Sick Days

I still like my sick days 24 a year. A union is only needed where the employeer shafts the employee(s). Now just think what would happen to these employees at the city without CUPE!!!! da you want to work for $9.00
 
Just coincidence, but my district manager got it in the neck today.

21 years. He was still a young man, too. Nice guy, knew his job.

Re-organization after our company was acquired as part of a merger.

I'm sure he got an excellent package, but still....:rolleyes:

I hope he took every sick day and vacation owed to him.
 
buckwheat1 said:
I still like my sick days 24 a year. A union is only needed where the employeer shafts the employee(s). Now just think what would happen to these employees at the city without CUPE!!!! da you want to work for $9.00

Like I've said we need unions for reasons already stated. It's been 30 years since I worked for $9.00/hr. Never saw a union anywhere.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
You gotta love Larue, why should workers have a say in wages. Oh cause they have had a say since about the 1860s in Canada. Ever buy a house or a car? One side is buying one side is selling. If they reach a common price they have a deal, if they don't one side has to move or the deal falls apart.

It is exactly the same thing with a labour agreement. The workers organize a union and tell the employer the price of labour is X. Boss says no it is Y. They negotiate until they have a deal or it falls apart eg strike or lockout. The workers have an equal say in wages just as one person applying to a one employee company has a say.

In your world if the deal is not negotiated, you make the house unlivable for anyone else and prevent the buyer from looking at another house by striking
How is that a good comparison??
Not even close
If I think your asking too much for your house, I am free to look at another house. But not in your world. Strange world

A much simpler solution is the employer offers a fair wage & benefits package & the employee can accept it or look elsewhere.

That way there is no extortion (strike) & the customer continues to receive the good or services uninterrupted & everyone wins.

This is what you nimrod lefts do not recognize. The most important person in any business is the not the worker Its the customer
This simple concept separates most successful organizations from the also rans.
You seem to think the business organization exists to provide you with a living. Thats not the case

If the supply of qualified employees is low the employer is forced to raise his offer.
If the supply is low he is not forced to raise his offer.

Just like buying a house or car, but nobody buys a house or car under the threat of a strike
 
You must be frustrated Larue?

JohnLarue said:
In your world if the deal is not negotiated, you make the house unlivable for anyone else and prevent the buyer from looking at another house by striking
How is that a good comparison??
Not even close
If I think your asking too much for your house, I am free to look at another house. But not in your world. Strange world

A much simpler solution is the employer offers a fair wage & benefits package & the employee can accept it or look elsewhere.

That way there is no extortion (strike) & the customer continues to receive the good or services uninterrupted & everyone wins.

This is what you nimrod lefts do not recognize. The most important person in any business is the not the worker Its the customer
This simple concept separates most successful organizations from the also rans.
You seem to think the business organization exists to provide you with a living. Thats not the case

If the supply of qualified employees is low the employer is forced to raise his offer.
If the supply is low he is not forced to raise his offer.

Just like buying a house or car, but nobody buys a house or car under the threat of a strike

It must be frustrating for you Larue, holding these extreme opinions and knowing there isn't a snowball's chance anybody is listening?
 
Mrbig1949 said:
It must be frustrating for you Larue, holding these extreme opinions and knowing there isn't a snowball's chance anybody is listening?

I'm listening. Anyone else?

By the way, a new offer from the city is on the table, sorry the status quo is not it. I think it's sick day buy out offer. No other info.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
Lots of city planners and nurses aids in CUPE You said public workers are lazy so I listed many of the lazy fucks you seem to be talking about.

I noticed you didn't deny that most CUPE workers are lazy fucks and that they join CUPE shops because they don't really want to work.

BTW, if city planners and nurses aids are CUPE workers that probably means they are lazy fucks, like all the other CUPE workers.

I stand my my comment: I would NEVER work for a CUPE shop because it would be an immediate career killer. If I ever tried to go get a real job I would have a hard time convincing anyone that i'm not a lazy fuck. Total career killer.

Maybe you could save the day by spending some time in the interview griping about how you were forced to join a ridiculous union and how unpleasant it made life working there since everyone else was so lazy. That might do it, but it's really not worth the risk.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
It must be frustrating for you Larue, holding these extreme opinions and knowing there isn't a snowball's chance anybody is listening?

Other way around pal.
Take a look at the poll
 
Strike over issue forgotten

JohnLarue said:
Other way around pal.
Take a look at the poll


I have lived through soooo many public service strikes, TTC usually the favourite, OMFG everything is going to change, unions are finished, strike over yaaan, back to sleep. zzzzz
 
Mrbig1949 said:
It is exactly the same thing with a labour agreement. The workers organize a union and tell the employer the price of labour is X. Boss says no it is Y. They negotiate until they have a deal or it falls apart eg strike or lockout. The workers have an equal say in wages just as one person applying to a one employee company has a say.

