between income and capital gains as a distraction tactic?Capital gains, not paid income, skoob.
Try to keep track of the subject or if you can't understand then just shut up.
We are talking about people making bank off stocks and real estate, where they aren't taxed on all capital gains like workers are taxed on all of their income. And as a reminder, under Mulroney, capital gains was at 75%.
Really?You're the one that tries to push misinformation about DoFo's policy here, skoob.
Yeah ArriveScan with its 250M expense, is the only thing that affects the budget even more than the pandemic did.You think all these nonsense expenditures doesn't affect the budget? Did I question the usefulness of the arrivescan app? may have been sus? like 249M overpayment?![]()
![]()
You fear Peepee but this is ok with you?
Of course there was context. He was criticizing conservative methods of balancing the budget. You cherry picked 5 words from his entire quote.That's just it...there was no context in the rest of the quote. "Cherry picking": would be if there was indeed context and if that was ignored. That's what "cherry picking is. In this case, there was no further context or meaning.
Why are you defending it when it's clear it was just gibberish?
No he criticized the conservatives and he said the budget would balance itself without explaining how. Why do you keep missing that point? Are you doing this on purpose to avoid admitting that he has no clue about finances?Of course there was context. He was criticizing conservative methods of balancing the budget. You cherry picked 5 words from his entire quote.
He did explain how. He said by growing the economy and taking care of Canadians. It is in the very quote I provided. Why do you keep missing that part or are you just selectively blind? Again, you cherry picked 5 words that were used in the right context to convey the right meaning. This was a nothing-burger that righties like to jump up and down about.No he criticized the conservatives and he said the budget would balance itself without explaining how. Why do you keep missing that point? Are you doing this on purpose to avoid admitting that he has no clue about finances?
It's like saying: my roommate has not cleaned the house and it's a mess and everyone should keep their house tidy by taking the time to clean it and therefore the house will be tidy on it's own.
"growing the economy and taking care of people" is a motherhood statement without substance. It's what every government needs to do. It does not explain at all how the budget will balance itself.He did explain how. He said by growing the economy and taking care of Canadians. It is in the very quote I provided. Why do you keep missing that part or are you just selectively blind? Again, you cherry picked 5 words that were used in the right context to convey the right meaning. This was a nothing-burger that righties like to jump up and down about.
Arrivecan 250M you frown upon? like it's no big deal is laughable...Yeah ArriveScan with its 250M expense, is the only thing that affects the budget even more than the pandemic did.Again you talked about balancing the budget. I asked you, what a balanced budget would look like to you. What would you spend on, what would you cut? Go ahead. Explain to us please.
Of course there was context. He was criticizing conservative methods of balancing the budget. You cherry picked 5 words from his entire quote.
Anybody can say "we'll grow the economy" anybody can say "we'll take care of Canadians".... but if they have nothing to show for it after 9 years....well what the fuck did they do for 9 years? and the budget still not balancing itself...He did explain how. He said by growing the economy and taking care of Canadians. It is in the very quote I provided. Why do you keep missing that part or are you just selectively blind? Again, you cherry picked 5 words that were used in the right context to convey the right meaning. This was a nothing-burger that righties like to jump up and down about.
There you go. A growing GDP. He did not lie. He did grow the economy as evidenced by growth in GDP. And if you cannot read a chart, check from 2015 onwards.Anybody can say "we'll grow the economy" anybody can say "we'll take care of Canadians".... but if they have nothing to show for it after 9 years....well what the fuck did they do for 9 years? and the budget still not balancing itself...... but hey... i get to use woman-kind now.... and also you can identify as female if you feel like...
![]()
So a non-response. I asked you how a "BaLaNcEd BuDgEt" you have been running your mouth about, would look like. You have no answers. You were yammering on about things you have no clue about. PP fed you some bullshit and you are regurgitating it here.Arrivecan 250M you frown upon? like it's no big deal is laughable...![]()
![]()
... Trudeau has been giving away tax money like it's his...
... maybe cut the salaries of the people running this country in half because they're doing a half-ass job
... that would be a good start...
is "cherry picking" your phrase of the day? looks like you heard it somewhere, googled the meaning and now use it conveniently...
I'm sure Peepee is still the boogeyman in your eyes...GTFO
Yes and he is not required to explain how the budget needs to be balanced, because the purpose of his statement was to call out the conservative bullshit about artificially balancing the budget by cutting services to people who most need them. So saying "we need to grow the economy and take care of people first" is more than sufficient and in that context his usage of those words were appropriate. Righties cherry picked 5 words to have their PP circle jerk."growing the economy and taking care of people" is a motherhood statement without substance. It's what every government needs to do. It does not explain at all how the budget will balance itself.
Motherhood statement definition: A vague, "feel good" platitude, especially one made by a politician, that few people would disagree with. For example: "Our country must contribute to world peace."
Not required to explain? Or do you mean "can't explain"? You criticize Poilievre for not showing detailed proposed policies but accept some vague motherhood statement from Trudeau?Yes and he is not required to explain how the budget needs to be balanced, because the purpose of his statement was to call out the conservative bullshit about artificially balancing the budget by cutting services to people who most need them. So saying "we need to grow the economy and take care of people first" is more than sufficient and in that context his usage of those words were appropriate. Righties cherry picked 5 words to have their PP circle jerk.