Should I be terrified of climate change?

[Frankfooter]

the chart was not in the paper
the paper does not answer the questions about the chart

The paper answers the questions you asked about the 'bump' in temp in the 30's along with 1878.
You'd know that if you read it but you can't understand scientific papers and are afraid of reading real science.

sorry natural variability has been ignored by climate science, now you want it to explain a 2 in one hundred year event

What an ignorant statement.
You really do not know the research at all.

they are not correlated
View attachment 317678

Please post the source for this chart.
that data looks wrong.

again try night school to finish the requirement for your high school diploma
learning science via children's cartoons has not worked well for you

Have you passed the kids page on the greenhouse effect at NASA yet, larue?
Is it too hard for you?

Or is it just because it makes you look incredibly stupid and your theories moronic?
Every claim you make is wrong according to every kid that reads the science here.

What Is the Greenhouse Effect?

Learn more about this process that occurs when gases in Earth's atmosphere trap the Sun's heat.

climatekids.nasa.gov

 

[bver_hunter]

Why are you making stuff up that you think I said?...are you reading my posts?

Newsflash: I never claimed that forest fires are deliberately started by those who believe in climate change.

I claimed that most are caused by people whether deliberate or by accident. Period.

Listen, your inference when you got into this discussion with the Australian model was highlighted here:

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/should-i-be-terrified-of-climate-change.847958/post-8458148

Yes, that those fires were deliberately started in Australia, when I was bringing up the nonsense spewed from Trump's nostrils as to the forest fires on those Federal lands in California!!

Below in your other response shifts the emphasis on Deliberate Forest fires. Moreover, you falsely claim that the Arsonists are the ones trying to "Fool people into thinking that it was due to Climate Change".
Where do you get that crap from?

You think Australia is the only place on earth where forest fires are started by people and nowhere else?

Arsonists don't just pick hot summers to start fires so they can fool people into thinking it's due to climate change.

 

[Skoob]

You're still off topic, skoobypoo.


This is a thread about climate change.
You can't debate the facts or evidence.

Rising CO2 levels have caused rising global temperatures, exactly as the IPCC projected they would.
The science is correct, we have 20+ years of seeing the models be very accurate and there is no other explanation.

The best you can do is to 'distract' by making stupid claims about other issues, like forest fires.
But you can't dispute the truth and the evidence.

I just proved you went off topic and you simply ignore that proof. haha you are so predictable it's funny.

You even lie to yourself. Lol!

 

[Skoob]

Listen, your inference when you got into this discussion with the Australian model was highlighted here:

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/should-i-be-terrified-of-climate-change.847958/post-8458148

Yes, that those fires were deliberately started in Australia, when I was bringing up the nonsense spewed from Trump's nostrils as to the forest fires on those Federal lands in California!!

Below in your other response shifts the emphasis on Deliberate Forest fires. Moreover, you falsely claim that the Arsonists are the ones trying to "Fool people into thinking that it was due to Climate Change".
Where do you get that crap from?

If you actually read what I said rather than creating your own interpretation of it, I actually said arsonists are not starting forest fires to fool people about climate change.

I'll say it again and I'll type it slowly for you: MOST FOREST FIRES ARE STARTED BY PEOPLE EITHER DELIBERATELY OR BY ACCIDENT. So you can stop misleading people that forest fires are caused by climate change.

 

[Frankfooter]

I just proved you went off topic and you simply ignore that proof. haha you are so predictable it's funny.

You even lie to yourself. Lol!

You're still off topic, skoobypoo.


This is a thread about climate change.
You can't debate the facts or evidence.

Rising CO2 levels have caused rising global temperatures, exactly as the IPCC projected they would.
The science is correct, we have 20+ years of seeing the models be very accurate and there is no other explanation.

The best you can do is to 'distract' by making stupid claims about other issues, like forest fires.
But you can't dispute the truth and the evidence.