Funny, when companies get together to fix prices, it is known as price fixing and is illegal. For some strange reason, capitalist cartels are frowned upon.

But when the left unionizes and fixes prices, that is somehow ok.

Workers have a say in wages without unions. They can either work for the offered price, negotiate a better deal for themselves, or go find another job.
 
Zzzzzzzzzz

Compromised said:
Funny, when companies get together to fix prices, it is known as price fixing and is illegal. For some strange reason, capitalist cartels are frowned upon.

But when the left unionizes and fixes prices, that is somehow ok.

Workers have a say in wages without unions. They can either work for the offered price, negotiate a better deal for themselves, or go find another job.


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz tired old rhetoric, ad hominem attacks, sounds like turn of the century stuff. The 20th C.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz tired old rhetoric, ad hominem attacks, sounds like turn of the century stuff. The 20th C.

Thats how dated your view of the economy is

Honestly, globalization has exponentially increased the competition all Canadian organizations are facing. (Including the city of Toronto, it is in competition for conventions & tourism dollars- this garbage strike has done a lot of damage)

Paying 20,000 employees to not work 21 days out of 250 will just not cut it going forward.
 
With who? You?

JohnLarue said:
Thats how dated your view of the economy is

Honestly, globalization has exponentially increased the competition all Canadian organizations are facing. (Including the city of Toronto, it is in competition for conventions & tourism dollars- this garbage strike has done a lot of damage)

Paying 20,000 employees to not work 21 days out of 250 will just not cut it going forward.

If it has done a lot of damage the fault is totally on the city. 3% + status quo is just soooo easy. Check the offer coming this weekend. Sam Sullivan lost his own parties nomination for Mayor of Vancouver because he left garbage workers (CUPE) out too long. Behind the screen Metro Labour Council will be telling Miller you better end this in our favour soon or go fuck yourself at the Labour Day parade on Labour Day. If this happens he can dust off the old resume.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
If it has done a lot of damage the fault is totally on the city. 3% + status quo is just soooo easy. Check the offer coming this weekend. Sam Sullivan lost his own parties nomination for Mayor of Vancouver because he left garbage workers (CUPE) out too long. Behind the screen Metro Labour Council will be telling Miller you better end this in our favour soon or go fuck yourself at the Labour Day parade on Labour Day. If this happens he can dust off the old resume.


3% + is so easy but so wrong.

Your own words. The unions will be threatening His Whiteness to do what they want or else; and your behind the curtains and privy to these comments .... just how?


The union's response to the cities last offer, 'THTHTHTHTHTH!!!' I hope I got the right spelling.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
If it has done a lot of damage the fault is totally on the city. 3% + status quo is just soooo easy. Check the offer coming this weekend. Sam Sullivan lost his own parties nomination for Mayor of Vancouver because he left garbage workers (CUPE) out too long. Behind the screen Metro Labour Council will be telling Miller you better end this in our favour soon or go fuck yourself at the Labour Day parade on Labour Day. If this happens he can dust off the old resume.


So the value that the union provides is the absence of blackmail and extortion if and only if you agree to their terms?

Nice

All the more reason to stand up to this group & make them provide real value in exchange for their wages & benefits, like the rest of the civilized non-unionized workforce
 
What you are not going to get!

JohnLarue said:
So the value that the union provides is the absence of blackmail and extortion if and only if you agree to their terms?

Nice

All the more reason to stand up to this group & make them provide real value in exchange for their wages & benefits, like the rest of the civilized non-unionized workforce

In Larue's mind and a few others, the owner/managers arrives at a compensation package and puts it out there on a take it or work somewhere else basis. What kind of dreamland is that? Wake up. Read some history.
 
Mrbig1949 said:
In Larue's mind and a few others, the owner/managers arrives at a compensation package and puts it out there on a take it or work somewhere else basis. What kind of dreamland is that? Wake up. Read some history.


It works for 70 to 80% of the workforce.
If the employee feels he is under compensated he finds another job.
This is a bad thing for the employer if the employee is a valued asset, which most are. So most tend to raise compensation to keep good employees

What makes your group of workers so special that the laws of supply & demand do not apply to them?

Oh yes I forgot. They are willing to apply extortion
 
Mrbig1949 said:
In Larue's mind and a few others, the owner/managers arrives at a compensation package and puts it out there on a take it or work somewhere else basis. What kind of dreamland is that? Wake up. Read some history.


I've negotiated enough contracts for projects involving staff of various sizes and don't remember the last time someone open the discussion with, 'this is my offer, take or leave it.' So your over simplified statement is more a reflection of the adversarial environment that you and your representatives operate in; at who instigation I'm not in a position to say, but you seem to say it happens all the time. Maybe it's time to look at your attitudes, product or presentation at these negotiation meetings. It's certainly something that I don't deal with as often as you do. There's almost always give and take to come up with the right solution.
If you go into negotiations with an attitude of this it it, nothing else will do, no wonder you get scorn and resistance as often as you claim.