There's also the severely dehumanizing aspect of a lot of reviews that go into far too much detail.
It would be better if reviews kind of eluded to what happened, instead of reading like a play-by-play of the entire session. Like let them know subtly why they should go see the girl. Go ahead and say she sucked a great dick but I mean it doesn't need to get sooooooo explicit
I totally get that perspective. But personally, I really enjoy reading some juicy details or even play-by-play reviews. If someone just writes "she sucked a great dick", or the dreaded "I don't like to go into details...but she was awesome" that leaves me wanting to know more. We all like different things, there are a lot of options out there, so I want to know what made it great.
Also, the very detailed ones can give you a bit of a window into the reviewer's perspective and sometimes help gauge if you should take some of their opinions with a grain of salt. When reading those play-by-play reviews, I keep in mind that YMMV, but reading those details can get me really excited and help me decide who to see. I don't hobby often so picking a new SP is probably bigger decision for me than it should be
. So I like to go into some detail when writing my reviews too, for guys like me.
But too much detail is a concern. Partly because it seems a little crass to share EVERYTHING, and if an SP has made an effort to give a good time, I don't want to make her uncomfortable or cause her problems with what I post publicly. So what I do is ask at the end of the session if she wants a detailed review right now. If she says yes, I'll let her know she can check it out before I post it, if she wants. (That's just to give her a chance to say if there's anything uncomfortably detailed or a service she provided that she doesn't want every guy requesting.)
Another thing I think is good advice for people about to post a detailed review: start it off with a brief one or two sentence review at the top, for those who aren't in the mood to read through all the nitty gritty details.
Here's
one I wrote that I think is an OK balance between not needing to go into a play-by-play of the entire session, but still includes some juicy details of the highlights for those who want to know.