O
Shepard Smith makes shocking announcement that he is leaving Fox News
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
What a fucking ignorant comment you clearly don't watch Fox News. You're really trying to argue that folks like Brett Baier, Neil Cavuto, Martha McCallum, Shannon Bream, Bill Hemmer, Sandra Smith, Harris Faulkner, Maria Bartaromo, Arthel Neville, Eric Shawn etc. don't have journalistic integrity?
At least Fox admits it has a news division and an opinion division. CNN, MSNBC don't do the same - they market themselves as solely hard news organizations. What a crock.
CNN is the most watched American News Network outside of the USA. Their documentaries etc. have the highest ratings and viewers round the globe. We know that in the USA opinions are indeed very polarized. However, if you watch their global news network it is the most informative without any bias. Of course the regular anchors of all the networks have that bias, be it towards the Republicans or The Democrats. CNN have both the news and opinion divisions along with their international divisions. Their coverage of wars and conflicts etc, is extensive with the most journalists on the ground. Just because Trump rambles on and on about "fake" news on a constant basis, does not make it the Gospel truth. He hates the facts!!
IV, none of the other clowns on this site have even seen Fox News or MSNBC. They are just blathering out the bullshit that they hear on CNN.
CNN International is good news, the channel we get, the U.S channel is horseshit, they don't have any credibility, no MSM news channel does
I have watched it and have seen it for myself, they have an agenda. "News" shouldn't be that way. They should give an impartial point of view which they don't, regardless of what side you're on you can hear the side you like with little regard for the truth. Each network promotes for the parties they like and try to influence elections by making candidates from the other side look bad.
How about Canadian MSM like CBC, CTV, City News etc. I have not found any deliberate bias of any sort as is obvious in the newspapers like The Toronto Sun or The Toronto Star. There was one TV News media called The Sun that tried to be The Canadian Fox News Network, but due to it's pathetic content and extremist views with anchors like Ezra Levant, it failed miserably as only a very small segment of the Canadians actual viewed it on a daily basis. This is not what the majority of Canadians desire, as they are happy with the above named sources!!
I agree with you about Canadian TV news but I thought we were discussing the U. S news. I don't think we can even call it that anymore.
Well there are various US local news channels from Buffalo, and we get them on our TV stations. I do not find any bias as they are involved in the actual news events. Even their international news barely has any bias. They have to report about Trump, as what is occurring with him does make the headlines.
I wonder if this is just because of wide global distribution and not actual popularity by choice. CNN was the first U.S. 24 hour cable news network. For many years, it was the only way to stay apprised of news back home when traveling abroad.
I have friends who freak out that you cite Fox News as a source. I actually avoid posting Fox News as a source here even if it is objective information. I'll just find and post a source with similar information. When you watch CNN and read certain papers, some are going to get upset when the CNN bias isn't confirmed.
The difference with Fox News is their news anchors rarely crossover into opinion. CNN and MSNBC have late morning/afternoon anchors providing anti-Trump commentary. It was humorous when Nicole Wallace kept talking over a Trump speech that he was lying about the Bidens. Fox News evening opinion commentators will challenge Democrats' rhetoric but never a news anchor and never talking over a speech.
This is the over the top NIcole Wallace clip. At least wait for him to finish before providing your opinion. Lol.
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-whit...but-trump-isn-t-telling-the-truth-69905989594
Considering their continuing support of foreign wars and multi national conglomerates, private health care and perpetuating the Washington culture that bred it, I'd say they are beyond that statement.
If you report anything positive about Trump or even are not critical enough, you're not fit for the vast majority of the media. These are simply the times we live in. I must say that this is simpler this way. No more pretentions of impartiality. Everyone knows where they stand.
But when Fox runs an objective poll showing poor numbers for trump (51% for impeachment and removal), he and his acolytes go nuts. The poll is not even an opinion, it is fact. So your comment above is totally one-sided. Inability to recognize and ability to deal with reality is a symptom of trump devotee syndrome AKA, TDS.
Polls are never a fact, including the Fox poll that all the lefties loved so much, but didn't bother to read the fine print. Hilarious how Fox became credible in a second!
Wrong again. The results are the results are the results. That is a fact. They may not be totally accurate but the results they present are the factual result of the poll.
And trump and his supporter go nuckin' futs if they don't like the results.
Fox is credible when they conduct an objective poll, it is a factual result. Their opinion mouthpieces are biased, TDS blowhards who clearly have no and deserve no credibility. I am sure the clear difference between those scenarios will go over your trump devotee head.
I don't even think educated liberals understand what you are trying to say. Polls are subjectively built meat grinders. The poll creators can bring their bias incidentally or deliberately into every factor behind a poll.
The only facts are there is a poll and there is somebody paying for the poll.
That's why it's really cool to have elections and use them to change leadership.