 

[Frankfooter]

If you actually read what I said rather than creating your own interpretation of it, I actually said arsonists are not starting forest fires to fool people about climate change.

I'll say it again and I'll type it slowly for you: MOST FOREST FIRES ARE STARTED BY PEOPLE EITHER DELIBERATELY OR BY ACCIDENT. So you can stop misleading people that forest fires are caused by climate change.

So now you're claiming your entire argument was bullshit to begin with, that most fires are caused by accidents and its just the drier, climate change conditions, that caused the rise in forest fires?

 

[Skoob]

So now you're claiming your entire argument was bullshit to begin with, that most fires are caused by accidents and its just the drier, climate change conditions, that caused the rise in forest fires?

haha typical FF twisting words...

Arsonists and accidents. I have not strayed from that argument...you are just grasping at straws because you have fallen for a propaganda campaign that is failing you. Why do you discredit yourself by thinking twisting others' words somehow make you right? You fall on your face every time. You would think you would have learned your lesson by now but apparently not.

 

[Skoob]

You're still off topic, skoobypoo.


This is a thread about climate change.
You can't debate the facts or evidence.

Rising CO2 levels have caused rising global temperatures, exactly as the IPCC projected they would.
The science is correct, we have 20+ years of seeing the models be very accurate and there is no other explanation.

The best you can do is to 'distract' by making stupid claims about other issues, like forest fires.
But you can't dispute the truth and the evidence.

Just because you repeat a lie doesn't make it true. Unless of course you are delusional and require medical assistance for your mental illness.

Read Post #17...you went off topic...you just don't remember you did. (that's where the mental illness part comes in)

 

[Frankfooter]

haha typical FF twisting words...

Arsonists and accidents. I have not strayed from that argument...you are just grasping at straws because you have fallen for a propaganda campaign that is failing you. Why do you discredit yourself by thinking twisting others' words somehow make you right? You fall on your face every time. You would think you would have learned your lesson by now but apparently not.

Yes you have, skoobypoo.

You claimed that the increase in forest fires was from arson, now you're saying its from accidents and maybe arson, but you're not sure.
Which means that all you've done is proven that climate change has caused the conditions for forest fires to worsen and as a result, there are more forest fires.

You proved my point, not yours.

This was you.

 

[Frankfooter]

Just because you repeat a lie doesn't make it true. Unless of course you are delusional and require medical assistance for your mental illness.

Read Post #17...you went off topic...you just don't remember you did. (that's where the mental illness part comes in)

How many times will you continue to troll the thread and not stay on topic?
Answer the questions, skoobypoo.
Can you disprove the rise in global temperature and CO2 are not just as the IPCC projected?


This is a thread about climate change.
You can't debate the facts or evidence.

Rising CO2 levels have caused rising global temperatures, exactly as the IPCC projected they would.
The science is correct, we have 20+ years of seeing the models be very accurate and there is no other explanation.

The best you can do is to 'distract' by making stupid claims about other issues, like forest fires.
But you can't dispute the truth and the evidence.

 

[Skoob]

Yes you have, skoobypoo.

You claimed that the increase in forest fires was from arson, now you're saying its from accidents and maybe arson, but you're not sure.
Which means that all you've done is proven that climate change has caused the conditions for forest fires to worsen and as a result, there are more forest fires.

You proved my point, not yours.

This was you.

I said it was both and never said otherwise.
No amount of twisting yourself into a pretzel changes reality.
Fact is, people are the cause not climate change.
Sorry to shatter your illusion.

 

[Skoob]

How many times will you continue to troll the thread and not stay on topic?
Answer the questions, skoobypoo.
Can you disprove the rise in global temperature and CO2 are not just as the IPCC projected?


This is a thread about climate change.
You can't debate the facts or evidence.

Rising CO2 levels have caused rising global temperatures, exactly as the IPCC projected they would.
The science is correct, we have 20+ years of seeing the models be very accurate and there is no other explanation.

