You know what's really pathetic, beside your support of the genocide of Palestinians, of course?Your invented reality. The political people say they accept Israel's offer while actually sending a different proposal just like they did last time. More importantly, it's not up to the millionaires in Qatar but Sinwar and Dief in Gaza since they are the guys with the guns.
Hamas had submitted its response to Qatari mediators, proposing amendments to the Israeli proposal, including a timeline for a permanent ceasefire and complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, a source with knowledge of the talks told CNN earlier on Tuesday.
More importantly, Sinwar has been exposed for what we've known all along. he doesn't want peace, he wants civilian deaths.
That the US gave Israel everything it asked for in to create a UNSC ceasefire resolution and still Israel won't agree to it.
The US ceasefire plan allows Israel to continue the 'siege' or the genocide through starvation, along with allowing Israel to resume the genocide of Gaza once Hamas returns hostages.
A reminder, Israel negotiated with Hamas and 105 hostages were returned peacefully. Israel has returned 4 but killed about 50 hostages through violence.
Blinken, the ‘ultimate spinner’
This is what’s so infuriating about Secretary Blinken: He is so well-mannered, soft-spoken, very diplomatic. But when it comes to the content of what he says, he is the ultimate spinner – half facts, half truths.
He said the two proposals are virtually the same. But I will name you two important differences: One is that the Hamas proposal calls for the end of Israel’s siege; the proposal outlined by the US does not. What’s the point of this war or the past 20 years of four wars against Gaza if we’re going to go back to square one where Israel imposes a siege on Gaza? So the Hamas proposal suggested ending the Israeli siege on Gaza. This new proposal does not.
Two, there’s the key difference between a permanent and temporary ceasefire. This proposal speaks of a temporary ceasefire. Hamas presented a permanent ceasefire. The difference lies in phase two, which says that Israel will withdraw from the Gaza Strip upon the agreement of the parties – which means Israel will have to agree. And there’s every proof and demonstration that Israel does not want to end the war, and it keeps saying that this resolution will allow it to achieve its war objectives.
Blinken assures us that Israel said “Yes” to the proposal. I am not convinced. Why hasn’t Netanyahu come out and said, “I support and embrace the new Security Council resolution”? That’s the question that needs to be posed to Secretary Blinken.