The best you can do is to 'distract' by making stupid claims about other issues, like forest fires.
But you can't dispute the truth and the evidence.

For someone who cries about someone having to stay on topic you sure go off topic every time like you did in post #17 here. Why do you do that? Just curious?
Is it that mental illness your battling?

 

[bver_hunter]

If you actually read what I said rather than creating your own interpretation of it, I actually said arsonists are not starting forest fires to fool people about climate change.

I'll say it again and I'll type it slowly for you: MOST FOREST FIRES ARE STARTED BY PEOPLE EITHER DELIBERATELY OR BY ACCIDENT. So you can stop misleading people that forest fires are caused by climate change.

Where is the "ARE NOT" in your actual sentence below:

Arsonists don't just pick hot summers to start fires so they can fool people into thinking it's due to climate change.

You either speak in riddles or are living in denial as to what you meant!!

In Canada 80% of the forest fires destruction is started by Climate Change as I have already proven that to you. This Climate Change is in the form of lightening that triggers the fires!!

 

[JohnLarue]

Where is the "ARE NOT" in your actual sentence below:



You either speak in riddles or are living in denial as to what you meant!!

In Canada 80% of the forest fires destruction is started by Climate Change as I have already proven that to you. This Climate Change is in the form of lightening that triggers the fires!!

that is not backed up by the data (provided you dont cheery pick the data)

 

[Frankfooter]

I said it was both and never said otherwise.
No amount of twisting yourself into a pretzel changes reality.
Fact is, people are the cause not climate change.
Sorry to shatter your illusion.

People caused climate change, climate change caused forests around the world to dry out and suffer insect damage.
That is the cause of the increase in forest fires.

You lost this debate too, skoobypoo, like every other debate.

Climate change will make wildfires worse, even in areas that don’t have wildfires today - Wildfire Today

Yet another destination known for its skiing and snowy winters will be forced to contend with growing wildfire severity and frequency. The Alps, Europe’s largest mountain range and a world-renowned skiing destination, and the Alpine Foreland, a deep trough in southern Germany at the edge of the...

wildfiretoday.com

 

[Frankfooter]

that is not backed up by the data (provided you dont cheery pick the data)
View attachment 318094

You are posting faked charts.
Those charts do not appear on the NIFC site and are not supported by the NIFC.

What is wrong with you?

 

[Skoob]

Where is the "ARE NOT" in your actual sentence below:



You either speak in riddles or are living in denial as to what you meant!!

In Canada 80% of the forest fires destruction is started by Climate Change as I have already proven that to you. This Climate Change is in the form of lightening that triggers the fires!!

OMG if you would just take a breath before responding to posts and actually read the context and meaning of what people post you would be less confused.

My reference to arsonists was in response to your comment about fires during hot times of the year.

Jeezuz next time I'll include pictures if that helps you.

 

[Skoob]

People caused climate change, climate change caused forests around the world to dry out and suffer insect damage.
That is the cause of the increase in forest fires.

You lost this debate too, skoobypoo, like every other debate.

Climate change will make wildfires worse, even in areas that don’t have wildfires today - Wildfire Today

Yet another destination known for its skiing and snowy winters will be forced to contend with growing wildfire severity and frequency. The Alps, Europe’s largest mountain range and a world-renowned skiing destination, and the Alpine Foreland, a deep trough in southern Germany at the edge of the...

wildfiretoday.com

So now insects are causing forest fires? hahahaha

I know you're joking because the facts would strongly disagree with you.

 

[Frankfooter]

So now insects are causing forest fires? hahahaha

I know you're joking because the facts would strongly disagree with you.

You totally failed to read that post correctly.
Typical.

 

[Skoob]

You totally failed to read that post correctly.
Typical.

I always knew you had a bug up your ass, but I'm surprised that bug is also an arsonist! Lol!
btw shouldn't you be having that bug for lunch soon?